BACKGROUND: Diastolic dysfunction is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction. There are limited data, however, on whether worsening of diastolic function is associated with worse prognosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We reviewed clinical records and echocardiograms of consecutive patients who had baseline echocardiograms between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2009, that showed left ventricular ejection fraction ≥55% and who subsequently had a follow-up echocardiogram within 6 to 24 months. Diastolic function was labeled as normal, mild, moderate, or severe dysfunction. All-cause mortality was determined by use of the Social Security Death Index. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression analysis with a proportional hazard model were performed to assess outcomes. A total of 1065 outpatients were identified (mean±SD age, 67.9±13.9 years; 58% male). Baseline diastolic dysfunction was present in 770 patients (72.3%), with mild being the most prevalent. On follow-up testing (mean±SD, 1.1±0.4 years), 783 patients (73%) had stable, 168 (16%) had worsening, and 114 (11%) had improved baseline diastolic function. Eighty-eight patients (8.3%) had a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction to <55% and were more likely to have advanced diastolic dysfunction (P=0.002). After a mean±SD follow-up (from the second study) of 1.6±0.8 years, 142 patients (13%) died. On multivariate analysis, a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction to <55% and any worsening of diastolic function were independently associated with increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.85; P=0.02; and hazard ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-2.59; P=0.003, respectively). CONCLUSION: In patients with normal baseline left ventricular ejection fraction, worsening of diastolic function is an independent predictor of mortality.
BACKGROUND:Diastolic dysfunction is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction. There are limited data, however, on whether worsening of diastolic function is associated with worse prognosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We reviewed clinical records and echocardiograms of consecutive patients who had baseline echocardiograms between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2009, that showed left ventricular ejection fraction ≥55% and who subsequently had a follow-up echocardiogram within 6 to 24 months. Diastolic function was labeled as normal, mild, moderate, or severe dysfunction. All-cause mortality was determined by use of the Social Security Death Index. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression analysis with a proportional hazard model were performed to assess outcomes. A total of 1065 outpatients were identified (mean±SD age, 67.9±13.9 years; 58% male). Baseline diastolic dysfunction was present in 770 patients (72.3%), with mild being the most prevalent. On follow-up testing (mean±SD, 1.1±0.4 years), 783 patients (73%) had stable, 168 (16%) had worsening, and 114 (11%) had improved baseline diastolic function. Eighty-eight patients (8.3%) had a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction to <55% and were more likely to have advanced diastolic dysfunction (P=0.002). After a mean±SD follow-up (from the second study) of 1.6±0.8 years, 142 patients (13%) died. On multivariate analysis, a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction to <55% and any worsening of diastolic function were independently associated with increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.85; P=0.02; and hazard ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-2.59; P=0.003, respectively). CONCLUSION: In patients with normal baseline left ventricular ejection fraction, worsening of diastolic function is an independent predictor of mortality.
Authors: Wael A AlJaroudi; M Chadi Alraies; Carmel Halley; Venu Menon; L Leonardo Rodriguez; Richard A Grimm; James D Thomas; Wael A Jaber Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-07-11 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Andrew N Rassi; Wael Aljaroudi; Sahar Naderi; M Chadi Alraies; Venu Menon; Leonardo Rodriguez; Richard Grimm; Brian Griffin; Wael A Jaber Journal: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther Date: 2013-12
Authors: Joseph M Krepp; Fay Lin; James K Min; Richard B Devereux; Peter M Okin Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2014-04-17 Impact factor: 1.468
Authors: Angela S Koh; Venkatesh L Murthy; Arkadiusz Sitek; Peter Gayed; John Bruyere; Justina Wu; Marcelo F Di Carli; Sharmila Dorbala Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-05-28 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Giovanni de Simone; Costantino Mancusi; Roberta Esposito; Nicola De Luca; Maurizio Galderisi Journal: High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev Date: 2018-05-02
Authors: S Michael Gharacholou; Christopher G Scott; Paul Y Takahashi; Vuyisile T Nkomo; Robert B McCully; Nowell M Fine; Patricia A Pellikka Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2013-04-20 Impact factor: 2.778