| Literature DB >> 24403104 |
Jangchul Park1, Hidekazu Yamaura, Yasushi Yatabe, Waki Hosoda, Chiaki Kondo, Junichi Shimizu, Yoshitsugu Horio, Kimihide Yoshida, Kosuke Tanaka, Tomoyo Oguri, Yoshihisa Kobayashi, Toyoaki Hida.
Abstract
Few articles have been published on the imaging findings of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To investigate the radiological findings of ALK-positive NSCLC in the advanced stage, CT scans were examined. In addition, the response to chemotherapy was evaluated. Of the 36 patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC, a mass and a nodule were identified in 17 (47.2%) and 16 (44.4%), respectively, indicating that more than 40% had a small-sized tumor. Overall, 31 (86.1%) patients had lymphadenopathy, seven (19.4%) had extranodal lymph node invasion, and three (8.3%) had lymphangitis. A pleural effusion was seen in 15 patients (41.7%). All but one patient had no ground-glass opacity (GGO) lesions, indicating that most ALK-positive tumors showed a solid growth pattern without GGO on CT. Twenty were evaluable for response to chemotherapy; 10 (50.0%) had a partial response (PR), nine (45.0%) had stable disease (SD), and one (5.0%) had progressive disease (PD) with first-line chemotherapy. With second-line chemotherapy, five (26.3%) had PR, 11 (57.9%) had SD, and three (15.8%) had PD. The five patients with PR were all treated by using crizotinib. Time to progression was 8.2 months with first-line chemotherapy, and 6.0 months with second-line chemotherapy. Advanced-stage ALK-positive tumors have a relatively aggressive phenotype, which cannot be inferred from the size of the tumor alone. ALK-positive patients have a good response to first-line cytotoxic drugs and to crizotinib as second-line therapy, but a relatively poor response to cytotoxic drugs as second-line therapy.Entities:
Keywords: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase; chemotherapy; computed tomography; ground-glass opacity; lung cancer
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24403104 PMCID: PMC3930396 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.172
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Med ISSN: 2045-7634 Impact factor: 4.452
Figure 1ALK, IHC, FISH, and sequence electropherogram of a lung adenocarcinoma with ALK rearrangement. ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase.
Figure 2Thoracic CT findings from representative patients in ALK-positive NSCLC. (A) mass, (B) nodule, and (C) consolidation. ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer.
Figure 3Representative cut of thoracic CT scan showing extranodal invasion of lymph nodes.
Clinical features and CT scan findings of advanced ALK-positive lung cancer.
| Chest CT findings | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case | Gender/age (y) | Smoking history | Stage (TNM) | Detection method for ALK rearrangement | Mass/nodule | Consolidation | Any GGO | Adenopathy hilar/mediastinal/subclavicular | Pleural effusion | Lymphangitis |
| 1 | F/57 | 0 | T2bN3M1a—IV | F, I | +/− | − | − | −/+/− | + | − |
| 2 | M/57 | 0 | T1bN0M1a—IV | F, I | −/+ | − | − | −/−/− | + | − |
| 3 | M/66 | 33 | T3N3M1a—IV | F, I | +/− | − | − | +/+/− | + | − |
| 4 | F/46 | 0 | T3N2M0—IIIA | F, I | +/− | − | − | −/+/− | − | − |
| 5 | F/26 | 13 | T4N3M1b—IV | F, I, P | −/+ | − | − | −/−/+ | + | − |
| 6 | M/32 | 6 | T3N0M1a—IV | F | −/+ | + | + | −/−/− | + | + |
| 7 | F/57 | 0 | T3N3M1b—IV | F, I | −/+ | − | − | −/−/+ | − | − |
| 8 | F/31 | 0 | T1aN3M1b—IV | F, I | −/+ | − | − | +/+/− | − | − |
| 9 | F/28 | 0 | T3N3M1b—IV | F | −/− | + | − | +/+/− | − | + |
| 10 | F/79 | 0 | T2bN3M0—IIIB | F, I, P | +/− | − | − | +/+/− | − | − |
| 11 | M/40 | 11 | T4N3M1b—IV | F | +/− | − | − | −/+/+ | − | − |
| 12 | F/60 | 0 | T1bN1M1b—IV | F | −/+ | − | − | +/−/− | − | − |
| 13 | M/59 | 59 | T3N3M1b—IV | F, I | −/− | + | − | +/+/− | − | − |
| 14 | F/36 | 8 | T2bN3M1b—IV | F, I | +/− | − | − | +/+/− | − | − |
| 15 | M/34 | 14 | T2bN3M1b—IV | F | +/− | − | − | −/+/− | − | − |
| 16 | F/37 | 8 | T1aN3M1b—IV | F, I | −/+ | − | − | +/+/+ | − | − |
| 17 | M/38 | 8 | T4N3M1a—IV | F, I, P | +/− | − | − | +/+/− | + | − |
| 18 | F/58 | 0 | T1bN2M1a—IV | F, I, P | −/+ | − | − | −/+/− | + | − |
| 19 | M/41 | 0 | T4N2M1b—IV | F, I | +/− | − | − | +/+/− | + | − |
| 20 | M/34 | 0 | T4N1M1b—IV | F, P | +/− | − | − | +/−/− | − | − |
| 21 | F/59 | 0 | T4N2M1b—IV | F, I | −/+ | − | − | +/+/− | − | − |
| 22 | F/54 | 0 | T1bN0M1a—IV | P | −/+ | − | − | −/−/− | + | − |
| 23 | M/32 | 7 | T4N1M1b—IV | F, I, P | −/− | + | − | +/−/− | − | − |
| 24 | F/64 | 0 | T4N3M1b—IV | I, P | +/− | − | − | +/+/− | + | − |
| 25 | M/39 | 13 | T3N1M1b—IV | F, I, P | +/− | − | − | +/−/− | + | − |
| 26 | F/36 | 15 | T4N1M1b—IV | F, I | +/− | − | − | +/−/− | + | + |
| 27 | F/63 | 5 | T2aN2M1b—IV | I, P | +/− | − | − | +/+/− | − | − |
| 28 | M/40 | 22 | T1bN3M1b—IV | F, I | −/+ | − | − | +/+/− | − | − |
| 29 | F/49 | 0 | T4N2M1b—IV | F, I | −/+ | − | − | +/+/− | + | − |
| 30 | M/56 | 2 | T4N3M1b—IV | F | −/+ | − | − | −/+/− | − | − |
| 31 | F/57 | 6 | T4N0M1a—IV | F, I | +/− | − | − | −/−/− | − | − |
| 32 | M/61 | 4 | T1bN2M0—IIIA | F, I | −/+ | − | − | +/+/− | − | − |
| 33 | F/62 | 0 | T4N2M1b—IV | F, I, P | +/− | − | − | +/+/− | − | − |
| 34 | F/35 | 0 | T2aN3M0—IIIB | F, I, P | +/− | − | − | +/+/+ | − | − |
| 35 | F/70 | 0 | T1aN0M1a—IV | F, I | −/+ | − | − | −/−/− | + | − |
| 36 | F/48 | 0 | T1bN2M1b—IV | F, I | −/+ | − | − | −/+/− | + | − |
GGO, ground-glass opacity; TNM, tumor–node–metastasis; F, FISH; I, IHC; P, PCR; +, present; −, absent.
Smoking history: pack-years.
Treatment responses to anticancer agents or crizotinib.
| First-line | Second-line | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case | Regimen | Response | TTP (months) | Regimen | Response | TTP (months) |
| 1 | CBDCA + PTX | PR | 4.4 | DTX | PD | 1.3 |
| 2 | CBDCA + PTX | PR | 4.7 | CBDCA + VNR | SD | 3.1 |
| 3 | CBDCA + S-1 | SD | 5.8 | DTX | PD | 1.4 |
| 4 | CBDCA + PTX + RT | PR | 18.1 | DTX | SD | 4.9 |
| 5 | CBDCA + PTX | PR | 6.8 | Crizotinib | PR | 25.3 |
| 6 | CDDP + DTX | PR | 7.6 | PEM | SD | 4.0 |
| 7 | CBDCA + PEM | SD | 7.2 | DTX | SD | 5.4 |
| 8 | CDDP/CBDCA | SD | 3.4 | Crizotinib | PD | 1.5 |
| 9 | CDDP + PEM | PR | 7.5 | DTX | SD | 2.6 |
| 10 | S-1 | SD | 23.1 | PEM | SD | 7.7 |
| 11 | CBDCA + PTX | SD | 6.3 | PEM | SD | 1.6 |
| 12 | CDDP + PEM | PR | 6.9 | Crizotinib | SD | 5.5 |
| 13 | CBDCA + DTX + BEV | SD | 2.6 | Crizotinib | PR | 5.6 |
| 14 | CDDP + PEM | PR | 8.3 | Crizotinib | PR | 7.8 |
| 15 | CBDCA + PEM | SD | 6.3 | Crizotinib | SD | 4.9 |
| 16 | CBDCA + PEM | PR | 13.2 | Crizotinib | PR | 4.6 |
| 17 | CBDCA + PEM | PD | 0.8 | Crizotinib | PR | 10.3 |
| 18 | Crizotinib | PR | 10.9 | BSC | NA | NA |
| 19 | Crizotinib | SD | 15.8 | CDDP + PEM | SD | >3.8 |
| 20 | CDDP + PEM | SD | 4.0 | Crizotinib | SD | 10.0 |
CBDCA, carboplatin; CDDP, cisplatin; PTX, paclitaxel; DTX, docetaxel; PEM, pemetrexed; VNR, vinorelbine; BEV, bevacizumab; S-1, oral fluorouracil anticancer drug; RT, radiation therapy; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease; TTP, Time to progression; BSC, best supportive care; NA, not applicable.
Cisplatin was used only for one cycle, followed by carboplatin.
Followed by maintenance pemetrexed therapy.