Literature DB >> 28760867

Asymmetric Dichoptic Masking in Visual Cortex of Amblyopic Macaque Monkeys.

Christopher Shooner1, Luke E Hallum1, Romesh D Kumbhani1, Virginia García-Marín1, Jenna G Kelly1, Najib J Majaj1, J Anthony Movshon2, Lynne Kiorpes1.   

Abstract

In amblyopia, abnormal visual experience leads to an extreme form of eye dominance, in which vision through the nondominant eye is degraded. A key aspect of this disorder is perceptual suppression: the image seen by the stronger eye often dominates during binocular viewing, blocking the image of the weaker eye from reaching awareness. Interocular suppression is the focus of ongoing work aimed at understanding and treating amblyopia, yet its physiological basis remains unknown. We measured binocular interactions in visual cortex of anesthetized amblyopic monkeys (female Macaca nemestrina), using 96-channel "Utah" arrays to record from populations of neurons in V1 and V2. In an experiment reported recently (Hallum et al., 2017), we found that reduced excitatory input from the amblyopic eye (AE) revealed a form of balanced binocular suppression that is unaltered in amblyopia. Here, we report on the modulation of the gain of excitatory signals from the AE by signals from its dominant fellow eye (FE). Using a dichoptic masking technique, we found that AE responses to grating stimuli were attenuated by the presentation of a noise mask to the FE, as in a normal control animal. Responses to FE stimuli, by contrast, could not be masked from the AE. We conclude that a weakened ability of the amblyopic eye to modulate cortical response gain creates an imbalance of suppression that favors the dominant eye.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT In amblyopia, vision in one eye is impaired as a result of abnormal early visual experience. Behavioral observations in humans with amblyopia suggest that much of their visual loss is due to active suppression of their amblyopic eye. Here we describe experiments in which we studied binocular interactions in macaques with experimentally induced amblyopia. In normal monkeys, the gain of neuronal response to stimulation of one eye is modulated by contrast in the other eye, but in monkeys with amblyopia the balance of gain modulation is altered so that the weaker, amblyopic eye has little effect while the stronger fellow eye has a strong effect. This asymmetric suppression may be a key component of the perceptual losses in amblyopia.
Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/378734-08$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anisometropia; binocular interaction; dichoptic masking; macaque monkey; strabismus; visual cortex

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28760867      PMCID: PMC5588465          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1760-17.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  26 in total

1.  Nature and interaction of signals from the receptive field center and surround in macaque V1 neurons.

Authors:  James R Cavanaugh; Wyeth Bair; J Anthony Movshon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Binocular contrast vision at and above threshold.

Authors:  Tim S Meese; Mark A Georgeson; Daniel H Baker
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Contrast masking in strabismic amblyopia: attenuation, noise, interocular suppression and binocular summation.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Tim S Meese; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Binocular integration of contrast information in amblyopia.

Authors:  R A Harrad; R F Hess
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Binocular combination in abnormal binocular vision.

Authors:  Jian Ding; Stanley A Klein; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Dichoptic training enables the adult amblyopic brain to learn.

Authors:  Jinrong Li; Benjamin Thompson; Daming Deng; Lily Y L Chan; Minbin Yu; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Rebalancing binocular vision in amblyopia.

Authors:  Jian Ding; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Naso-temporal asymmetries in human amblyopia consequence of long-term interocular suppression.

Authors:  R Sireteanu; M Fronius
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Altered Balance of Receptive Field Excitation and Suppression in Visual Cortex of Amblyopic Macaque Monkeys.

Authors:  Luke E Hallum; Christopher Shooner; Romesh D Kumbhani; Jenna G Kelly; Virginia García-Marín; Najib J Majaj; J Anthony Movshon; Lynne Kiorpes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Binocular combination in anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  Chang-Bing Huang; Jiawei Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu; Lixia Feng; Yifeng Zhou
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  20 in total

1.  An action video game for the treatment of amblyopia in children: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Christina Gambacorta; Mor Nahum; Indu Vedamurthy; Jessica Bayliss; Josh Jordan; Daphne Bavelier; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Altered functional interactions between neurons in primary visual cortex of macaque monkeys with experimental amblyopia.

Authors:  Katerina Acar; Lynne Kiorpes; J Anthony Movshon; Matthew A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Understanding the development of amblyopia using macaque monkey models.

Authors:  Lynne Kiorpes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Amblyopia Affects the ON Visual Pathway More than the OFF.

Authors:  Carmen Pons; Jianzhong Jin; Reece Mazade; Mitchell Dul; Qasim Zaidi; Jose-Manuel Alonso
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Endogenous attention improves perception in amblyopic macaques.

Authors:  Amelie Pham; Marisa Carrasco; Lynne Kiorpes
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Binocular combination of luminance profiles.

Authors:  Jian Ding; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Altered Balance of Receptive Field Excitation and Suppression in Visual Cortex of Amblyopic Macaque Monkeys.

Authors:  Luke E Hallum; Christopher Shooner; Romesh D Kumbhani; Jenna G Kelly; Virginia García-Marín; Najib J Majaj; J Anthony Movshon; Lynne Kiorpes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Contrast Normalization Accounts for Binocular Interactions in Human Striate and Extra-striate Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Chuan Hou; Spero C Nicholas; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Rethinking amblyopia 2020.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 10.  The Importance of the Interaction Between Ocular Motor Function and Vision During Human Infancy.

Authors:  T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2019-09-15       Impact factor: 6.422

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.