Literature DB >> 24398793

Current understanding of genetics and genetic testing and information needs and preferences of adults with inherited retinal disease.

Martin McKibbin1, Mushtaq Ahmed2, Matthew J Allsop3, Louise Downey4, Richard Gale5, Hilary Louise Grant3, Barbara Potrata3, Thomas A Willis3, Jenny Hewison3.   

Abstract

Advances in sequencing technology and the movement of genetic testing into all areas of medicine will increase opportunities for molecular confirmation of a clinical diagnosis. For health-care professionals without formal genetics training, there is a need to know what patients understand about genetics and genetic testing and their information needs and preferences for the disclosure of genetic testing results. These topics were explored during face-to-face interviews with 50 adults with inherited retinal disease, selected in order to provide a diversity of opinions. Participants had variable understanding of genetics and genetic testing, including basic concepts such as inheritance patterns and the risk to dependents, and many did not understand the term 'genetic counselling'. Most were keen for extra information on the risk to others, the process for genetic testing and how to share the information with other family members. Participants were divided as to whether genetic testing should be offered at the time of the initial diagnosis or later. Many would prefer the results to be given by face-to-face consultation, supplemented by further information in a format accessible to those with visual impairment. Health-care professionals and either leaflets or websites of trusted agencies were the preferred sources of information. Permission should be sought for disclosure of genetic information to other family members. The information needs of many patients with inherited retinal disease appear to be unmet. An understanding of their information needs and preferences is required to help health-care professionals provide optimal services that meet patient expectations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24398793      PMCID: PMC4135409          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  19 in total

1.  Introducing a new retinitis pigmentosa patient information website.

Authors:  Katherine A Smallcombe; Lisa S Kearns; David A Mackey
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.207

2.  "In sickness and in health"? Disclosures of genetic risks in dating.

Authors:  Robert L Klitzman; Meghan M Sweeney
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  An audit of genetic testing in diagnosis of inherited retinal disorders: a prerequisite for gene-specific intervention.

Authors:  Monika Pradhan; Ian Hayes; Andrea Vincent
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.207

4.  A family genetic risk communication framework: guiding tool development in genetics health services.

Authors:  Miriam E Wiens; Brenda J Wilson; Christina Honeywell; Holly Etchegary
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-01-15

5.  Attitudes regarding predictive testing for retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Eedy Mezer; Riyana Babul-Hirji; Richard Wise; Mary Chipman; Lisa DaSilva; Mary Rowell; Robin Thackray; Cheryl T Shuman; Alex V Levin
Journal:  Ophthalmic Genet       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.803

6.  Ophthalmology on the internet: what do our patients find?

Authors:  Alon Kahana; Justin L Gottlieb
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-03

Review 7.  Public understandings of genetics and health.

Authors:  C M Condit
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.438

8.  Accessibility of health information on the internet to the visually impaired user.

Authors:  Marc Lüchtenberg; Claudia Kuhli-Hattenbach; Yesim Sinangin; Christian Ohrloff; Rainer Schalnus
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 3.250

9.  Exploring the public understanding of basic genetic concepts.

Authors:  Angela D Lanie; Toby Epstein Jayaratne; Jane P Sheldon; Sharon L R Kardia; Elizabeth S Anderson; Merle Feldbaum; Elizabeth M Petty
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Understanding the impact of genetic testing for inherited retinal dystrophy.

Authors:  Ryan Combs; Marion McAllister; Katherine Payne; Jo Lowndes; Sophie Devery; Andrew R Webster; Susan M Downes; Anthony T Moore; Simon Ramsden; Graeme Black; Georgina Hall
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.246

View more
  3 in total

1.  Operationalizing the Reciprocal Engagement Model of Genetic Counseling Practice: a Framework for the Scalable Delivery of Genomic Counseling and Testing.

Authors:  Tara Schmidlen; Amy C Sturm; Shelly Hovick; Laura Scheinfeldt; J Scott Roberts; Lindsey Morr; Joseph McElroy; Amanda E Toland; Michael Christman; Julianne M O'Daniel; Erynn S Gordon; Barbara A Bernhardt; Kelly E Ormond; Kevin Sweet
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Modeling the dyadic effects of parenting, stress, and coping on parent-child communication in families tested for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer risk.

Authors:  Jada G Hamilton; Darren Mays; Tiffani DeMarco; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Willingness to pay for genetic testing for inherited retinal disease.

Authors:  Sandy Tubeuf; Thomas A Willis; Barbara Potrata; Hilary Grant; Matthew J Allsop; Mushtaq Ahmed; Jenny Hewison; Martin McKibbin
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.246

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.