Literature DB >> 19853246

A motion aftereffect from visual imagery of motion.

Jonathan Winawer1, Alexander C Huk, Lera Boroditsky.   

Abstract

Mental imagery is thought to share properties with perception. To what extent does the process of imagining a scene share neural circuits and computational mechanisms with actually perceiving the same scene? Here, we investigated whether mental imagery of motion in a particular direction recruits neural circuits tuned to the same direction of perceptual motion. To address this question we made use of a visual illusion, the motion aftereffect. We found that following prolonged imagery of motion in one direction, people are more likely to perceive real motion test probes as moving in the direction opposite to the direction of motion imagery. The transfer of adaptation from imagined to perceived motion provides evidence that motion imagery and motion perception recruit shared direction-selective neural circuitry. Even in the absence of any visual stimuli, people can selectively recruit specific low-level sensory neurons through mental imagery. Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19853246     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  24 in total

1.  Observers can voluntarily shift their psychometric functions without losing sensitivity.

Authors:  Michael Morgan; Barbara Dillenburger; Sabine Raphael; Joshua A Solomon
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Wohlgemuth was right: distracting attention from the adapting stimulus does not decrease the motion after-effect.

Authors:  Michael J Morgan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-07-31       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  A bias-free measure of retinotopic tilt adaptation.

Authors:  M J Morgan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Inferring the direction of implied motion depends on visual awareness.

Authors:  Nathan Faivre; Christof Koch
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 5.  Adaptation and visual coding.

Authors:  Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Disentangling visual imagery and perception of real-world objects.

Authors:  Sue-Hyun Lee; Dwight J Kravitz; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Visual Adaptation.

Authors:  Michael A Webster
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 6.422

8.  Are things that are hard to physically move also hard to imagine moving?

Authors:  Stephen J Flusberg; Lera Boroditsky
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-02

9.  Sensory and decision-making processes underlying perceptual adaptation.

Authors:  Nathan Witthoft; Long Sha; Jonathan Winawer; Roozbeh Kiani
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Learning, memory, and synesthesia.

Authors:  Nathan Witthoft; Jonathan Winawer
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-01-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.