Pierre-Alexandre Poletti1, Minerva Becker2, Christoph D Becker2, Alice Halfon Poletti3, Olivier T Rutschmann3, Habib Zaidi2, Thomas Perneger4, Alexandra Platon2. 1. Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Geneva, 4 rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland. pierre-alexandre.poletti@hcuge.ch. 2. Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Geneva, 4 rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland. 3. Department of Community, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. 4. Division of Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine if radiation dose delivered by contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) for acute abdominal pain can be reduced to the dose administered in abdominal radiography (<2.5 mSv) using low-dose CT (LDCT) with iterative reconstruction algorithms. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-one consecutive patients requiring CECT for acute abdominal pain were included, and their body mass index (BMI) was calculated. CECT was immediately followed by LDCT. LDCT series was processed using 1) 40% iterative reconstruction algorithm blended with filtered back projection (LDCT-IR-FBP) and 2) model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm (LDCT-MBIR). LDCT-IR-FBP and LDCT-MBIR images were reviewed independently by two board-certified radiologists (Raters 1 and 2). RESULTS: Abdominal pathology was revealed on CECT in 120 (79%) patients. In those with BMI <30, accuracies for correct diagnosis by Rater 1 with LDCT-IR-FBP and LDCT-MBIR, when compared to CECT, were 95.4% (104/109) and 99% (108/109), respectively, and 92.7% (101/109) and 100% (109/109) for Rater 2. In patients with BMI ≥30, accuracies with LDCT-IR-FBP and LDCT-MBIR were 88.1% (37/42) and 90.5% (38/42) for Rater 1 and 78.6% (33/42) and 92.9% (39/42) for Rater 2. CONCLUSIONS: The radiation dose delivered by CT to non-obese patients with acute abdominal pain can be safely reduced to levels close to standard radiography using LDCT-MBIR. KEY POINTS: • LDCT-MBIR (<2.5 mSv) can be used to assess acute abdominal pain. • LDCT-MBIR (<2.5 mSv) cannot safely assess acute abdominal pain in obese patients. • LDCT-IR-FBP (<2.5 mSv) cannot safely assess patients with acute abdominal pain.
OBJECTIVES: To determine if radiation dose delivered by contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) for acute abdominal pain can be reduced to the dose administered in abdominal radiography (<2.5 mSv) using low-dose CT (LDCT) with iterative reconstruction algorithms. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-one consecutive patients requiring CECT for acute abdominal pain were included, and their body mass index (BMI) was calculated. CECT was immediately followed by LDCT. LDCT series was processed using 1) 40% iterative reconstruction algorithm blended with filtered back projection (LDCT-IR-FBP) and 2) model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm (LDCT-MBIR). LDCT-IR-FBP and LDCT-MBIR images were reviewed independently by two board-certified radiologists (Raters 1 and 2). RESULTS: Abdominal pathology was revealed on CECT in 120 (79%) patients. In those with BMI <30, accuracies for correct diagnosis by Rater 1 with LDCT-IR-FBP and LDCT-MBIR, when compared to CECT, were 95.4% (104/109) and 99% (108/109), respectively, and 92.7% (101/109) and 100% (109/109) for Rater 2. In patients with BMI ≥30, accuracies with LDCT-IR-FBP and LDCT-MBIR were 88.1% (37/42) and 90.5% (38/42) for Rater 1 and 78.6% (33/42) and 92.9% (39/42) for Rater 2. CONCLUSIONS: The radiation dose delivered by CT to non-obesepatients with acute abdominal pain can be safely reduced to levels close to standard radiography using LDCT-MBIR. KEY POINTS: • LDCT-MBIR (<2.5 mSv) can be used to assess acute abdominal pain. • LDCT-MBIR (<2.5 mSv) cannot safely assess acute abdominal pain in obesepatients. • LDCT-IR-FBP (<2.5 mSv) cannot safely assess patients with acute abdominal pain.
Authors: Vijay M Rao; David C Levin; Laurence Parker; Andrea J Frangos; Jonathan H Sunshine Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Manuel Patino; Jorge M Fuentes; Koichi Hayano; Avinash R Kambadakone; Jennifer W Uyeda; Dushyant V Sahani Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Alexandra Platon; Helmi Jlassi; Olivier T Rutschmann; Christoph D Becker; Francis R Verdun; Pascal Gervaz; Pierre-Alexandre Poletti Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-09-17 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Nico Buls; Gert Van Gompel; Toon Van Cauteren; Koenraad Nieboer; Inneke Willekens; Guy Verfaillie; Paul Evans; Sven Macholl; Ben Newton; Johan de Mey Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-11-29 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Suvi Sippola; Juha Grönroos; Ville Sallinen; Tero Rautio; Pia Nordström; Tuomo Rantanen; Saija Hurme; Ari Leppäniemi; Sanna Meriläinen; Johanna Laukkarinen; Heini Savolainen; Johanna Virtanen; Paulina Salminen Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-11-03 Impact factor: 2.692