PURPOSE: The EML4-ALK fusion gene has been detected in approximately 7% of Japanese non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). We determined the frequency of EML4-ALK in Caucasian NSCLC and in NSCLC cell lines. We also determined whether TAE684, a specific ALK kinase inhibitor, would inhibit the growth of EML4-ALK-containing cell lines in vitro and in vivo. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We screened 305 primary NSCLC [both U.S. (n = 138) and Korean (n = 167) patients] and 83 NSCLC cell lines using reverse transcription-PCR and by exon array analyses. We evaluated the efficacy of TAE684 against NSCLC cell lines in vitro and in vivo. RESULTS: We detected four different variants, including two novel variants, of EML4-ALK using reverse transcription-PCR in 8 of 305 tumors (3%) and 3 of 83 (3.6%) NSCLC cell lines. All EML4-ALK-containing tumors and cell lines were adenocarcinomas. EML4-ALK was detected more frequently in NSCLC patients who were never or light (<10 pack-years) cigarette smokers compared with current/former smokers (6% versus 1%; P = 0.049). TAE684 inhibited the growth of one of three (H3122) EML4-ALK-containing cell lines in vitro and in vivo, inhibited Akt phosphorylation, and caused apoptosis. In another EML4-ALK cell line, DFCI032, TAE684 was ineffective due to coactivation of epidermal growth factor receptor and ERBB2. The combination of TAE684 and CL-387,785 (epidermal growth factor receptor/ERBB2 kinase inhibitor) inhibited growth and Akt phosphorylation and led to apoptosis in the DFCI032 cell line. CONCLUSIONS: EML4-ALK is found in the minority of NSCLC. ALK kinase inhibitors alone or in combination may nevertheless be clinically effective treatments for NSCLC patients whose tumors contain EML4-ALK.
PURPOSE: The EML4-ALK fusion gene has been detected in approximately 7% of Japanese non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). We determined the frequency of EML4-ALK in Caucasian NSCLC and in NSCLC cell lines. We also determined whether TAE684, a specific ALK kinase inhibitor, would inhibit the growth of EML4-ALK-containing cell lines in vitro and in vivo. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We screened 305 primary NSCLC [both U.S. (n = 138) and Korean (n = 167) patients] and 83 NSCLC cell lines using reverse transcription-PCR and by exon array analyses. We evaluated the efficacy of TAE684 against NSCLC cell lines in vitro and in vivo. RESULTS: We detected four different variants, including two novel variants, of EML4-ALK using reverse transcription-PCR in 8 of 305 tumors (3%) and 3 of 83 (3.6%) NSCLC cell lines. All EML4-ALK-containing tumors and cell lines were adenocarcinomas. EML4-ALK was detected more frequently in NSCLCpatients who were never or light (<10 pack-years) cigarette smokers compared with current/former smokers (6% versus 1%; P = 0.049). TAE684 inhibited the growth of one of three (H3122) EML4-ALK-containing cell lines in vitro and in vivo, inhibited Akt phosphorylation, and caused apoptosis. In another EML4-ALK cell line, DFCI032, TAE684 was ineffective due to coactivation of epidermal growth factor receptor and ERBB2. The combination of TAE684 and CL-387,785 (epidermal growth factor receptor/ERBB2 kinase inhibitor) inhibited growth and Akt phosphorylation and led to apoptosis in the DFCI032 cell line. CONCLUSIONS:EML4-ALK is found in the minority of NSCLC. ALK kinase inhibitors alone or in combination may nevertheless be clinically effective treatments for NSCLCpatients whose tumors contain EML4-ALK.
Authors: Anna V Galkin; Jonathan S Melnick; Sungjoon Kim; Tami L Hood; Nanxin Li; Lintong Li; Gang Xia; Ruo Steensma; Greg Chopiuk; Jiqing Jiang; Yongqin Wan; Peter Ding; Yi Liu; Fangxian Sun; Peter G Schultz; Nathanael S Gray; Markus Warmuth Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-12-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Elizabeth Ward; Taylor Murray; Jiaquan Xu; Michael J Thun Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2007 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Jayne M Stommel; Alec C Kimmelman; Haoqiang Ying; Roustem Nabioullin; Aditya H Ponugoti; Ruprecht Wiedemeyer; Alexander H Stegh; James E Bradner; Keith L Ligon; Cameron Brennan; Lynda Chin; Ronald A DePinho Journal: Science Date: 2007-09-13 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Klarisa Rikova; Ailan Guo; Qingfu Zeng; Anthony Possemato; Jian Yu; Herbert Haack; Julie Nardone; Kimberly Lee; Cynthia Reeves; Yu Li; Yerong Hu; Zhiping Tan; Matthew Stokes; Laura Sullivan; Jeffrey Mitchell; Randy Wetzel; Joan Macneill; Jian Min Ren; Jin Yuan; Corey E Bakalarski; Judit Villen; Jon M Kornhauser; Bradley Smith; Daiqiang Li; Xinmin Zhou; Steven P Gygi; Ting-Lei Gu; Roberto D Polakiewicz; John Rush; Michael J Comb Journal: Cell Date: 2007-12-14 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: James G Christensen; Helen Y Zou; Maria E Arango; Qiuhua Li; Joseph H Lee; Scott R McDonnell; Shinji Yamazaki; Gordon R Alton; Barbara Mroczkowski; Gerrit Los Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Jeffrey A Engelman; Kreshnik Zejnullahu; Christopher-Michael Gale; Eugene Lifshits; Andrea J Gonzales; Takeshi Shimamura; Feng Zhao; Patrick W Vincent; George N Naumov; James E Bradner; Irene W Althaus; Leena Gandhi; Geoffrey I Shapiro; James M Nelson; John V Heymach; Matthew Meyerson; Kwok-Kin Wong; Pasi A Jänne Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2007-12-15 Impact factor: 13.312
Authors: Hong Lou; Hongchuan Li; Meredith Yeager; Kate Im; Bert Gold; Thomas D Schneider; Joseph F Fraumeni; Stephen J Chanock; Stephen K Anderson; Michael Dean Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2012-06-04 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Xiao-Song Wang; Sunita Shankar; Saravana M Dhanasekaran; Bushra Ateeq; Atsuo T Sasaki; Xiaojun Jing; Daniel Robinson; Qi Cao; John R Prensner; Anastasia K Yocum; Rui Wang; Daniel F Fries; Bo Han; Irfan A Asangani; Xuhong Cao; Yong Li; Gilbert S Omenn; Dorothee Pflueger; Anuradha Gopalan; Victor E Reuter; Emily Rose Kahoud; Lewis C Cantley; Mark A Rubin; Nallasivam Palanisamy; Sooryanarayana Varambally; Arul M Chinnaiyan Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2011-06-01 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Alice T Shaw; Beow Y Yeap; Benjamin J Solomon; Gregory J Riely; Justin Gainor; Jeffrey A Engelman; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Daniel B Costa; Sai-Hong I Ou; Mohit Butaney; Ravi Salgia; Robert G Maki; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Robert C Doebele; Yung-Jue Bang; Kimary Kulig; Paulina Selaru; Yiyun Tang; Keith D Wilner; Eunice L Kwak; Jeffrey W Clark; A John Iafrate; D Ross Camidge Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2011-09-18 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Johannes M Heuckmann; Michael Hölzel; Martin L Sos; Stefanie Heynck; Hyatt Balke-Want; Mirjam Koker; Martin Peifer; Jonathan Weiss; Christine M Lovly; Christian Grütter; Daniel Rauh; William Pao; Roman K Thomas Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-09-26 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Lauren Averett Byers; Lixia Diao; Jing Wang; Pierre Saintigny; Luc Girard; Michael Peyton; Li Shen; Youhong Fan; Uma Giri; Praveen K Tumula; Monique B Nilsson; Jayanthi Gudikote; Hai Tran; Robert J G Cardnell; David J Bearss; Steven L Warner; Jason M Foulks; Steven B Kanner; Varsha Gandhi; Nancy Krett; Steven T Rosen; Edward S Kim; Roy S Herbst; George R Blumenschein; J Jack Lee; Scott M Lippman; K Kian Ang; Gordon B Mills; Waun K Hong; John N Weinstein; Ignacio I Wistuba; Kevin R Coombes; John D Minna; John V Heymach Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-10-22 Impact factor: 12.531