Literature DB >> 24402641

Evaluation of a computer program for non-invasive determination of pulmonary shunt and ventilation-perfusion mismatch.

Geoffrey G Lockwood1, Nick L S Fung, J Gareth Jones.   

Abstract

We describe a three-compartment model (shunt and two perfused compartments) to analyse the relationship between inspired oxygen (FIO2) and arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) in terms of pulmonary shunt and ventilation-perfusion ratio (VA/Q). The program was tested using 24 exact datasets, each with six pairs of FIO2 and SaO2 data points with known VA/Q and shunt, generated by a complex calculator of gas exchange. Additional datasets were created by adding noise and rounding the exact sets, and by reducing the number of data points per dataset. The importance of the oxyhaemoglobin dissociation curve and the arterio-venous difference in oxygen content (avDO2) were also tested. Analysis using the three compartment model was more accurate than the two compartment model and less affected by data degradation. The absolute error in shunt estimation was never more than 2.2 % for the exact and rounded datasets, but the error in VA/Q estimation was -29 to 19 % of the true value (10th-90th centiles). The characteristics of the well-ventilated compartment were not determined accurately. At extremes of cardiac output, an assumed value of avDO2 resulted in significant errors. It is probably advantageous to correct for foetal haemoglobin in neonatal datasets. Analysis of FIO2 versus SaO2 datasets using a three compartment model provides accurate estimates of shunt and VA/Q when arterio-venous difference in oxygen content is known. The estimates may have value as objective measures of gas exchange, and as a visual guide for oxygen therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24402641     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-014-9554-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  24 in total

1.  Clinical refinement of the automatic lung parameter estimator (ALPE).

Authors:  Lars P Thomsen; Dan S Karbing; Bram W Smith; David Murley; Ulla M Weinreich; Søren Kjærgaard; Egon Toft; Per Thorgaard; Steen Andreassen; Stephen E Rees
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Central venous and mixed venous oxygen saturation in critically ill patients.

Authors:  C Ladakis; P Myrianthefs; A Karabinis; G Karatzas; T Dosios; G Fildissis; J Gogas; G Baltopoulos
Journal:  Respiration       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.580

3.  Accuracy of pulse oximetry in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  A Van de Louw; C Cracco; C Cerf; A Harf; P Duvaldestin; F Lemaire; L Brochard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Importance of the sampling site for measurement of mixed venous oxygen saturation in shock.

Authors:  J D Edwards; R M Mayall
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Alveolar ventilation to perfusion heterogeneity and diffusion impairment in a mathematical model of gas exchange.

Authors:  M F Vidal Melo; J A Loeppky; A Caprihan; U C Luft
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1993-04

6.  Can central venous blood replace mixed venous blood samples?

Authors:  J Tahvanainen; O Meretoja; P Nikki
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  The PIO2 vs. SpO2 diagram: a non-invasive measure of pulmonary oxygen exchange.

Authors:  D J Sapsford; J G Jones
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Noninvasive determination of effective (nonshunted) pulmonary blood flow in normal and injured lungs.

Authors:  C M Steinhart; K D Burch; D S Brudno; D H Parker
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Oxygen derived variables in acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  H D Covelli; V J Nessan; W K Tuttle
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Non-invasive estimation of venous admixture: validation of a new formula.

Authors:  D A Hope; B J Jenkins; N Willis; H Maddock; W W Mapleson
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 9.166

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Journal of clinical monitoring and computing 2014 end of year summary: respiration.

Authors:  D S Karbing; S E Rees; M B Jaffe
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Intrapulmonary shunting is a key contributor to hypoxia in COVID-19: An update on the pathophysiology.

Authors:  Nikhil Mayor; Harry Knights; Aleksandra Kotwica; Andrew Solomon Joseph Coppola; Harriet Hunter; Nathan Jeffreys; Alexander Morgan; Shivani Gupta; James Prentice; Rebecca Macfarlane; Emma Russell-Jones; Theodore Dassios; David Russell-Jones
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Pulmonary gas exchange evaluated by machine learning: a computer simulation.

Authors:  Thomas J Morgan; Adrian N Langley; Robin D C Barrett; Christopher M Anstey
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 1.977

4.  Design of liver functional reserve monitor based on three-wavelength from red light to IR.

Authors:  Fuli Ye; Huimiao Zhan; Guilian Shi
Journal:  Technol Health Care       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.285

5.  Ventilation/perfusion ratio and right to left shunt in healthy newborn infants.

Authors:  Theodore Dassios; Kamal Ali; Thomas Rossor; Anne Greenough
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Intrapulmonary shunt measured by bedside pulse oximetry predicts worse outcomes in severe COVID-19.

Authors:  Aleksandra Kotwica; Harry Knights; Nikhil Mayor; Emma Russell-Jones; Theodore Dassios; David Russell-Jones
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 16.671

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.