Literature DB >> 22186273

Why do shape aftereffects increase with eccentricity?

Elena Gheorghiu1, Frederick A A Kingdom, Jason Bell, Rick Gurnsey.   

Abstract

Studies have shown that spatial aftereffects increase with eccentricity. Here, we demonstrate that the shape-frequency and shape-amplitude aftereffects, which describe the perceived shifts in the shape of a sinusoidal-shaped contour following adaptation to a slightly different sinusoidal-shaped contour, also increase with eccentricity. Why does this happen? We first demonstrate that the perceptual shift increases with eccentricity for stimuli of fixed sizes. These shifts are not attenuated by variations in stimulus size; in fact, at each eccentricity the degree of perceptual shift is scale-independent. This scale independence is specific to the aftereffect because basic discrimination thresholds (in the absence of adaptation) decrease as size increases. Structural aspects of the displays were found to have a modest effect on the degree of perceptual shift; the degree of adaptation depends modestly on distance between stimuli during adaptation and post-adaptation testing. There were similar temporal rates of decline of adaptation across the visual field and higher post-adaptation discrimination thresholds in the periphery than in the center. The observed results are consistent with greater sensitivity reduction in adapted mechanisms following adaptation in the periphery or an eccentricity-dependent increase in the bandwidth of the shape-frequency- and shape-amplitude-selective mechanisms.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22186273     DOI: 10.1167/11.14.18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  5 in total

1.  A bias-free measure of retinotopic tilt adaptation.

Authors:  M J Morgan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Blur Adaptation to Central Retinal Disease.

Authors:  Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz; Russell L Woods; Eli Peli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Facial Expression Aftereffect Revealed by Adaption to Emotion-Invisible Dynamic Bubbled Faces.

Authors:  Chengwen Luo; Qingyun Wang; Philippe G Schyns; Frederick A A Kingdom; Hong Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Dynamics of contrast adaptation in central and peripheral vision.

Authors:  Yi Gao; Michael A Webster; Fang Jiang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 5.  Linking hypotheses underlying Class A and Class B methods.

Authors:  M J Morgan; D Melmoth; J A Solomon
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.