Literature DB >> 24916649

Willingness to pay for genetic testing for inherited retinal disease.

Sandy Tubeuf1, Thomas A Willis1, Barbara Potrata1, Hilary Grant1, Matthew J Allsop1, Mushtaq Ahmed2, Jenny Hewison1, Martin McKibbin3.   

Abstract

This paper investigates the willingness of adults with inherited retinal disease to undergo and pay for diagnostic genetic testing in three hypothetical scenarios and to explore the factors that influence decision making. Fifty patients were presented with three scenarios whereby genetic testing provided increasing information: confirming the diagnosis and inheritance pattern alone, providing additional information on future visual function, and identifying in addition a new treatment which could stabilise their condition. Willingness to pay (WTP) was elicited using an iterative bidding game. Regression analysis was used to investigate the probability of agreeing to and paying for testing. Qualitative data were also reviewed to provide a comprehensive understanding of WTP and decision making. The majority of participants agreed to undergo genetic testing in each of the three scenarios. Scenario 2 was the least acceptable with 78% of participants agreeing to genetic testing. The probability of agreeing to genetic testing decreased with age. Between 72 and 96% of participants reported a WTP for genetic testing. Average WTP was £539, £1516, and £6895 for scenarios 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Older participants and participants with higher incomes were willing to pay more for testing. Qualitative data provided additional detail about the rationale behind participants' decisions. The study suggests that patients with inherited retinal disease were willing to undergo and to pay for diagnostic genetic testing, suggesting that they valued the information it may provide. However, several patients preferred not to receive prognostic information and were less willing to pay for genetic testing that yielded such detail.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24916649      PMCID: PMC4326707          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  19 in total

Review 1.  Theory versus practice: a review of 'willingness-to-pay' in health and health care.

Authors:  J A Olsen; R D Smith
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Willingness to pay methods in health care: a sceptical view.

Authors:  Richard Cookson
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  A comparison of stated preference methods for estimating monetary values.

Authors:  Mandy Ryan
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 4.  A 'league table' of contingent valuation results for pharmaceutical interventions: a hard pill to swallow?

Authors:  Tracey H Sach; Richard D Smith; David K Whynes
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: perceptions, problems, and policy responses.

Authors:  Timothy Caulfield; Amy L McGuire
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 13.739

6.  Interest in genetic testing for modest changes in breast cancer risk: implications for SNP testing.

Authors:  K D Graves; B N Peshkin; G Luta; W Tuong; M D Schwartz
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Attitudes regarding predictive testing for retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Eedy Mezer; Riyana Babul-Hirji; Richard Wise; Mary Chipman; Lisa DaSilva; Mary Rowell; Robin Thackray; Cheryl T Shuman; Alex V Levin
Journal:  Ophthalmic Genet       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.803

8.  The effect of BRCA gene testing on family relationships: A thematic analysis of qualitative interviews.

Authors:  Heather A Douglas; Rebekah J Hamilton; Robin E Grubs
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Population genetic studies of retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  J A Boughman; P M Conneally; W E Nance
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Understanding the impact of genetic testing for inherited retinal dystrophy.

Authors:  Ryan Combs; Marion McAllister; Katherine Payne; Jo Lowndes; Sophie Devery; Andrew R Webster; Susan M Downes; Anthony T Moore; Simon Ramsden; Graeme Black; Georgina Hall
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.246

View more
  3 in total

1.  Assessing feasibility of delivering pharmacogenetic testing in a community pharmacy setting.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Jivan Moaddeb; Rachel Mills; Deepak Voora
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 2.533

2.  Integrating pharmacogenetic testing into primary care.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga
Journal:  Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev       Date:  2017-11-03

3.  Assessment of willingness to pay for expanded carrier screening among women and couples undergoing preconception carrier screening.

Authors:  Elizabeth V Clarke; Jennifer L Schneider; Frances Lynch; Tia L Kauffman; Michael C Leo; Ana G Rosales; John F Dickerson; Elizabeth Shuster; Benjamin S Wilfond; Katrina A B Goddard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.