Literature DB >> 24385247

Learning curve and robot set-up/operative times in singly docked totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Subhashini Ayloo1, Eduardo Fernandes, Nabajit Choudhury.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The robotic platform might offer superior ergonomics over other minimally invasive approaches. However, the increased time required for instrument set-up, operations, and surgical training are perceived as major drawbacks. There is limited literature on this topic, therefore we report our experience at an academic tertiary medical center in the USA. The primary aim of this study was to analyze the learning curve and the times for necessary steps for singly docked totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RREYGB).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From November 2010 to April 2013, all consecutive patients who underwent RREYGB were retrospectively analyzed from a prospectively maintained database. Variables of interest for this study were patient demographics, preoperative body mass index, previous surgical history, clinically relevant perioperative events, and operative times for various steps in the procedure.
RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 32 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 39.9 ± 9.7 years (range 25-60), preoperative weight was 120.9 ± 21.5 kg (range 76.7-184.6), and body mass index (BMI) was 44.7 ± 5.3 kg/m(2) (range 36.1-61). The mean total operative time was 187.3 ± 36.4 min (range 130-261). The time necessary for trocar placement was 11.9 ± 4.5 min (range 4-23), robot set-up was 8.5 ± 3.6 min (range 3-20), pouch creation was 32 ± 10.11 min (range 16-56), gastrojejunal anastomosis was 59.5 ± 12.3 min (range 39-90), jejunojejunal anastomosis was 33.5 ± 9.6 min (range 18-65), and endoscopy/hemostasis was 12.9 ± 7.2 min (range 2-34). Operative time significantly improved after eight cases.
CONCLUSION: In a high-volume established robotic bariatric center, robot set-up, operative times, and learning curve are shorter than previously reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24385247     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3362-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  17 in total

1.  The learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is 100 cases.

Authors:  P Schauer; S Ikramuddin; G Hamad; W Gourash
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-12-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Conor P Delaney; A Craig Lynch; Anthony J Senagore; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Robotic surgery and resident training.

Authors:  D A De Ugarte; D A Etzioni; C Gracia; J B Atkinson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-28       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Analysis of procedure time in robot-assisted surgery: comparative study in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Jelle P Ruurda; Paul L Visser; Ivo A M J Broeders
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2003

5.  Totally endoscopic quadruple coronary artery bypass grafting is feasible using robotic technology.

Authors:  Johannes Bonatti; Brody Wehman; Andreas R de Biasi; Jean Jeudy; Bartley Griffith; Eric J Lehr
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Marie Fidela R Paraiso; Beri Ridgeway; Amy J Park; J Eric Jelovsek; Matthew D Barber; Tommaso Falcone; Jon I Einarsson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Laparoscopic robot-assisted pancreas transplantation: first world experience.

Authors:  Ugo Boggi; Stefano Signori; Fabio Vistoli; Simone D'Imporzano; Gabriella Amorese; Giovanni Consani; Fabio Guarracino; Piero Marchetti; Daniele Focosi; Franco Mosca
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Learning curve for robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Nicolas C Buchs; François Pugin; Pascal Bucher; Monika E Hagen; Gilles Chassot; Pascale Koutny-Fong; Philippe Morel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  A prospective study comparing operative time in conventional laparoscopic and robotically assisted Thal semifundoplication in children.

Authors:  Mark Lehnert; Bernd Richter; Peter A Beyer; Klaus Heller
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.545

10.  Outcomes and costs associated with robotic colectomy in the minimally invasive era.

Authors:  Joshua A Tyler; Justin P Fox; Mayur M Desai; W Brian Perry; Sean C Glasgow
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Robotic vs. Laparoscopic Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Konstantinos P Economopoulos; Vasileios Theocharidis; Travis J McKenzie; Theodoros N Sergentanis; Theodora Psaltopoulou
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  A systematic review of the learning curve in robotic surgery: range and heterogeneity.

Authors:  I Kassite; T Bejan-Angoulvant; H Lardy; A Binet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis using the 2015-2016 MBSAQIP database.

Authors:  Raul Sebastian; Melanie H Howell; Kai-Hua Chang; Gina Adrales; Thomas Magnuson; Michael Schweitzer; Hien Nguyen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: operative results in 100 patients.

Authors:  Carlos Eduardo Domene; Paula Volpe; Frederico A Heitor
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2014

5.  Comparative Effectiveness of Teaching Obstetrics and Gynaecological Procedural Skills on Patients versus Models: A randomized trial.

Authors:  Shereen Zulfiqar Bhutta; Haleema Yasmin
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.088

6.  INFLUENCE OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE LAPAROSCOPIC EXPERIENCE SKILLS ON ROBOTIC SURGERY DEXTERITY.

Authors:  Marcos Belotto; Larissa Coutinho; Adhemar M Pacheco-Jr; Anuar I Mitre; Eduardo Antunes da Fonseca
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2022-01-05

7.  First 101 Robotic General Surgery Cases in a Community Hospital.

Authors:  Rodolfo J Oviedo; Jarrod C Robertson; Sharifah Alrajhi
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.