Literature DB >> 12658424

Robotic surgery and resident training.

D A De Ugarte1, D A Etzioni, C Gracia, J B Atkinson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robotic technology promises to have an important future in surgery, but few residency programs incorporate robotics into surgical training. We sought to compare the speed and accuracy with which junior residents could perform laparoscopic tasks using both a robotic surgical device (Zeus MicroWrist) and conventional laparoscopic instruments.
METHODS: Twelve residents performed exercises of progressive difficulty in an inanimate model using both the robot and conventional laparoscopy. Analysis of variance statistical analysis was used to compare task time and suturing accuracy scores.
RESULTS: Grasping and suturing exercises were performed significantly faster with conventional laparoscopic instruments than with the robot. However, no difference in task time was noted for intracorporeal knot tying. Accuracy scores for suturing were higher for the robot.
CONCLUSIONS: Junior residents can be instructed easily and quickly in both robotic and conventional advanced laparoscopic skills. The utility of robotic surgical devices in resident training requires further investigation.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12658424     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-8745-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  13 in total

1.  Validated robotic laparoscopic surgical training in a virtual-reality environment.

Authors:  Dimitrios Katsavelis; Ka-Chun Siu; Bernadette Brown-Clerk; Irene H Lee; Yong Kwon Lee; Dmitry Oleynikov; Nick Stergiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Objective evaluation of expert and novice performance during robotic surgical training tasks.

Authors:  Timothy N Judkins; Dmitry Oleynikov; Nick Stergiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Learning curve and robot set-up/operative times in singly docked totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Subhashini Ayloo; Eduardo Fernandes; Nabajit Choudhury
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Robotic-assisted microvascular surgery: skill acquisition in a rat model.

Authors:  Nicholas S Clarke; Johnathan Price; Travis Boyd; Stefano Salizzoni; Kenton J Zehr; Alejandro Nieponice; Pietro Bajona
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-08-10

5.  Objective evaluation of expert performance during human robotic surgical procedures.

Authors:  Timothy N Judkins; Dmitry Oleynikov; Nick Stergiou
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-01-04

6.  How to successfully implement a robotic pediatric surgery program: lessons learned after 96 procedures.

Authors:  Guénolée de Lambert; Laurent Fourcade; Joachim Centi; Fabien Fredon; Karim Braik; Caroline Szwarc; Bernard Longis; Hubert Lardy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Effects of robotic manipulators on movements of novices and surgeons.

Authors:  Ilana Nisky; Allison M Okamura; Michael H Hsieh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Robotic surgery training and performance: identifying objective variables for quantifying the extent of proficiency.

Authors:  K Narazaki; D Oleynikov; N Stergiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 3.453

9.  Robotic surgery and training: electromyographic correlates of robotic laparoscopic training.

Authors:  T N Judkins; D Oleynikov; K Narazaki; N Stergiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-02-27       Impact factor: 3.453

10.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic gynecologic procedures in a fellowship training program.

Authors:  Paula S Lee; Amy Bland; Fidel A Valea; Laura J Havrilesky; Andrew Berchuck; Angeles Alvarez Secord
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.