Z-L Zhang1, X-q Shi, X-c Ma, G Li. 1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of spatial resolution and cone beam CT (CBCT) unit on CBCT images for the detection accuracy of condylar defects. METHODS: 42 temporomandibular joints were scanned, respectively, with the CBCT units ProMax® 3D (Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland) and DCT PRO (Vatech, Co., Ltd., Yongin-Si, Republic of Korea) at normal and high resolutions. Seven dentists evaluated all the test images with respect to the presence or the absence of condylar defects. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was employed to define the detection accuracy. Two-way analysis of variance was used to analyse the values under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the differences among imaging groups and observers. Intraobserver variation was analysed using the Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: Macroscopic anatomy examination revealed that, of the 42 temporomandibular joint condylar surfaces, 18 were normal and 24 had defects on the surface of condyles. No significant differences were found between the images scanned with normal and high resolutions for both CBCT units ProMax 3D (p = 0.119) and DCT PRO (p = 0.740). Significant differences exist between image groups of DCT PRO and ProMax 3D (p < 0.05). Neither the inter- nor the intraobserver variability were significant. CONCLUSIONS: The spatial resolution per se did not have an impact on the detection accuracy of condylar defects. The detection accuracy of condylar defects highly depends on the CBCT unit used for examination.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of spatial resolution and cone beam CT (CBCT) unit on CBCT images for the detection accuracy of condylar defects. METHODS: 42 temporomandibular joints were scanned, respectively, with the CBCT units ProMax® 3D (Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland) and DCT PRO (Vatech, Co., Ltd., Yongin-Si, Republic of Korea) at normal and high resolutions. Seven dentists evaluated all the test images with respect to the presence or the absence of condylar defects. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was employed to define the detection accuracy. Two-way analysis of variance was used to analyse the values under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the differences among imaging groups and observers. Intraobserver variation was analysed using the Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: Macroscopic anatomy examination revealed that, of the 42 temporomandibular joint condylar surfaces, 18 were normal and 24 had defects on the surface of condyles. No significant differences were found between the images scanned with normal and high resolutions for both CBCT units ProMax 3D (p = 0.119) and DCT PRO (p = 0.740). Significant differences exist between image groups of DCT PRO and ProMax 3D (p < 0.05). Neither the inter- nor the intraobserver variability were significant. CONCLUSIONS: The spatial resolution per se did not have an impact on the detection accuracy of condylar defects. The detection accuracy of condylar defects highly depends on the CBCT unit used for examination.
Authors: Oana Bida Honey; William Charles Scarfe; Michael J Hilgers; Kathleen Klueber; Anibal M Silveira; Bruce S Haskell; Allan G Farman Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 2.650
Authors: Zachary T Librizzi; Aditya S Tadinada; Jayasanker V Valiyaparambil; Alan G Lurie; Sanjay M Mallya Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 2.650
Authors: Christopher Schmidt; Rudolf Reich; Bernd Koos; Taila Ertel; Marcus Oliver Ahlers; Martin Arbogast; Ima Feurer; Mario Habermann-Krebs; Tim Hilgenfeld; Christian Hirsch; Boris Hügle; Thekla von Kalle; Johannes Kleinheinz; Andreas Kolk; Peter Ottl; Christoph Pautke; Merle Riechmann; Andreas Schön; Linda Skroch; Marcus Teschke; Wolfgang Wuest; Andreas Neff Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-03-22 Impact factor: 4.241