Literature DB >> 26376986

[Fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis : Anterior, posterior or combined? One-stage or two-stage?].

V Quack1, B Rath2, H Schenker2, A Schulze2, Y El Mansy2, M Tingart2, M Betsch2.   

Abstract

Scoliosis is a complex, three-dimensional spinal deformity with various causes. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is the most common form. Surgical treatment is indicated for curves greater than 45-50° meaured using the Cobb method. We can distinguish among posterior, anterior or combined surgical procedures. Today, the posterior, transpedicular approach has revolutionized scoliosis surgery. This review gives an overview of current surgical options in scoliosis treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Correction; Indication; Operative surgical procedures; Orthopedic fixation devices; Treatment outcome

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 26376986     DOI： 10.1007/s00132-015-3164-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN： 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  36 in total

1.  [Osteosynthesis of dorsal, lumbar, and lumbosacral spine with metallic plates screwed into vertebral pedicles and articular apophyses].

Authors:  R Roy-Camille; M Roy-Camille; C Demeulenaere
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 1.228

2.  An anterior approach to scoliosis. A preliminary report.

Authors:  A F Dwyer; N C Newton; A A Sherwood
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1969 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis.

Authors:  L G Lenke; R R Betz; J Harms; K H Bridwell; D H Clements; T G Lowe; K Blanke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the United States from 1997 to 2012: an analysis of 20,346 patients.

Authors:  Hari T Vigneswaran; Zachary J Grabel; Craig P Eberson; Mark A Palumbo; Alan H Daniels
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  R R Betz; J Harms; D H Clements; L G Lenke; T G Lowe; H L Shufflebarger; D Jeszenszky; B Beele
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Health and function of patients with untreated idiopathic scoliosis: a 50-year natural history study.

Authors:  Stuart L Weinstein; Lori A Dolan; Kevin F Spratt; Kirk K Peterson; Mark J Spoonamore; Ignacio V Ponseti
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-02-05       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Long-term outcomes of anterior dual-rod instrumentation for thoracolumbar and lumbar curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a twelve to twenty-three-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Hideki Sudo; Manabu Ito; Kiyoshi Kaneda; Yasuhiro Shono; Kuniyoshi Abumi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Computed tomography evaluation of rotation correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison of an all pedicle screw construct versus a hook-rod system.

Authors:  Jahangir Asghar; Amer F Samdani; Joshua M Pahys; Linda P D'andrea; James T Guille; David H Clements; Randal R Betz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Pedicle screw instrumentation for adult idiopathic scoliosis: an improvement over hook/hybrid fixation.

Authors:  Peter S Rose; Lawrence G Lenke; Keith H Bridwell; Daniel S Mulconrey; Geoffrey A Cronen; Jacob M Buchowski; Richard M Schwend; Brenda A Sides
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Patient factors are associated with poor short-term outcomes after posterior fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Bryce A Basques; Daniel D Bohl; Nicholas S Golinvaux; Brian G Smith; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 4.176
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.