Literature DB >> 24392327

Clinical outcomes after intrastromal corneal ring segments reoperation in keratoconus patients.

Leonardo Torquetti1, Guilherme Ferrara2, Franklin Almeida3, Leandro Cunha3, Paulo Ferrara1, Jesús Merayo-Lloves4.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the clinical outcomes after Ferrara intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) reoperation in patients with keratoconus.
METHODS: A total of 37 keratoconus eyes implanted with intrastromal corneal ring segments, which had an ICRS exchange, addition, reposition or removal were evaluated. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), keratometry (K), asphericity (Q) and pachymetry at the thinnest point (PTP) of the cornea were evaluated using a corneal tomography (Oculus Pentacam, USA).
RESULTS: The mean follow-up time after the reoperation was 30.5±9.7 months. The mean UCVA improved from 20/300 to 20/80 (P=0.005); the mean BCVA improved from 20/160 to 20/50 (P=0.0002), the mean keratometry reduced from 49.33±4.19D to 46.16±3.90D (P=0.0001), the mean pachymetry at the thinnest point increased from 450±42.9μm to 469±40.8μm (P=0.0001). The asphericity increased from -0.84±0.74 to -0.35±0.81 (P=0.15) and the spherical equivalent reduced from -4.64±4.87D to -3.04±3.45D (P=0.137). The changes in the asphericity and spherical equivalent were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: Ferrara ICRS implantation showed to be a reversible and readjustable surgical procedure for keratoconus treatment. Good outcomes can be obtained even after removal, addition, reposition or exchange of ICRS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  intrastromal corneal ring segments; keratoconus; reoperation

Year:  2013        PMID: 24392327      PMCID: PMC3874518          DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2013.06.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  24 in total

1.  Reversibility and exchangeability of intrastromal corneal ring segments.

Authors:  Stanley M Chan; Hamza N Khan
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  [Predictive factors for successful Ferrara intracorneal ring segment implantation in keratoconus].

Authors:  E Ancèle; F Malecaze; J-L Arné; P Fournié
Journal:  J Fr Ophtalmol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 0.818

3.  KeraRing intrastromal corneal ring segments for correction of keratoconus.

Authors:  Almutez M Gharaibeh; Sana' M Muhsen; Ilham B AbuKhader; Osama H Ababneh; Mohammed A Abu-Ameerh; Muawyah D Albdour
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  Treatment of keratoconus with Ferrara ICRS and consideration of the efficacy of the Ferrara nomogram in a 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Paolo Maria Pesando; Maria Pia Ghiringhello; Giuseppe Di Meglio; Salvatore Romeo
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.597

5.  Biomechanical and morphological corneal response to placement of intrastromal corneal ring segments for keratoconus.

Authors:  Caroline Dauwe; David Touboul; Cynthia J Roberts; Ashraf M Mahmoud; Julien Kérautret; Pierre Fournier; François Malecaze; Joseph Colin
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Intrastromal corneal ring segments to correct low myopia in eyes with irregular or abnormal topography including forme fruste keratoconus: 4-year follow-up.

Authors:  José L Güell; Merce Morral; Cecilia Salinas; Daniel Elies; Oscar Gris; Felicidad Manero
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  Comparison of mechanical and femtosecond laser tunnel creation for intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation in keratoconus: prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Anil Kubaloglu; Esin Sogutlu Sari; Yasin Cinar; Kürşat Cingu; Arif Koytak; Erol Coşkun; Yusuf Ozertürk
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment parameters in mild keratoconus.

Authors:  Bruno M Fontes; Renato Ambrósio; Daniela Jardim; Guillermo C Velarde; Walton Nosé
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in keratoectasia: findings using the Reichert ocular response analyzer.

Authors:  Caitriona Kirwan; Donal O'Malley; Michael O'Keefe
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 3.250

10.  Evaluation of intrastromal corneal ring segments for treatment of keratoconus with a mechanical implantation technique.

Authors:  Zeki Tunc; Firat Helvacioglu; Sadik Sencan
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.848

View more
  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of anterior and posterior surfaces of the cornea using a dual Scheimpflug analyzer in keratoconus patients implanted with intrastromal corneal ring segments.

Authors:  Leonardo Torquetti; Carlos Arce; Jesús Merayo-Lloves; Guilherme Ferrara; Paulo Ferrara; Brenno Signorelli; Armando Signorelli
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Modification of the Intrastromal Ring Position according to Postimplant Visual and Refractive Failure: Report of Two Cases.

Authors:  Luis Izquierdo; Josefina A Mejías Smith; Jose R Lievano; Ramón Sarquis; Maria A Henriquez
Journal:  Case Rep Ophthalmol Med       Date:  2019-06-04

3.  Evaluation of a Tangential Map-Based Nomogram for Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments' Implantation in Keratoconus: One Year Results.

Authors:  Adel Galal Zaky; Mahmoud Tawfik KhalafAllah; Abdelrahman Elsebaey Sarhan; Moataz Faiz Elsawy
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 1.909

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.