Literature DB >> 2623826

Interocular differences in contrast and spatial frequency: effects on stereopsis and fusion.

C Schor1, T Heckmann.   

Abstract

Anisometropia produces interocular differences in contrast and spatial frequency. The influence of these two parameters on Panum's fusional limit (PFL) and stereoscopic depth thresholds was investigated with sinusoidal gratings and one-dimensional band-pass-limited targets. Vertical fusion limits were unaffected by large interocular differences in contrast (40-10%) at two spatial frequencies (0.8 and 1.6 cpd). However, when tested with a low spatial frequency (0.8 cpd), stereothresholds increased 150% with an interocular difference in contrast as small as 50-25%. Stereoacuity was reduced less by differential contrast when tested with higher spatial frequencies (3.2 cpd). When tested with low spatial frequencies the stereothreshold was elevated more by reducing the contrast of one image than by equal contrast reductions of both ocular images. Stereothresholds appear to be elevated by binocular suppression evoked by interocular differences in contrast. Vertical as well as horizontal fusion limits decreased with increasing interocular size difference. Horizontal fusion limits fell off more gradually with increasing size difference than did vertical fusion limits, particularly at higher spatial frequencies (2.4 cpd). Similarly, stereothresholds increased with increasing interocular size differences. Changes in the fusion limit and stereothreshold that occur with interocular size differences are predicted from positional disparities between edge features rather than from differences in spatial frequency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2623826     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(89)90095-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  31 in total

1.  Contrast gain control in the visual cortex: monocular versus binocular mechanisms.

Authors:  A M Truchard; I Ohzawa; R D Freeman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Focus information is used to interpret binocular images.

Authors:  David M Hoffman; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Systematic misestimation in a vernier task arising from contrast mismatch.

Authors:  Hao Sun; Barry B Lee; Rigmor C Baraas
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 3.241

4.  Contrast gain-control in stereo depth and cyclopean contrast perception.

Authors:  Fang Hou; Chang-Bing Huang; Ju Liang; Yifeng Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 5.  Physiology of suppression in strabismic amblyopia.

Authors:  R Harrad; F Sengpiel; C Blakemore
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  A binocular perimetry study of the causes and implications of sensory eye dominance.

Authors:  Jingping P Xu; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Perceptual learning improves stereoacuity in amblyopia.

Authors:  Jie Xi; Wu-Li Jia; Li-Xia Feng; Zhong-Lin Lu; Chang-Bing Huang
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Panum's fusional area estimated with a criterion-free technique.

Authors:  T Heckmann; C M Schor
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-04

9.  Cues for the control of ocular accommodation and vergence during postnatal human development.

Authors:  Shrikant R Bharadwaj; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  2015 Charles F. Prentice Medal Award Lecture: Neural Organization of Binocular Vision.

Authors:  Ralph D Freeman
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.