Literature DB >> 22950887

Shifts of the psychometric function: distinguishing bias from perceptual effects.

Miguel A García-Pérez1, Rocío Alcalá-Quintana.   

Abstract

Morgan, Dillenburger, Raphael, and Solomon have shown that observers can use different response strategies when unsure of their answer, and, thus, they can voluntarily shift the location of the psychometric function estimated with the method of single stimuli (MSS; sometimes also referred to as the single-interval, two-alternative method). They wondered whether MSS could distinguish response bias from a true perceptual effect that would also shift the location of the psychometric function. We demonstrate theoretically that the inability to distinguish response bias from perceptual effects is an inherent shortcoming of MSS, although a three-response format including also an "undecided" response option may solve the problem under restrictive assumptions whose validity cannot be tested with MSS data. We also show that a proper two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) task with the three-response format is free of all these problems so that bias and perceptual effects can easily be separated out. The use of a three-response 2AFC format is essential to eliminate a confound (response bias) in studies of perceptual effects and, hence, to eliminate a threat to the internal validity of research in this area.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22950887     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2012.708761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  34 in total

Review 1.  Dynamics of individual perceptual decisions.

Authors:  Daniel M Merfeld; Torin K Clark; Yue M Lu; Faisal Karmali
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Whole body motion-detection tasks can yield much lower thresholds than direction-recognition tasks: implications for the role of vibration.

Authors:  Shomesh E Chaudhuri; Faisal Karmali; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Visual illusion of tool use recalibrates tactile perception.

Authors:  Luke E Miller; Matthew R Longo; Ayse P Saygin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-02-11

4.  Visuospatial selective attention in chickens.

Authors:  Devarajan Sridharan; Deepa L Ramamurthy; Jason S Schwarz; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Does the Superior Colliculus Control Perceptual Sensitivity or Choice Bias during Attention? Evidence from a Multialternative Decision Framework.

Authors:  Devarajan Sridharan; Nicholas A Steinmetz; Tirin Moore; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  On the discrepant results in synchrony judgment and temporal-order judgment tasks: a quantitative model.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez; Rocío Alcalá-Quintana
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

7.  Distinguishing bias from sensitivity effects in multialternative detection tasks.

Authors:  Devarajan Sridharan; Nicholas A Steinmetz; Tirin Moore; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  A bias-free measure of retinotopic tilt adaptation.

Authors:  M J Morgan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  The bisection point across variants of the task.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez; Eli Peli
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Perception of threshold-level whole-body motion during mechanical mastoid vibration.

Authors:  Rakshatha Kabbaligere; Charles S Layne; Faisal Karmali
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.435

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.