Literature DB >> 21724068

Cone-beam computed tomography to detect erosions of the temporomandibular joint: Effect of field of view and voxel size on diagnostic efficacy and effective dose.

Zachary T Librizzi1, Aditya S Tadinada, Jayasanker V Valiyaparambil, Alan G Lurie, Sanjay M Mallya.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In this study, we examined the influence of field of view (FOV) and voxel size on the diagnostic efficacy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans to detect erosions in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ).
METHODS: The sample consisted of 16 TMJs containing natural or artificially created erosions and 16 normal TMJs. CBCT scans were obtained with 3 imaging protocols differing in the FOV and the size of the reconstructed voxels. Two oral and maxillofacial radiologists scored the scans for the presence or absence of erosions. Diagnostic efficacies of the 3 imaging protocols were compared by using receiver operating curve analysis. For each TMJ imaging protocol, we used thermoluminescent dosimetry chips to measure the absorbed dose at specific organ and tissue sites. Effective doses for each examination were calculated.
RESULTS: Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.77 ± 0.05 for the 6-in FOV, 0.70 ± 0.08 for the 9-in FOV, and 0.66 ± 0.05 for the 12-in FOV. The diagnostic efficacy of the 6-in FOV, determined by the area under the curve, was significantly higher than that of the 12-in FOV (P ≤0.05). Effective doses for bilateral TMJ evaluation were 558 μSv for the 6-in FOV, 548 μSv for the 9-in FOV, and 916 μSv for the 12-in FOV.
CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic efficacy of CBCT scans for the evaluation of erosive changes in the TMJ is highest for the 6-in FOV and lowest for the 12-in FOV.
Copyright © 2011 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21724068     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  29 in total

Review 1.  Temporomandibular joint diagnostics using CBCT.

Authors:  T A Larheim; A-K Abrahamsson; M Kristensen; L Z Arvidsson
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Influence of object location in different FOVs on trabecular bone microstructure measurements of human mandible: a cone beam CT study.

Authors:  N Ibrahim; A Parsa; B Hassan; P van der Stelt; I H A Aartman; P Nambiar
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Comparison of the influence of FOV sizes and different voxel resolutions for the assessment of periodontal defects.

Authors:  M E Kolsuz; N Bagis; K Orhan; H Avsever; K Ö Demiralp
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 4.  Effective dose of cone beam CT (CBCT) of the facial skeleton: a systematic review.

Authors:  A Al-Okshi; C Lindh; H Salé; M Gunnarsson; M Rohlin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Evaluation of the effective dose of cone beam CT and multislice CT for temporomandibular joint examinations at optimized exposure levels.

Authors:  N Kadesjö; D Benchimol; B Falahat; K Näsström; X-Q Shi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Determination of optimum exposure parameters for dentoalveolar structures of the jaws using the CB MercuRay system with cluster signal-to-noise analysis.

Authors:  Warangkana Weerawanich; Mayumi Shimizu; Yohei Takeshita; Kazutoshi Okamura; Shoko Yoshida; Gainer R Jasa; Kazunori Yoshiura
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 7.  Impact of voxel size variation on CBCT-based diagnostic outcome in dentistry: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rubens Spin-Neto; Erik Gotfredsen; Ann Wenzel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Effective radiation dose and eye lens dose in dental cone beam CT: effect of field of view and angle of rotation.

Authors:  R Pauwels; G Zhang; C Theodorakou; A Walker; H Bosmans; R Jacobs; R Bogaerts; K Horner
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 9.  Clinical guidelines for dental cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Takafumi Hayashi; Yoshinori Arai; Toru Chikui; Sachiko Hayashi-Sakai; Kazuya Honda; Hiroko Indo; Taisuke Kawai; Kaoru Kobayashi; Shumei Murakami; Masako Nagasawa; Munetaka Naitoh; Eiji Nakayama; Yutaka Nikkuni; Hideyoshi Nishiyama; Noriaki Shoji; Shigeaki Suenaga; Ray Tanaka
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 1.852

10.  Detection accuracy of condylar bony defects in Promax 3D cone beam CT images scanned with different protocols.

Authors:  Z-L Zhang; J-G Cheng; G Li; X-Q Shi; J-Z Zhang; Z-Y Zhang; X-C Ma
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 2.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.