Literature DB >> 20436207

Haptic perception of gravitational and inertial mass.

Wouter M Bergmann Tiest1, Astrid M L Kappers.   

Abstract

Mass can be perceived in different ways: statically, through gravitational cues; dynamically, through inertial cues; or a combination of both. This article investigates the relationship between these modes of perception. In three different experiments, subjects matched masses that were held statically in the hand to masses that were either accelerated or decelerated. Accelerated masses were perceived to be smaller than masses of equal physical magnitude held statically by a factor of 2. However, decelerated masses were matched veridically to masses held statically. This difference remained present when contact duration was made very short. This shows that the shift in perceived mass is not the result of differences in the information available, but of differences in the mode of perception (active acceleration vs. passive deceleration). It is hypothesized that this is due to a suppression of the perception of applied force in active touch.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20436207     DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.4.1144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  6 in total

1.  Perception-action dissociation generalizes to the size-inertia illusion.

Authors:  Jonathan Platkiewicz; Vincent Hayward
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Moving the weber fraction: the perceptual precision for moment of inertia increases with exploration force.

Authors:  Nienke B Debats; Idsart Kingma; Peter J Beek; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Effects of varying gravity levels in parabolic flight on the size-mass illusion.

Authors:  Gilles Clément
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Touch as an auxiliary proprioceptive cue for movement control.

Authors:  A Moscatelli; M Bianchi; S Ciotti; G C Bettelani; C V Parise; F Lacquaniti; A Bicchi
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 14.136

5.  Mass is all that matters in the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Myrthe A Plaisier; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Delays in Admittance-Controlled Haptic Devices Make Simulated Masses Feel Heavier.

Authors:  Irene A Kuling; Jeroen B J Smeets; Piet Lammertse; Bram Onneweer; Winfred Mugge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.