Literature DB >> 16269105

Delay-period activity in the prefrontal cortex: one function is sensory gating.

Bradley R Postle1.   

Abstract

The prefrontal cortex (PFC) contributes to working memory functions via executive control processes that do not entail the storage, per se, of mnemonic representations. One of these control processes may be a sensory gating mechanism that facilitates retention of representations in working memory by down-regulating the gain of the sensory processing of intervening irrelevant stimuli. This idea was tested by scanning healthy young adults with functional magnetic resonance imaging while they performed a delayed face-recognition task. The 2 x 2 factorial design varied the factors of Memory (present, absent) and Distraction (present, absent). During memory-present trials, target and probe stimuli were individual gray-scale male faces. Memory-absent trials were identical, except that they employed the same recurring female faces (denoting a "no memory" trial). Distraction-present trials featured rapid serial visual presentation of bespectacled male faces during the two middle seconds of the delay. The first step of the analyses identified dorsolateral PFC (dlPFC) and inferior occipitotemporal cortex (IOTC) voxels exhibiting delay-period activity in memory-present/distraction-absent trials, that is, the "unfilled" delay. Within these voxels, distraction-evoked activity in the dlPFC was markedly higher during trials that required the concurrent short-term retention of information than on those that did not, whereas the opposite effect was seen in the IOTC. These results are consistent with the view that processes related to sensory gating account for a portion of the delay-period activity that is routinely observed in the dlPFC.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16269105      PMCID: PMC1343532          DOI: 10.1162/089892905774589208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  60 in total

1.  Age differences in behavior and PET activation reveal differences in interference resolution in verbal working memory.

Authors:  J Jonides; C Marshuetz; E E Smith; P A Reuter-Lorenz; R A Koeppe; A Hartley
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The role of prefrontal cortex in sensory memory and motor preparation: an event-related fMRI study.

Authors:  M D'Esposito; D Ballard; E Zarahn; G K Aguirre
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of episodic coding, proactive interference, and list length effects in a running span verbal working memory task.

Authors:  B R Postle; J S Berger; J H Goldstein; C E Curtis; M D'Esposito
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Prefrontal neuronal activity encodes spatial target representations sequentially updated after nonspatial target-shift cues.

Authors:  Tetsuya Fukushima; Isao Hasegawa; Yasushi Miyashita
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10-29       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation.

Authors:  K K Kwong; J W Belliveau; D A Chesler; I E Goldberg; R M Weisskoff; B P Poncelet; D N Kennedy; B E Hoppel; M S Cohen; R Turner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The variability of human, BOLD hemodynamic responses.

Authors:  G K Aguirre; E Zarahn; M D'esposito
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited.

Authors:  K J Friston; A P Holmes; J B Poline; P J Grasby; S C Williams; R S Frackowiak; R Turner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  The role of working memory in visual selective attention.

Authors:  J W de Fockert; G Rees; C D Frith; N Lavie
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-02       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Effects of frontal lobe damage on interference effects in working memory.

Authors:  Sharon L Thompson-Schill; John Jonides; Christy Marshuetz; Edward E Smith; Mark D'Esposito; Irene P Kan; Robert T Knight; Diane Swick
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Dissociable roles of mid-dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior inferotemporal cortex in visual working memory.

Authors:  M Petrides
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  32 in total

1.  Neural Representation of Working Memory Content Is Modulated by Visual Attentional Demand.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Emma Wu Dowd; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Causal evidence for frontal involvement in memory target maintenance by posterior brain areas during distracter interference of visual working memory.

Authors:  Eva Feredoes; Klaartje Heinen; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Christian Ruff; Jon Driver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain.

Authors:  B R Postle
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 4.  From cognitive to neural models of working memory.

Authors:  Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Dynamic adjustments in prefrontal, hippocampal, and inferior temporal interactions with increasing visual working memory load.

Authors:  Jesse Rissman; Adam Gazzaley; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Interactions between working memory and visual perception: an ERP/EEG study.

Authors:  Yigal Agam; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Opening the gate to working memory.

Authors:  David Badre
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Novelty detection is enhanced when attention is otherwise engaged: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  J Schomaker; M Meeter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Evaluating frontal and parietal contributions to spatial working memory with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Massihullah Hamidi; Giulio Tononi; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  A no-go related prefrontal negativity larger to irrelevant stimuli that are difficult to suppress.

Authors:  Alice M Proverbio; Marzia Del Zotto; Nicola Crotti; Alberto Zani
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 3.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.