Literature DB >> 15006856

Ophthalmology on the internet: what do our patients find?

Alon Kahana1, Justin L Gottlieb.   

Abstract

The Internet has become a favorite source of medical information for a growing number of patients. At the same time, content on the Internet represents an amalgamation of viewpoints, commercial interests, and various biases. A common way to access Internet information is through commercial portals with proprietary search engines. Often these search engines prioritize their rank list based on commercial interests. We evaluated whether Internet searches of ophthalmic issues are slanted toward commercial sites and whether any differences exist among the various search engines. We used age-related macular degeneration as an example. In this study, we found that some search engines are heavily tilted toward commercial partnerships, whereas others emphasize sites run by nonprofit and educational organizations. Our findings may guide physicians in recommending to their patients some internet portals rather than others. This type of evaluation can be conducted intermittently by physicians and other health care professionals to assess the type of information that reaches their patients and what biases may be influencing patient knowledge and decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15006856     DOI: 10.1001/archopht.122.3.380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  3 in total

1.  The impact of social media accounts on periocular cosmetic surgeries.

Authors:  Hayfaa S Alshaalan; Lama A AlTamimi; Reema A Alshayie; Adel H Alsuhaibani
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-11-17

2.  Age-related macular degeneration: what do patients find on the internet?

Authors:  Christina A Rennie; Shabeeba Hannan; Nick Maycock; Chee Kang
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Current understanding of genetics and genetic testing and information needs and preferences of adults with inherited retinal disease.

Authors:  Martin McKibbin; Mushtaq Ahmed; Matthew J Allsop; Louise Downey; Richard Gale; Hilary Louise Grant; Barbara Potrata; Thomas A Willis; Jenny Hewison
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.246

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.