Literature DB >> 18294773

Object switching within working memory is reflected in the human event-related brain potential.

Stefan Berti1.   

Abstract

In two experiments applying a memory updating task subjects are asked to perform several arithmetic operations on stored numbers. From a trial-to-trial perspective these operations could be either performed on a previously processed item or on a new item which requires an object switch in working memory. Object switching results in prolonged operation times; these operation time costs reflect the switch of the focus of attention to the relevant information. Event-related brain potentials obtained in object switch trials show an increased P3a around 300 ms and a late, central negative component between 400 ms and 500 ms. The data suggest that the P3a may reflect the unhitching of the focus of attention from the current information or task set through the inhibition of the prepared response while the late negative component may reflect the allocation of the focus of attention to another object in working memory. The present results are best explained within a controlled attention view of working memory supporting the idea that object switching relies on the ability to orient the focus of attention within working memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18294773     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.01.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  7 in total

Review 1.  The cognitive determinants of behavioral distraction by deviant auditory stimuli: a review.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-21

2.  Novelty detection is enhanced when attention is otherwise engaged: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  J Schomaker; M Meeter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Preventing distraction: assessing stimulus-specific and general effects of the predictive cueing of deviant auditory events.

Authors:  János Horváth; Elyse Sussman; István Winkler; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 3.251

4.  Set-specific capture can be reduced by preemptively occupying a limited-capacity focus of attention.

Authors:  Katherine Sledge Moore; Daniel H Weissman
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2011-01-01

5.  The role of auditory transient and deviance processing in distraction of task performance: a combined behavioral and event-related brain potential study.

Authors:  Stefan Berti
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  A bottleneck model of set-specific capture.

Authors:  Katherine Sledge Moore; Daniel H Weissman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Switching Attention Within Working Memory is Reflected in the P3a Component of the Human Event-Related Brain Potential.

Authors:  Stefan Berti
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.