Literature DB >> 22261198

Impact of progression of diastolic dysfunction on mortality in patients with normal ejection fraction.

Wael Aljaroudi1, M Chadi Alraies, Carmel Halley, Leonardo Rodriguez, Richard A Grimm, James D Thomas, Wael A Jaber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diastolic dysfunction is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction. There are limited data, however, on whether worsening of diastolic function is associated with worse prognosis. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We reviewed clinical records and echocardiograms of consecutive patients who had baseline echocardiograms between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2009, that showed left ventricular ejection fraction ≥55% and who subsequently had a follow-up echocardiogram within 6 to 24 months. Diastolic function was labeled as normal, mild, moderate, or severe dysfunction. All-cause mortality was determined by use of the Social Security Death Index. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression analysis with a proportional hazard model were performed to assess outcomes. A total of 1065 outpatients were identified (mean±SD age, 67.9±13.9 years; 58% male). Baseline diastolic dysfunction was present in 770 patients (72.3%), with mild being the most prevalent. On follow-up testing (mean±SD, 1.1±0.4 years), 783 patients (73%) had stable, 168 (16%) had worsening, and 114 (11%) had improved baseline diastolic function. Eighty-eight patients (8.3%) had a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction to <55% and were more likely to have advanced diastolic dysfunction (P=0.002). After a mean±SD follow-up (from the second study) of 1.6±0.8 years, 142 patients (13%) died. On multivariate analysis, a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction to <55% and any worsening of diastolic function were independently associated with increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.85; P=0.02; and hazard ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-2.59; P=0.003, respectively).
CONCLUSION: In patients with normal baseline left ventricular ejection fraction, worsening of diastolic function is an independent predictor of mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22261198     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.066423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  55 in total

1.  Incremental prognostic value of diastolic dysfunction in low risk patients undergoing echocardiography: beyond Framingham score.

Authors:  Wael A AlJaroudi; M Chadi Alraies; Carmel Halley; Venu Menon; L Leonardo Rodriguez; Richard A Grimm; James D Thomas; Wael A Jaber
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Classification of diastolic function with phase-contrast cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: validation with echocardiography and age-related reference values.

Authors:  Sebastian J Buss; Birgit Krautz; Bernhardt Schnackenburg; Hassan Abdel-Aty; Maria Fernanda Braggion Santos; Florian Andre; Malte J Maertens; Derliz Mereles; Grigorios Korosoglou; Evangelos Giannitsis; Hugo A Katus; Henning Steen
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Exercise stress echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis: impact of baseline diastolic dysfunction and functional capacity on mortality and aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Andrew N Rassi; Wael Aljaroudi; Sahar Naderi; M Chadi Alraies; Venu Menon; Leonardo Rodriguez; Richard Grimm; Brian Griffin; Wael A Jaber
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-12

4.  Relationship of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy to the presence of diastolic dysfunction.

Authors:  Joseph M Krepp; Fay Lin; James K Min; Richard B Devereux; Peter M Okin
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 1.468

5.  Left atrial enlargement increases the risk of major adverse cardiac events independent of coronary vasodilator capacity.

Authors:  Angela S Koh; Venkatesh L Murthy; Arkadiusz Sitek; Peter Gayed; John Bruyere; Justina Wu; Marcelo F Di Carli; Sharmila Dorbala
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function: an update.

Authors:  Dimitrios Maragiannis; Sherif F Nagueh
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  Echocardiography in Arterial Hypertension.

Authors:  Giovanni de Simone; Costantino Mancusi; Roberta Esposito; Nicola De Luca; Maurizio Galderisi
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2018-05-02

Review 8.  The most important publications of the past year in echocardiography.

Authors:  A Farkhooy; F A Flachskampf
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 9.  Principles of transthoracic echocardiographic evaluation.

Authors:  Anita C Boyd; Nelson B Schiller; Liza Thomas
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 32.419

10.  Left ventricular diastolic function and long-term outcomes in patients with normal exercise echocardiographic findings.

Authors:  S Michael Gharacholou; Christopher G Scott; Paul Y Takahashi; Vuyisile T Nkomo; Robert B McCully; Nowell M Fine; Patricia A Pellikka
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 2.778

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.