Literature DB >> 33528597

Seeing motion of controlled object improves grip timing in adults with autism spectrum condition: evidence for use of inverse dynamics in motor control.

Shinya Takamuku1, Haruhisa Ohta2, Chieko Kanai2,3, Antonia F de C Hamilton4, Hiroaki Gomi5.   

Abstract

Previous studies (Haswell et al. in Nat Neurosci 12:970-972, 2009; Marko et al. in Brain J Neurol 138:784-797, 2015) reported that people with autism rely less on vision for learning to reach in a force field. This suggested a possibility that they have difficulties in extracting force information from visual motion signals, a process called inverse dynamics computation. Our recent study (Takamuku et al. in J Int Soc Autism Res 11:1062-1075, 2018) examined the ability of inverse computation with two perceptual tasks and found similar performances in typical and autistic adults. However, this tested the computation only in the context of sensory perception while it was possible that the suspected disability is specific to the motor domain. Here, in order to address the concern, we tested the use of inverse dynamics computation in the context of motor control by measuring changes in grip timing caused by seeing/not seeing a controlled object. The motion of the object was informative of its inertial force and typical participants improved their grip timing based on the visual feedback. Our interest was on whether the autism participants show the same improvement. While some autism participants showed atypical hand slowing when seeing the controlled object, we found no evidence of abnormalities in the inverse computation in our grip timing task or in a replication of the perceptual task. This suggests that the ability of inverse dynamics computation is preserved not only for sensory perception but also for motor control in adults with autism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autism; Grip force control; Internal models; Inverse dynamics; Visuomotor control

Year:  2021        PMID: 33528597     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-021-06046-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  50 in total

1.  Independence of perceptual and sensorimotor predictions in the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  J R Flanagan; M A Beltzner
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Attention-based motion perception.

Authors:  P Cavanagh
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-09-11       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Motor force field learning influences visual processing of target motion.

Authors:  Liana E Brown; Elizabeth T Wilson; Melvyn A Goodale; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  A substantial and unexpected enhancement of motion perception in autism.

Authors:  Jennifer H Foss-Feig; Duje Tadin; Kimberly B Schauder; Carissa J Cascio
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The organization of the human cerebellum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity.

Authors:  Randy L Buckner; Fenna M Krienen; Angela Castellanos; Julio C Diaz; B T Thomas Yeo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Active sensing without efference copy: referent control of perception.

Authors:  Anatol G Feldman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Tactile sensitivity in Asperger syndrome.

Authors:  Sarah-Jayne Blakemore; Teresa Tavassoli; Susana Calò; Richard M Thomas; Caroline Catmur; Uta Frith; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2006-02-24       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Current perspectives on motor functioning in infants, children, and adults with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Anjana N Bhat; Rebecca J Landa; James Cole Galloway
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2011-05-05

Review 9.  Attention function and dysfunction in autism.

Authors:  G Allen; E Courchesne
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2001-02-01

10.  A pilot study: coordination of precision grip in children and adolescents with high functioning autism.

Authors:  Fabian J David; Grace T Baranek; Carol A Giuliani; Vicki S Mercer; Michele D Poe; Deborah E Thorpe
Journal:  Pediatr Phys Ther       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.049

View more
  2 in total

1.  An examination of active inference in autistic adults using immersive virtual reality.

Authors:  Tom Arthur; David Harris; Gavin Buckingham; Mark Brosnan; Mark Wilson; Genevieve Williams; Sam Vine
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Attribution of sensory prediction error to perception of muscle fatigue.

Authors:  Sho Ito; Toshitaka Kimura; Hiroaki Gomi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.996

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.