Literature DB >> 19699349

Interaction and prognostic effects of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and patient-prosthesis mismatch as determinants of outcome after isolated aortic valve replacement.

Joseph Brown1, Pallav Shah, Tony Stanton, Thomas H Marwick.   

Abstract

There are variable reported effects of patient-prosthesis mismatch (P-PM) on outcome. It was hypothesized that the adverse effect attributed to P-PM is actually due to left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (DD) in patients with small hearts. The aim of this study was therefore to determine the association among P-PM, DD, and outcomes. Doppler echocardiography was performed in 156 patients after aortic valve replacement. In vivo effective orifice areas for each prosthesis type and size were obtained from published references values of normally functioning prostheses. P-PM was identified from the predicted indexed orifice area, obtained by dividing the effective orifice area by body surface area. DD was classed as normal, delayed relaxation (prolonged deceleration time for age), or increased left atrial pressure (increased E/E' ratio, left atrial enlargement, short deceleration time). Events (cardiac-related hospitalizations and all-cause mortality after aortic valve replacement) were determined over a median follow-up periods of 3.5 years (interquartile range 2.1 to 5.7). P-PM was found in 91 patients (58%). Of the patients with P-PM, no DD was present on postoperative echocardiography in 15 patients (16%), delayed relaxation in 35 (39%), and increased left atrial pressure in 41 (45%). There were 61 total events (18 deaths and 43 hospitalizations): 4 (7%) in the no-DD group, 26 (42%) in the delayed relaxation group, and 31 (51%) in the increased left atrial pressure group. DD (p = 0.034) but not age (p = 0.09), the left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.60), or the presence of mismatch (p = 0.20) was associated with events. In conclusion, P-PM was associated with 14% mortality and a 39% composite event rate over 2-year follow-up. Events were significantly associated with DD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19699349     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.04.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  3 in total

1.  Exercise stress echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis: impact of baseline diastolic dysfunction and functional capacity on mortality and aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Andrew N Rassi; Wael Aljaroudi; Sahar Naderi; M Chadi Alraies; Venu Menon; Leonardo Rodriguez; Richard Grimm; Brian Griffin; Wael A Jaber
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-12

Review 2.  Assessment of left ventricular function in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Alper Ozkan; Samir Kapadia; Murat Tuzcu; Thomas H Marwick
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Impact of Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis on Coexisting Mitral Stenosis.

Authors:  Kohei Hachiro; Takeshi Kinoshita; Tomoaki Suzuki; Tohru Asai
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 1.520

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.