Literature DB >> 26848859

Modeling the dyadic effects of parenting, stress, and coping on parent-child communication in families tested for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer risk.

Jada G Hamilton1, Darren Mays2,3, Tiffani DeMarco4, Kenneth P Tercyak5,6,7.   

Abstract

Genetic testing for BRCA genes, associated with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer risk, is an accepted cancer control strategy. BRCA genetic testing has both medical and psychosocial implications for individuals seeking testing and their family members. However, promoting open and adaptive communication about cancer risk in the family is challenging for parents of minor children. Using prospective data collected from mothers undergoing BRCA genetic testing and their untested co-parents (N = 102 parenting dyads), we examined how maternal and co-parent characteristics independently and conjointly influenced the overall quality of parent-child communication with minor children. Statistical associations were tested in accordance with the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model. Significant Actor effects were observed among mothers, such that open parent-child communication prior to genetic testing was positively associated with open communication 6 months following receipt of genetic test results; and among co-parents, more open parent-child communication at baseline and greater perceived quality of the parenting relationship were associated with more open parent-child communication at follow-up. Partner effects were also observed: co-parents' baseline communication and confidence in their ability to communicate with their minor children about genetic testing was positively associated with open maternal parent-child communication at follow-up. These results demonstrate that for families facing the prospect of cancer genetic testing, perceptions and behaviors of both members of child-rearing couples have important implications for the overall quality of communication with their minor children, including communication about cancer risk.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA genetic testing; Cancer; Dyadic data analysis; Family communication

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26848859      PMCID: PMC4982835          DOI: 10.1007/s10689-016-9876-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  45 in total

1.  Validation of a Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale for use in STD/HIV prevention interventions.

Authors:  Jessica McDermott Sales; Robin R Milhausen; Gina M Wingood; Ralph J Diclemente; Laura F Salazar; Richard A Crosby
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2006-12-15

2.  Family system characteristics and psychological adjustment to cancer susceptibility genetic testing: a prospective study.

Authors:  I van Oostrom; H Meijers-Heijboer; H J Duivenvoorden; A H J T Bröcker-Vriends; C J van Asperen; R H Sijmons; C Seynaeve; A R van Gool; J G M Klijn; A Tibben
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.438

3.  Women with advanced breast cancer and their spouses: diversity of support and psychological distress.

Authors:  Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon; Gil Goldzweig; Michal Braun; Daliah Galinsky
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  BRCA1/2 testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families II: impact on relationships.

Authors:  Aideen McInerney-Leo; Barbara Bowles Biesecker; Donald W Hadley; Ronald G Kase; Therese R Giambarresi; Elizabeth Johnson; Caryn Lerman; Jeffery P Struewing
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 2.802

5.  Predictors of cognitive appraisals following genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  Chanita Hughes Halbert; Marc D Schwartz; Lari Wenzel; Steven Narod; Beth N Peshkin; David Cella; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2004-08

6.  Risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer in women: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Family communication between children and their parents about inherited genetic conditions: a meta-synthesis of the research.

Authors:  Alison Metcalfe; Jane Coad; Gill M Plumridge; Paramjit Gill; Peter Farndon
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Information needs of mothers regarding communicating BRCA1/2 cancer genetic test results to their children.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak; Beth N Peshkin; Tiffani A Demarco; Andrea Farkas Patenaude; Katherine A Schneider; Judy E Garber; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2007

9.  Parent-child factors and their effect on communicating BRCA1/2 test results to children.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak; Beth N Peshkin; Tiffani A DeMarco; Barbara M Brogan; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2002-06

Review 10.  The impact of parental cancer on children and the family: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Annemieke Visser; Gea A Huizinga; Winette T A van der Graaf; Harald J Hoekstra; Josette E H M Hoekstra-Weebers
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 12.111

View more
  2 in total

1.  Talking with Children About Adult-Onset Hereditary Cancer Risk: A Developmental Approach for Parents.

Authors:  Allison Werner-Lin; Shana L Merrill; Amanda C Brandt; Rachel E Barnett; Ellen T Matloff
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Parent-Child Communication and Reproductive Considerations in Families with Genetic Cancer Predisposition Syndromes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Taylor M Dattilo; Keagan G Lipak; Olivia E Clark; Alison Gehred; Amani Sampson; Gwendolyn Quinn; Kristin Zajo; Megan E Sutter; Meghan Bowman-Curci; Molly Gardner; Cynthia A Gerhardt; Leena Nahata
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 2.223

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.