Literature DB >> 2938847

Diastolic filling dynamics in patients with aortic stenosis.

T Murakami, O M Hess, J E Gage, J Grimm, H P Krayenbuehl.   

Abstract

Left ventricular filling dynamics were investigated in 24 patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Biplane cineangiography was performed with simultaneous micromanometry in these 24 patients and in six control subjects. Twelve of the patients with AS had moderate hypertrophy with a left ventricular muscle mass index of less than 180 g/m2 (ASI group) and 12 had severe hypertrophy with an index of 180 g/m2 or more (AS2 group). Filling dynamics were also evaluated postoperatively in eight patients in the AS1 and six patients in the AS2 group. Preoperatively, end-diastolic and end-systolic volume indexes were larger and ejection fraction was lower in the AS2 compared with the control or AS1 group. Percent volume increase during the first half of diastole (%V1) was smaller in the AS1 than in the AS2 group. Peak filling rate in the first half of diastole (PFR 1) was higher in the AS2 than in the control or in AS1 group, while peak filling rate in the second half of diastole (PFR2) was considerably greater in the AS1 group than in the other two groups. The time constant of left ventricular pressure decline, an index of the rate of relaxation, was prolonged in the AS2 group. In contrast, mitral valve opening pressure (MVOP) was significantly higher in this group than in the other two groups. The constant of left ventricular chamber stiffness was slightly but not significantly greater in both AS groups than in the control subjects. After surgery in patients in the AS1 group, preoperatively reduced %V1 had increased and preoperatively enhanced PFR2 had decreased. In patients in the AS2 group, excluding one with a persistent low ejection fraction after surgery, preoperatively enhanced PFR1 decreased in association with a decrease in MVOP. Thus, left ventricular filling dynamics vary in patients with AS depending on the degree of left ventricular hypertrophy and systolic function. In patients with AS and moderate hypertrophy %V1 is slightly reduced but is compensated for by a forceful atrial contraction. In those with severe hypertrophy and systolic dysfunction increased driving pressure allows %V1 to remain within normal limits, despite prolonged left ventricular relaxation and decreased elastic recoil. Both changes in left ventricular filling dynamics tend to normalize after surgery in association with a reduction in left ventricular hypertrophy and/or an improvement of systolic function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2938847     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.73.6.1162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  11 in total

1.  Numerical modeling of ventricular filling.

Authors:  J D Thomas; A E Weyman
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Exercise stress echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis: impact of baseline diastolic dysfunction and functional capacity on mortality and aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Andrew N Rassi; Wael Aljaroudi; Sahar Naderi; M Chadi Alraies; Venu Menon; Leonardo Rodriguez; Richard Grimm; Brian Griffin; Wael A Jaber
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-12

3.  Quantification of global diastolic function by kinematic modeling-based analysis of transmitral flow via the parametrized diastolic filling formalism.

Authors:  Sina Mossahebi; Simeng Zhu; Howard Chen; Leonid Shmuylovich; Erina Ghosh; Sándor J Kovács
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Stiffness and relaxation components of the exponential and logistic time constants may be used to derive a load-independent index of isovolumic pressure decay.

Authors:  Leonid Shmuylovich; Sándor J Kovács
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 4.733

5.  Changes in left ventricular filling after valve replacement for aortic stenosis.

Authors:  M C Herregods; B Denef; A Aubert; H de Geest
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1993-09

6.  Estimation of left-ventricular systolic performance and its determinants in man from pressures and dimensions of one beat: effects of aortic valve stenosis and replacement.

Authors:  D M Regen; H Nonogi; O M Hess
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Diastolic properties of the normal left ventricle during supine exercise.

Authors:  H Nonogi; O M Hess; M Ritter; H P Krayenbuehl
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1988-07

8.  Titin isoform expression in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Lynne Williams; Neil Howell; Domenico Pagano; Peter Andreka; Marton Vertesaljai; Tiffany Pecor; Michael Frenneaux; Henk Granzier
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 6.124

9.  The spectrum of left ventricular filling in severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  B R Denef; A E Aubert; H de Geest
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1991

10.  beta-Arrestin-biased agonism of the angiotensin receptor induced by mechanical stress.

Authors:  Kriti Rakesh; ByungSu Yoo; Il-Man Kim; Natasha Salazar; Ki-Seok Kim; Howard A Rockman
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 8.192

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.