Literature DB >> 14708755

Analysis of procedure time in robot-assisted surgery: comparative study in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Jelle P Ruurda1, Paul L Visser, Ivo A M J Broeders.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Robotic surgery systems have been introduced to deal with the basic disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery. However, working with these systems may lead to time loss due to additional robot-specific tasks, such as set-up of equipment and sterile draping of the system. To evaluate loss of time in robot-assisted surgery, we compared 10 robot-assisted cholecystectomies to 10 standard laparoscopic cholecystectomies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The robot-assisted procedures were performed with the da Vinci telemanipulation system. The total time in the operating room (OR) was scored and divided into preoperative, operative, and postoperative phases. These phases were further divided into smaller time-frames to precisely define moments of time loss.
RESULTS: The most significant difference between the two groups was found in the preoperative phase. Robot-related tasks led to time loss in all time-frames of this phase. In the operative phase, the trocar entry time-frame was longer in robot-assisted cases than in standard procedures. Additionally, postoperative OR clearing was longer in the robot-assisted cases. Total operating time did not differ significantly between the two procedures.
CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted surgery leads to time loss during preparation of routine laparoscopic procedures.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14708755     DOI: 10.3109/10929080309146099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Aided Surg        ISSN: 1092-9088


  12 in total

Review 1.  Robotic general surgery: current practice, evidence, and perspective.

Authors:  M Jung; P Morel; L Buehler; N C Buchs; M E Hagen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Caiwen Han; Xinyi Shan; Liang Yao; Peijing Yan; Meixuan Li; Lidong Hu; Hongwei Tian; Wutang Jing; Binbin Du; Lixia Wang; Kehu Yang; Tiankang Guo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Prospective study comparing standard and robotically assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Peter Kornprat; Georg Werkgartner; Herwig Cerwenka; Heinz Bacher; Azab El-Shabrawi; Peter Rehak; Hans Jörg Mischinger
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2006-05-06       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  Next-generation robotics in gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  James M Kinross; Sam E Mason; George Mylonas; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 46.802

5.  Learning curve and robot set-up/operative times in singly docked totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Subhashini Ayloo; Eduardo Fernandes; Nabajit Choudhury
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Robotic surgery in comparison to the open and laparoscopic approaches in the field of urology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Afra Zahid; Muhammad Ayyan; Minaam Farooq; Huzaifa Ahmad Cheema; Abia Shahid; Faiza Naeem; Muhammad Abdullah Ilyas; Shehreen Sohail
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-05-08

7.  Feasibility and Efficacy of Single-Port Robotic Cholecystectomy Using the da Vinci SP® Platform.

Authors:  Wan-Joon Kim; Sae-Byeol Choi; Wan-Bae Kim
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.789

Review 8.  Feasibility and Usefulness of a Joystick-Guided Robotic Scope Holder (Soloassist) in Laparoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  Yasushi Ohmura; Mari Nakagawa; Hiromitsu Suzuki; Kazutoshi Kotani; Atsushi Teramoto
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2018-01-31

Review 9.  Telerobotic gastrointestinal surgery: phase 2--safety and efficacy.

Authors:  G H Ballantyne
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 3.453

10.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic rectovaginopexy for rectal prolapse: a prospective cohort study on feasibility and safety.

Authors:  Werner A Draaisma; Dorothée H Nieuwenhuis; Lucas W M Janssen; Ivo A M J Broeders
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-01-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.