PURPOSE: The EML4-ALK fusion oncogene represents a novel molecular target in a small subset of non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC). To aid in identification and treatment of these patients, we examined the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients who had NSCLC with and without EML4-ALK. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with NSCLC were selected for genetic screening on the basis of two or more of the following characteristics: female sex, Asian ethnicity, never/light smoking history, and adenocarcinoma histology. EML4-ALK was identified by using fluorescent in situ hybridization for ALK rearrangements and was confirmed by immunohistochemistry for ALK expression. EGFR and KRAS mutations were determined by DNA sequencing. RESULTS: Of 141 tumors screened, 19 (13%) were EML4-ALK mutant, 31 (22%) were EGFR mutant, and 91 (65%) were wild type (WT/WT) for both ALK and EGFR. Compared with the EGFR mutant and WT/WT cohorts, patients with EML4-ALK mutant tumors were significantly younger (P < .001 and P = .005) and were more likely to be men (P = .036 and P = .039). Patients with EML4-ALK-positive tumors, like patients who harbored EGFR mutations, also were more likely to be never/light smokers compared with patients in the WT/WT cohort (P < .001). Eighteen of the 19 EML4-ALK tumors were adenocarcinomas, predominantly the signet ring cell subtype. Among patients with metastatic disease, EML4-ALK positivity was associated with resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Patients in the EML4-ALK cohort and the WT/WT cohort showed similar response rates to platinum-based combination chemotherapy and no difference in overall survival. CONCLUSION: EML4-ALK defines a molecular subset of NSCLC with distinct clinical characteristics. Patients who harbor this mutation do not benefit from EGFR TKIs and should be directed to trials of ALK-targeted agents.
PURPOSE: The EML4-ALK fusion oncogene represents a novel molecular target in a small subset of non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC). To aid in identification and treatment of these patients, we examined the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients who had NSCLC with and without EML4-ALK. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with NSCLC were selected for genetic screening on the basis of two or more of the following characteristics: female sex, Asian ethnicity, never/light smoking history, and adenocarcinoma histology. EML4-ALK was identified by using fluorescent in situ hybridization for ALK rearrangements and was confirmed by immunohistochemistry for ALK expression. EGFR and KRAS mutations were determined by DNA sequencing. RESULTS: Of 141 tumors screened, 19 (13%) were EML4-ALK mutant, 31 (22%) were EGFR mutant, and 91 (65%) were wild type (WT/WT) for both ALK and EGFR. Compared with the EGFR mutant and WT/WT cohorts, patients with EML4-ALK mutant tumors were significantly younger (P < .001 and P = .005) and were more likely to be men (P = .036 and P = .039). Patients with EML4-ALK-positive tumors, like patients who harbored EGFR mutations, also were more likely to be never/light smokers compared with patients in the WT/WT cohort (P < .001). Eighteen of the 19 EML4-ALKtumors were adenocarcinomas, predominantly the signet ring cell subtype. Among patients with metastatic disease, EML4-ALK positivity was associated with resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Patients in the EML4-ALK cohort and the WT/WT cohort showed similar response rates to platinum-based combination chemotherapy and no difference in overall survival. CONCLUSION:EML4-ALK defines a molecular subset of NSCLC with distinct clinical characteristics. Patients who harbor this mutation do not benefit from EGFR TKIs and should be directed to trials of ALK-targeted agents.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Ming-Sound Tsao; Akira Sakurada; Jean-Claude Cutz; Chang-Qi Zhu; Suzanne Kamel-Reid; Jeremy Squire; Ian Lorimer; Tong Zhang; Ni Liu; Manijeh Daneshmand; Paula Marrano; Gilda da Cunha Santos; Alain Lagarde; Frank Richardson; Lesley Seymour; Marlo Whitehead; Keyue Ding; Joseph Pater; Frances A Shepherd Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-07-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Joan H Schiller; David Harrington; Chandra P Belani; Corey Langer; Alan Sandler; James Krook; Junming Zhu; David H Johnson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-01-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Hisayuki Shigematsu; Li Lin; Takao Takahashi; Masaharu Nomura; Makoto Suzuki; Ignacio I Wistuba; Kwun M Fong; Huei Lee; Shinichi Toyooka; Nobuyoshi Shimizu; Takehiko Fujisawa; Ziding Feng; Jack A Roth; Joachim Herz; John D Minna; Adi F Gazdar Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2005-03-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: J Guillermo Paez; Pasi A Jänne; Jeffrey C Lee; Sean Tracy; Heidi Greulich; Stacey Gabriel; Paula Herman; Frederic J Kaye; Neal Lindeman; Titus J Boggon; Katsuhiko Naoki; Hidefumi Sasaki; Yoshitaka Fujii; Michael J Eck; William R Sellers; Bruce E Johnson; Matthew Meyerson Journal: Science Date: 2004-04-29 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Thomas J Lynch; Daphne W Bell; Raffaella Sordella; Sarada Gurubhagavatula; Ross A Okimoto; Brian W Brannigan; Patricia L Harris; Sara M Haserlat; Jeffrey G Supko; Frank G Haluska; David N Louis; David C Christiani; Jeff Settleman; Daniel A Haber Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-04-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: William Pao; Theresa Y Wang; Gregory J Riely; Vincent A Miller; Qiulu Pan; Marc Ladanyi; Maureen F Zakowski; Robert T Heelan; Mark G Kris; Harold E Varmus Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2005-01-25 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Kenji Shibuya; Colin D Mathers; Cynthia Boschi-Pinto; Alan D Lopez; Christopher J L Murray Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2002-12-26 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Anthony C Faber; Ryan B Corcoran; Hiromichi Ebi; Lecia V Sequist; Belinda A Waltman; Euiheon Chung; Joao Incio; Subba R Digumarthy; Sarah F Pollack; Youngchul Song; Alona Muzikansky; Eugene Lifshits; Sylvie Roberge; Erik J Coffman; Cyril H Benes; Henry L Gómez; José Baselga; Carlos L Arteaga; Miguel N Rivera; Dora Dias-Santagata; Rakesh K Jain; Jeffrey A Engelman Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2011-07-22 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: L V Sequist; R S Heist; A T Shaw; P Fidias; R Rosovsky; J S Temel; I T Lennes; S Digumarthy; B A Waltman; E Bast; S Tammireddy; L Morrissey; A Muzikansky; S B Goldberg; J Gainor; C L Channick; J C Wain; H Gaissert; D M Donahue; A Muniappan; C Wright; H Willers; D J Mathisen; N C Choi; J Baselga; T J Lynch; L W Ellisen; M Mino-Kenudson; M Lanuti; D R Borger; A J Iafrate; J A Engelman; D Dias-Santagata Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2011-11-09 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Alice T Shaw; Beow Y Yeap; Benjamin J Solomon; Gregory J Riely; Justin Gainor; Jeffrey A Engelman; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Daniel B Costa; Sai-Hong I Ou; Mohit Butaney; Ravi Salgia; Robert G Maki; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Robert C Doebele; Yung-Jue Bang; Kimary Kulig; Paulina Selaru; Yiyun Tang; Keith D Wilner; Eunice L Kwak; Jeffrey W Clark; A John Iafrate; D Ross Camidge Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2011-09-18 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Jamie E Chaft; Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack; Fernando C Santini; Juliana Eng; Beow Y Yeap; Benjamin Izar; Emily Chin; David R Jones; Mark G Kris; Alice T Shaw; Justin F Gainor Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2018-05-22 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Zhao Chen; Esra Akbay; Oliver Mikse; Tanya Tupper; Katherine Cheng; Yuchuan Wang; Xiaohong Tan; Abigail Altabef; Sue-Ann Woo; Liang Chen; Jacob B Reibel; Pasi A Janne; Norman E Sharpless; Jeffrey A Engelman; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Andrew L Kung; Kwok-Kin Wong Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-12-10 Impact factor: 12.531