Literature DB >> 21240053

Analysis of preexistent vertebral rotation in the normal infantile, juvenile, and adolescent spine.

Michiel M A Janssen1, Jan-Willem M Kouwenhoven, Tom P C Schlösser, Max A Viergever, Lambertus W Bartels, René M Castelein, Koen L Vincken.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Vertebral rotation was systematically analyzed in the normal, nonscoliotic thoracic spine of children aged 0 to 16 years. Subgroups were created to match the infantile, juvenile, and adolescent age groups according to the criteria of the Scoliosis Research Society.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a distinct pattern of vertebral rotation in the transverse plane exists in the normal, nonscoliotic infantile, juvenile, and adolescent spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: We assume that, once the spine starts to deteriorate into a scoliotic deformity, it will follow a preexisting rotational pattern. Recently, we identified a rotational pattern in the normal nonscoliotic adult spine that corresponds to the most common curve types in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. In infantile idiopathic scoliosis, curves are typically left sided and boys are affected more often than girls, whereas in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, the thoracic curve is typically right sided and predominantly girls are affected. The present study is the first systematic analysis of vertebral rotation in the normal children's spine.
METHODS: Vertebral rotation in the transverse plane of T2-T12 was measured by using a semiautomatic method on 146 computed tomographic scans of children (0-16 years old) without clinical or radiologic evidence of spinal pathology. Scans were mainly made for reasons such as recurrent respiratory tract infections, malignancies, or immune disorders. Vertebral rotational patterns were analyzed in the infantile (0-3-year-old), juvenile (4-9-year-old), and adolescent (10-16-year-old) boys and girls.
RESULTS: In the infantile spine, vertebrae T2-T6 were significantly rotated to the left (P < 0.001). In the juvenile spine, T4 was significantly rotated to the left. In the adolescent spine, T6-T12 were significantly rotated to the right (P ≤ 0.001). Rotation to the left was more pronounced in infantile boys than in the girls (P = 0.023). In juvenile and adolescent children, no statistical differences in rotation were found between the sexes.
CONCLUSION: These data support the hypothesis that the direction of the spinal curve in idiopathic scoliosis is determined by the built-in rotational pattern that the spine exhibits at the time of onset. The well-known predominance of right-sided thoracic curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and left-sided curves in infantile idiopathic scoliosis can be explained by the observed patterns of vertebral rotation that preexist at the corresponding age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21240053     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f468cc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  20 in total

1.  Coronal plane trunk asymmetry is associated with whole-body sagittal alignment in healthy young adolescents before pubertal peak growth.

Authors:  Mieke Dolphens; Andry Vleeming; René Castelein; Guy Vanderstraeten; Tom Schlösser; Frank Plasschaert; Lieven Danneels
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Scoliosis convexity and organ anatomy are related.

Authors:  Tom P C Schlösser; Tom Semple; Siobhán B Carr; Simon Padley; Michael R Loebinger; Claire Hogg; René M Castelein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Eye-hand laterality and right thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jean-François Catanzariti; Marc-Alexandre Guyot; Olivier Agnani; Samantha Demaille; Elisabeth Kolanowski; Cécile Donze
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Are there gender differences in sagittal spinal pelvic inclination before and after the adolescent pubertal growth spurt?

Authors:  Weijun Wang; Zhiwei Wang; Zhen Liu; Zezhang Zhu; Feng Zhu; Xu Sun; Tsz Ping Lam; Jack Chun-yiu Cheng; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis 3D vertebral morphology, progression and nomenclature: a current concepts review.

Authors:  Fraser R Labrom; Maree T Izatt; Andrew P Claus; J Paige Little
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-04-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Epidemiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Markus Rafael Konieczny; Hüsseyin Senyurt; Rüdiger Krauspe
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 1.548

Review 7.  A brief overview of 100 years of history of surgical treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Carol C Hasler
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 1.548

Review 8.  Pathogenesis and biomechanics of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Authors:  Fritz Hefti
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2013-01-13       Impact factor: 1.548

Review 9.  2016 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth.

Authors:  Stefano Negrini; Sabrina Donzelli; Angelo Gabriele Aulisa; Dariusz Czaprowski; Sanja Schreiber; Jean Claude de Mauroy; Helmut Diers; Theodoros B Grivas; Patrick Knott; Tomasz Kotwicki; Andrea Lebel; Cindy Marti; Toru Maruyama; Joe O'Brien; Nigel Price; Eric Parent; Manuel Rigo; Michele Romano; Luke Stikeleather; James Wynne; Fabio Zaina
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2018-01-10

10.  Concordance for curve type in idiopathic scoliosis among family members.

Authors:  Clarissa Miranda Carneiro de Albuquerque Olbertz; Jérôme Sales de Gauzy; Paulo Cezar Vidal Carneiro de Albuquerque; Frank Accadbled; Paula Eduarda Miranda Carneiro de Albuquerque; José Lamartine de Andrade Aguiar
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.