Literature DB >> 30140892

Sensory and decision-making processes underlying perceptual adaptation.

Nathan Witthoft1,2, Long Sha3, Jonathan Winawer4, Roozbeh Kiani4,5.   

Abstract

Perceptual systems adapt to their inputs. As a result, prolonged exposure to particular stimuli alters judgments about subsequent stimuli. This phenomenon is commonly assumed to be sensory in origin. Changes in the decision-making process, however, may also be a component of adaptation. Here, we quantify sensory and decision-making contributions to adaptation in a facial expression paradigm. As expected, exposure to happy or sad expressions shifts the psychometric function toward the adaptor. More surprisingly, response times show both an overall decline and an asymmetry, with faster responses opposite the adapting category, implicating a substantial change in the decision-making process. Specifically, we infer that sensory changes from adaptation are accompanied by changes in how much sensory information is accumulated for the two choices. We speculate that adaptation influences implicit expectations about the stimuli one will encounter, causing modifications in the decision-making process as part of a normative response to a change in context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30140892      PMCID: PMC6108310          DOI: 10.1167/18.8.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  55 in total

1.  Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice.

Authors:  Ian Krajbich; Carrie Armel; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces.

Authors:  David A Leopold; Gillian Rhodes; Kai-Markus Müller; Linda Jeffery
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.026

Review 4.  Visual adaptation: physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits.

Authors:  Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Retinotopy of the face aftereffect.

Authors:  Seyed-Reza Afraz; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Dynamics of neural population responses in prefrontal cortex indicate changes of mind on single trials.

Authors:  Roozbeh Kiani; Christopher J Cueva; John B Reppas; William T Newsome
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Sustained attention is not necessary for velocity adaptation.

Authors:  Michael Morgan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  What is adapted in face adaptation? The neural representations of expression in the human visual system.

Authors:  Christopher J Fox; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Rats and humans can optimally accumulate evidence for decision-making.

Authors:  Bingni W Brunton; Matthew M Botvinick; Carlos D Brody
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Adaptation maintains population homeostasis in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Andrea Benucci; Aman B Saleem; Matteo Carandini
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  5 in total

1.  Positive hysteresis in emotion recognition: Face processing visual regions are involved in perceptual persistence, which mediates interactions between anterior insula and medial prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Andreia Verdade; Teresa Sousa; João Castelhano; Miguel Castelo-Branco
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 3.526

2.  Linear Integration of Sensory Evidence over Space and Time Underlies Face Categorization.

Authors:  Gouki Okazawa; Long Sha; Roozbeh Kiani
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Adaptation aftereffects reveal how categorization training changes the encoding of face identity.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Karla Escobar; Jefferson Salan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  How positive emotional content overrules perceptual history effects: Hysteresis in emotion recognition.

Authors:  Andreia Verdade; João Castelhano; Teresa Sousa; Miguel Castelo-Branco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  The implied motion aftereffect changes decisions, but not confidence.

Authors:  Regan M Gallagher; Thomas Suddendorf; Derek H Arnold
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 2.199

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.