Literature DB >> 20880260

Surprise? Early visual novelty processing is not modulated by attention.

Elise C Tarbi1, Xue Sun, Phillip J Holcomb, Kirk R Daffner.   

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of direction of attention on the early detection of visual novelty, as indexed by the anterior N2. The anterior N2 was measured in young subjects (n=32) under an attend and an ignore condition. Subjects were presented standard, target/rare, and perceptually novel visual stimuli under both conditions, but under the ignore condition, attention was directed toward an auditory n-back task. The size of the anterior N2 to novel stimuli did not differ between conditions and was significantly larger than the anterior N2 to all other stimulus types. Furthermore, under the ignore condition, the anterior N2 to visual novel stimuli was not affected by the level of difficulty of the auditory n-back task (3-back vs. 2-back). Our findings suggest that the early processing of visual novelty, as measured by the size of the anterior N2, is not strongly modulated by direction of attention.
Copyright © 2010 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20880260      PMCID: PMC3017671          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01129.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  32 in total

1.  An electrophysiological index of stimulus unfamiliarity.

Authors:  K R Daffner; M M Mesulam; L F Scinto; V Calvo; R Faust; P J Holcomb
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 2.  On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity.

Authors:  A Kok
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Think differently: a brain orienting response to task novelty.

Authors:  Francisco Barceló; José A Periáñez; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-10-28       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Increased responsiveness to novelty is associated with successful cognitive aging.

Authors:  Kirk R Daffner; Katherine K Ryan; Danielle M Williams; Andrew E Budson; Dorene M Rentz; David A Wolk; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Novelty and conflict in the categorization of complex stimuli.

Authors:  Jonathan R Folstein; Cyma Van Petten; Scott A Rose
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  To ignore or explore: top-down modulation of novelty processing.

Authors:  Hyemi Chong; Jenna L Riis; Scott M McGinnis; Danielle M Williams; Phillip J Holcomb; Kirk R Daffner
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 7.  Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review.

Authors:  Jonathan R Folstein; Cyma Van Petten
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Task switching and novelty processing activate a common neural network for cognitive control.

Authors:  Francisco Barcelo; Carles Escera; Maria J Corral; Jose A Periáñez
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Detecting novelty and significance.

Authors:  Vera Ferrari; Margaret M Bradley; Maurizio Codispoti; Peter J Lang
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Age-related changes in early novelty processing as measured by ERPs.

Authors:  Jenna L Riis; Hyemi Chong; Scott McGinnnis; Elise Tarbi; Xue Sun; Phillip J Holcomb; Dorene M Rentz; Kirk R Daffner
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 3.251

View more
  10 in total

1.  Novelty detection is enhanced when attention is otherwise engaged: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  J Schomaker; M Meeter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Age-related differences in early novelty processing: using PCA to parse the overlapping anterior P2 and N2 components.

Authors:  Kirk R Daffner; Brittany R Alperin; Katherine K Mott; Erich S Tusch; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 3.251

3.  Does compensatory neural activity survive old-old age?

Authors:  Kirk R Daffner; Xue Sun; Elise C Tarbi; Dorene M Rentz; Phillip J Holcomb; Jenna L Riis
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  C145 as a short-latency electrophysiological index of cognitive compensation in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Robert M Chapman; Anton P Porsteinsson; Margaret N Gardner; Mark Mapstone; John W McCrary; Tiffany C Sandoval; Maria D Guillily; Elizabeth DeGrush; Lindsey A Reilly
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.472

5.  Response of the Pre-Oriented Goal-Directed Attention to Usual and Unusual Distractors: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Golnaz Baghdadi; Farzad Towhidkhah; Reza Rostami; Mohsen Raza
Journal:  Basic Clin Neurosci       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr

6.  Neurocognitive development of novelty and error monitoring in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Kathleen Kang; Nina Alexander; Jan R Wessel; Pauline Wimberger; Katharina Nitzsche; Clemens Kirschbaum; Shu-Chen Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The detection of novelty relies on dopaminergic signaling: evidence from apomorphine's impact on the novelty N2.

Authors:  Mauricio Rangel-Gomez; Clayton Hickey; Therese van Amelsvoort; Pierre Bet; Martijn Meeter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Electrophysiological analysis of the role of novelty in the von Restorff effect.

Authors:  Mauricio Rangel-Gomez; Martijn Meeter
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 2.708

9.  Novelty Manipulations, Memory Performance, and Predictive Coding: the Role of Unexpectedness.

Authors:  Richárd Reichardt; Bertalan Polner; Péter Simor
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Perceptual stimuli with novel bindings interfere with visual working memory.

Authors:  Peter Shepherdson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 2.199

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.