Literature DB >> 24407627

Finished Genome of Zymomonas mobilis subsp. mobilis Strain CP4, an Applied Ethanol Producer.

Vassili N Kouvelis1, Hazuki Teshima, David Bruce, Chris Detter, Roxanne Tapia, Cliff Han, Vassileia-Olga Tampakopoulou, Lynne Goodwin, Tanja Woyke, Nikos C Kyrpides, Milton A Typas, Katherine M Pappas.   

Abstract

Zymomonas mobilis subsp. mobilis is one of the most rigorous ethanol-producing organisms known to date, considered by many to be the prokaryotic alternative to yeast. The two most applied Z. mobilis subsp. mobilis strains, ZM4 and CP4, derive from Recife, Brazil, and have been isolated from sugarcane fermentations. Of these, ZM4 was the first Z. mobilis representative strain to be sequenced and analyzed. Here, we report the finishing of the genome sequence of strain CP4, which is highly similar but not identical to that of ZM4.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24407627      PMCID: PMC3886940          DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00845-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Announc


GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Zymomonas mobilis subsp. mobilis strain CP4, formerly known as Z. mobilis var. recifensis (1), is a most aerotolerant, quickly growing, and ethanol-yielding Z. mobilis strain (2, 3). CP4 and its kin strain Zmobilis subsp. mobilis ZM4 originate from the same source at Recife, Brazil (4, 5), and are known to reach theoretical maxima of ethanol production when grown on glucose substrates (6). Both strains have undergone numerous independent genetic manipulations in order to be optimized for ligninocellulosic biomass fermentations (3, 6–8). Despite their wide applications, controversy exists as to whether these strains are different or identical; although they have distinct plasmid profiles (5), they are currently considered the same strain by bacterial repositories, including the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC 31821 [http://www.lgcstandards-atcc.org/products/all/31821]). The finishing of the genome sequence of CP4 unequivocally proves that CP4 is not identical to ZM4. Total DNA from CP4 was prepared as described previously (9). The genome sequence was generated at the Department of Energy (DOE) Joint Genome Institute (JGI) (http://www.jgi.doe.gov/) using a combination of Sanger, Illumina (10), and 454 technologies (11). To this end, a Sanger library (average insert size of 6.6 ± 1.6 kb), a 454 Titanium standard library (395,449 reads), two paired-end 454 libraries (average insert sizes of 4.6 ± 1.1 bp and 25.1 ± 6.3 kb), and an Illumina GAII shotgun library were constructed, generating sequence reads totaling 2.1 Mb, 202.0 Mb, and 222 Mb, respectively. The 454 and Illumina data were assembled with Newbler version 2.3 and Velvet version 0.7.63, respectively (12). The Sanger reads, the 454 Newbler consensus shreds, the read pairs in the 454 paired-end library, and the Illumina Velvet consensus shreds were integrated using parallel Phrap version SPS-4.24 (High Performance Software, LLC). The software Consed (13–15) was used for finishing. The Illumina data were used to increase consensus quality using the software Polisher developed at JGI (A. Lapidus, unpublished data). Possible misassemblies were corrected using Gap Resolution (C. Han, unpublished data), dupFinisher (16), or sequencing bridging PCR fragments after subcloning. The gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR, and by Bubble PCR primer walks (J.-F. Cheng, unpublished data). The final assembly is based on data providing coverage of the genome up to 106-fold. Coding gene prediction, functional gene assignment, and tRNA/rRNA identification were determined as described before (17). Genome structure comparisons relied on ACT (18), BLASTn (19), and MegaBLAST (20). The genome of CP4 comprises a circular chromosome of 1,998,637 bp and five plasmids, pCP4_1 to pCP4_5, of 36,892 bp, 33,915 bp, 32,400 bp, 30,952 bp, and 30,440 bp, respectively (G+C contents of 46.24% for the chromosome and of 42.39%, 42.28%, 43.69%, 43.70%, and 42.68% for the five plasmids, respectively). It has 1,860 protein-coding genes, 48 tRNA genes, and 2 rRNA gene clusters. The CP4 genome is 57,727 bp smaller than that of ZM4 (21) and shares syntenic units that locally reach 99% identity. However, four stretches within the CP4 chromosome totaling 20,452 bp (coordinates 110280 to 121208, 1243209 to 1246778, 1259989 to 1262157, and 1552432 to 1554025) and 18 genes are unique to the strain compared to ZM4; conversely, 15 regions totaling 74,674 bp and 58 genes are unique to ZM4. The CP4 plasmids harbor housekeeping and accessory genes (host-beneficial or other), as well as genes of phage origin, located on pCP4_1.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The CP4 genome was assigned GenBank accession no. CP006818 for the chromosome and CP006891 to CP006895 for the plasmids.
  18 in total

1.  A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences.

Authors:  Z Zhang; S Schwartz; L Wagner; W Miller
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2000 Feb-Apr       Impact factor: 1.479

Review 2.  The biology of Zymomonas.

Authors:  J Swings; J De Ley
Journal:  Bacteriol Rev       Date:  1977-03

3.  Solexa Ltd.

Authors:  Simon Bennett
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.533

4.  Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs.

Authors:  Daniel R Zerbino; Ewan Birney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Improved genome annotation for Zymomonas mobilis.

Authors:  Shihui Yang; Katherine M Pappas; Loren J Hauser; Miriam L Land; Gwo-Liang Chen; Gregory B Hurst; Chongle Pan; Vassili N Kouvelis; Milton A Typas; Dale A Pelletier; Dawn M Klingeman; Yun-Juan Chang; Nagiza F Samatova; Steven D Brown
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities.

Authors:  B Ewing; P Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing.

Authors:  D Gordon; C Abajian; P Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Genome sequence of the ethanol-producing Zymomonas mobilis subsp. mobilis lectotype strain ATCC 10988.

Authors:  Katherine M Pappas; Vassili N Kouvelis; Elizabeth Saunders; Thomas S Brettin; David Bruce; Chris Detter; Mariya Balakireva; Cliff S Han; Giannis Savvakis; Nikos C Kyrpides; Milton A Typas
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Transposon mutagenesis and strain construction in Zymomonas mobilis.

Authors:  K M Pappas; I Galani; M A Typas
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.772

Review 10.  Zymomonas mobilis for fuel ethanol and higher value products.

Authors:  P L Rogers; Y J Jeon; K J Lee; H G Lawford
Journal:  Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.635

View more
  9 in total

1.  Improved high-temperature ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice using Zymomonas mobilis overexpressing groESL genes.

Authors:  Anchittha Kaewchana; Atiya Techaparin; Nongluck Boonchot; Pornthap Thanonkeo; Preekamol Klanrit
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Zymomonas mobilis: a novel platform for future biorefineries.

Authors:  Ming Xiong He; Bo Wu; Han Qin; Zhi Yong Ruan; Fu Rong Tan; Jing Li Wang; Zong Xia Shui; Li Chun Dai; Qi Li Zhu; Ke Pan; Xiao Yu Tang; Wen Guo Wang; Qi Chun Hu
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 6.040

3.  Genome Sequence of Zymomonas mobilis subsp. mobilis NRRL B-1960.

Authors:  Katherine Chacon-Vargas; Alexandra A Chirino; Meghan M Davis; Sophia A Debler; Wynn Raphael Haimer; Justin J Wilbur; Xiaoli Mo; Baxter W Worthing; Ethan G Wainblat; Shu Zhao; John G Gibbons
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2017-07-27

Review 4.  Zymomonas mobilis as a model system for production of biofuels and biochemicals.

Authors:  Shihui Yang; Qiang Fei; Yaoping Zhang; Lydia M Contreras; Sagar M Utturkar; Steven D Brown; Michael E Himmel; Min Zhang
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 5.813

5.  Genome comparison of different Zymomonas mobilis strains provides insights on conservation of the evolution.

Authors:  Chen Chen; Linfeng Wu; Qinghua Cao; Huanhuan Shao; Xuedan Li; Yizheng Zhang; Haiyan Wang; Xuemei Tan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Complete genome sequence and the expression pattern of plasmids of the model ethanologen Zymomonas mobilis ZM4 and its xylose-utilizing derivatives 8b and 2032.

Authors:  Shihui Yang; Jessica M Vera; Yaoping Zhang; Jeff Grass; Giannis Savvakis; Oleg V Moskvin; Yongfu Yang; Sean J McIlwain; Yucai Lyu; Irene Zinonos; Alexander S Hebert; Joshua J Coon; Donna M Bates; Trey K Sato; Steven D Brown; Michael E Himmel; Min Zhang; Robert Landick; Katherine M Pappas
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 6.040

7.  Genomic profiling of bacterial and fungal communities and their predictive functionality during pulque fermentation by whole-genome shotgun sequencing.

Authors:  Katherine Chacón-Vargas; Julian Torres; Martha Giles-Gómez; Adelfo Escalante; John G Gibbons
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Establishment and application of a CRISPR-Cas12a assisted genome-editing system in Zymomonas mobilis.

Authors:  Wei Shen; Jun Zhang; Binan Geng; Mengyue Qiu; Mimi Hu; Qing Yang; Weiwei Bao; Yubei Xiao; Yanli Zheng; Wenfang Peng; Guimin Zhang; Lixin Ma; Shihui Yang
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 5.328

9.  Zymomonas diversity and potential for biofuel production.

Authors:  Magdalena M Felczak; Robert M Bowers; Tanja Woyke; Michaela A TerAvest
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 7.670

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.