Literature DB >> 24428277

Emerging techniques for dose optimization in abdominal CT.

Ravi K Kaza1, Joel F Platt, Mitchell M Goodsitt, Mahmoud M Al-Hawary, Katherine E Maturen, Ashish P Wasnik, Amit Pandya.   

Abstract

Recent advances in computed tomographic (CT) scanning technique such as automated tube current modulation (ATCM), optimized x-ray tube voltage, and better use of iterative image reconstruction have allowed maintenance of good CT image quality with reduced radiation dose. ATCM varies the tube current during scanning to account for differences in patient attenuation, ensuring a more homogeneous image quality, although selection of the appropriate image quality parameter is essential for achieving optimal dose reduction. Reducing the x-ray tube voltage is best suited for evaluating iodinated structures, since the effective energy of the x-ray beam will be closer to the k-edge of iodine, resulting in a higher attenuation for the iodine. The optimal kilovoltage for a CT study should be chosen on the basis of imaging task and patient habitus. The aim of iterative image reconstruction is to identify factors that contribute to noise on CT images with use of statistical models of noise (statistical iterative reconstruction) and selective removal of noise to improve image quality. The degree of noise suppression achieved with statistical iterative reconstruction can be customized to minimize the effect of altered image quality on CT images. Unlike with statistical iterative reconstruction, model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms model both the statistical noise and the physical acquisition process, allowing CT to be performed with further reduction in radiation dose without an increase in image noise or loss of spatial resolution. Understanding these recently developed scanning techniques is essential for optimization of imaging protocols designed to achieve the desired image quality with a reduced dose. © RSNA, 2014.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24428277      PMCID: PMC4319522          DOI: 10.1148/rg.341135038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  41 in total

Review 1.  Technical approaches to the optimisation of CT.

Authors:  Willi A Kalender; Stefanie Buchenau; Paul Deak; Markus Kellermeier; Oliver Langner; Marcel van Straten; Sabrina Vollmar; Sylvia Wilharm
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 2.685

2.  A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Thibault; Ken D Sauer; Charles A Bouman; Jiang Hsieh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Application- and patient size-dependent optimization of x-ray spectra for CT.

Authors:  Willi A Kalender; Paul Deak; Markus Kellermeier; Marcel van Straten; Sabrina V Vollmar
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Renal cyst pseudoenhancement at multidetector CT: what are the effects of number of detectors and peak tube voltage?

Authors:  Zhen J Wang; Fergus V Coakley; Yanjun Fu; Bonnie N Joe; Sven Prevrhal; Luis A Landeras; Emma M Webb; Benjamin M Yeh
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Using the K-edge to improve contrast conspicuity and to lower radiation dose with a 16-MDCT: a phantom and human study.

Authors:  Sanjeeva P Kalva; Dushyant V Sahani; Peter F Hahn; Sanjay Saini
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Statistical limitations in x-ray reconstructive tomography.

Authors:  R A Brooks; G Di Chiro
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1976 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study.

Authors:  Amy K Hara; Robert G Paden; Alvin C Silva; Jennifer L Kujak; Holly J Lawder; William Pavlicek
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  In defense of body CT.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Luís Guimarães; Joel G Fletcher
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults.

Authors:  Aaron Sodickson; Pieter F Baeyens; Katherine P Andriole; Luciano M Prevedello; Richard D Nawfel; Richard Hanson; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Andrew N Primak; Natalie Braun; James Kofler; Lifeng Yu; Jodie Christner
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.303

View more
  12 in total

1.  Optimizing radiation dose parameters in MDCT arthrography of the shoulder: illustration of basic concepts in a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Julien Aguet; Fabio Becce; Vincent Dunet; Alain Vlassenbroek; Emmanuel E Coche; Patrick Omoumi
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Emergency assessment of patients with acute abdominal pain using low-dose CT with iterative reconstruction: a comparative study.

Authors:  Pierre-Alexandre Poletti; Minerva Becker; Christoph D Becker; Alice Halfon Poletti; Olivier T Rutschmann; Habib Zaidi; Thomas Perneger; Alexandra Platon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  CT imaging of congenital lung lesions: effect of iterative reconstruction on diagnostic performance and radiation dose.

Authors:  Jay E Haggerty; Ethan A Smith; Shaun M Kunisaki; Jonathan R Dillman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-01-31

4.  Use of Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction (MBIR) in reduced-dose CT for routine follow-up of patients with malignant lymphoma: dose savings, image quality and phantom study.

Authors:  Edouard Hérin; François Gardavaud; Mélanie Chiaradia; Pauline Beaussart; Philippe Richard; Madeleine Cavet; Jean-François Deux; Corinne Haioun; Emmanuel Itti; Alain Rahmouni; Alain Luciani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Endoscopy and cross-sectional imaging for assessing Crohn׳s disease activity.

Authors:  Ryan W Stidham; Raymond K Cross
Journal:  Tech Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-07

6.  The potential for reduced radiation dose from deep learning-based CT image reconstruction: A comparison with filtered back projection and hybrid iterative reconstruction using a phantom.

Authors:  Ji Eun Lee; Seo-Youn Choi; Jeong Ah Hwang; Sanghyeok Lim; Min Hee Lee; Boem Ha Yi; Jang Gyu Cha
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 7.  Emerging clinical applications of computed tomography.

Authors:  Carlo Liguori; Giulia Frauenfelder; Carlo Massaroni; Paola Saccomandi; Francesco Giurazza; Francesca Pitocco; Riccardo Marano; Emiliano Schena
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2015-06-05

Review 8.  Postnatal Evaluation of Congenital Chest Pathologies Using a Low-Dose Computed Tomography (CT) Protocol - a Pictorial Review.

Authors:  Danuta Roik; Marzena Barczuk; Zofia Burzyńska; Agnieszka Biejat; Maria Żerańska; Magdalena Mierzewska-Schmidt; Tomasz Floriańczyk; Michał Brzewski
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2017-08-23

9.  The effect of vertical centering and scout direction on automatic tube voltage selection in chest CT: a preliminary phantom study on two different CT equipments.

Authors:  Touko Kaasalainen; Teemu Mäkelä; Mika Kortesniemi
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2018-12-17

10.  Low-Tube-Voltage CT Urography Using Low-Concentration-Iodine Contrast Media and Iterative Reconstruction: A Multi-Institutional Randomized Controlled Trial for Comparison with Conventional CT Urography.

Authors:  Sang Youn Kim; Jeong Yeon Cho; Joongyub Lee; Sung Il Hwang; Min Hoan Moon; Eun Ju Lee; Seong Sook Hong; Chan Kyo Kim; Kyeong Ah Kim; Sung Bin Park; Deuk Jae Sung; Yongsoo Kim; You Me Kim; Sung Il Jung; Sung Eun Rha; Dong Won Kim; Hyun Lee; Youngsup Shim; Inpyeong Hwang; Sungmin Woo; Hyuck Jae Choi
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.