BACKGROUND: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), using break-apart red (3') and green (5') ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase) probes, consistently shows rearrangements in <100% of tumor cells in ALK-positive (ALK+) nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Increased copy numbers of fused and rearranged signals also occur. Here, correlations are explored between the percentage of ALK+ cells and signal copy number and their association with response to ALK inhibition. METHODS: Ninety ALK+ NSCLC cases were evaluated. The percentage of positive cells, pattern of positivity (split, single red, or both), and copy number of fused, isolated red and green signals were recorded. Thirty patients had received crizotinib. RESULTS: Increased isolated red signal copy number (contributing to both single red and split patterns of positivity) correlated with a higher percentage of ALK+ cells (r = 0.743, P < .0001). Mean fused copy number was negatively associated with isolated red signal copy number (r = -0.409, P < .0001). Neither percentage of positive cells (r = 0.192, P = .3), nor copy number of isolated red signal (r = 0.274, P = .195) correlated with maximal tumor shrinkage with crizotinib. CONCLUSIONS: The strong association between increased copy number of key ALK signals and percentage of positive cells suggests that the <100% rate of cellular positivity in ALK+ tumors is due to technical factors, not biological factors. In ALK+ tumors, neither the percentage of positive cells nor signal copy number appear to be informative variables for predicting benefit from ALK inhibition. The inverse relationship between fused and isolated red copy number suggests ALK+ may be a distinct "near-diploid" subtype of NSCLC that develops before significant chromosomal aneusomy occurs.
BACKGROUND: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), using break-apart red (3') and green (5') ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase) probes, consistently shows rearrangements in <100% of tumor cells in ALK-positive (ALK+) nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Increased copy numbers of fused and rearranged signals also occur. Here, correlations are explored between the percentage of ALK+ cells and signal copy number and their association with response to ALK inhibition. METHODS: Ninety ALK+ NSCLC cases were evaluated. The percentage of positive cells, pattern of positivity (split, single red, or both), and copy number of fused, isolated red and green signals were recorded. Thirty patients had received crizotinib. RESULTS: Increased isolated red signal copy number (contributing to both single red and split patterns of positivity) correlated with a higher percentage of ALK+ cells (r = 0.743, P < .0001). Mean fused copy number was negatively associated with isolated red signal copy number (r = -0.409, P < .0001). Neither percentage of positive cells (r = 0.192, P = .3), nor copy number of isolated red signal (r = 0.274, P = .195) correlated with maximal tumor shrinkage with crizotinib. CONCLUSIONS: The strong association between increased copy number of key ALK signals and percentage of positive cells suggests that the <100% rate of cellular positivity in ALK+ tumors is due to technical factors, not biological factors. In ALK+ tumors, neither the percentage of positive cells nor signal copy number appear to be informative variables for predicting benefit from ALK inhibition. The inverse relationship between fused and isolated red copy number suggests ALK+ may be a distinct "near-diploid" subtype of NSCLC that develops before significant chromosomal aneusomy occurs.
Authors: Eunice L Kwak; Yung-Jue Bang; D Ross Camidge; Alice T Shaw; Benjamin Solomon; Robert G Maki; Sai-Hong I Ou; Bruce J Dezube; Pasi A Jänne; Daniel B Costa; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Woo-Ho Kim; Thomas J Lynch; Panos Fidias; Hannah Stubbs; Jeffrey A Engelman; Lecia V Sequist; WeiWei Tan; Leena Gandhi; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Greg C Wei; S Martin Shreeve; Mark J Ratain; Jeffrey Settleman; James G Christensen; Daniel A Haber; Keith Wilner; Ravi Salgia; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Jeffrey W Clark; A John Iafrate Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-10-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: D Ross Camidge; Scott A Kono; Antonella Flacco; Aik-Choon Tan; Robert C Doebele; Qing Zhou; Lucio Crino; Wilbur A Franklin; Marileila Varella-Garcia Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-11-09 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Maria Paola Martelli; Gabriella Sozzi; Luis Hernandez; Valentina Pettirossi; Alba Navarro; Davide Conte; Patrizia Gasparini; Federica Perrone; Piergiorgio Modena; Ugo Pastorino; Antonino Carbone; Alessandra Fabbri; Angelo Sidoni; Shigeo Nakamura; Marcello Gambacorta; Pedro Luis Fernández; Jose Ramirez; John K C Chan; Walter Franco Grigioni; Elias Campo; Stefano A Pileri; Brunangelo Falini Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2009-01-15 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Klarisa Rikova; Ailan Guo; Qingfu Zeng; Anthony Possemato; Jian Yu; Herbert Haack; Julie Nardone; Kimberly Lee; Cynthia Reeves; Yu Li; Yerong Hu; Zhiping Tan; Matthew Stokes; Laura Sullivan; Jeffrey Mitchell; Randy Wetzel; Joan Macneill; Jian Min Ren; Jin Yuan; Corey E Bakalarski; Judit Villen; Jon M Kornhauser; Bradley Smith; Daiqiang Li; Xinmin Zhou; Steven P Gygi; Ting-Lei Gu; Roberto D Polakiewicz; John Rush; Michael J Comb Journal: Cell Date: 2007-12-14 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: D Ross Camidge; Margaret Skokan; Porntip Kiatsimkul; Barbara Helfrich; Xian Lu; Anna E Barón; Nathan Schulte; DeLee Maxson; Dara L Aisner; Wilbur A Franklin; Robert C Doebele; Marileila Varella-Garcia Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-09-10 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Olatunji B Alese; Bassel F El-Rayes; Gabriel Sica; Guojing Zhang; Dianne Alexis; Francisco G La Rosa; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Zhengjia Chen; Michael R Rossi; Nazim V Adsay; Fadlo R Khuri; Taofeek K Owonikoko Journal: Ther Adv Med Oncol Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 8.168
Authors: Andrew J Weickhardt; Dara L Aisner; Wilbur A Franklin; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Robert C Doebele; D Ross Camidge Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-12-20 Impact factor: 6.860