Literature DB >> 16863843

A prospective study comparing operative time in conventional laparoscopic and robotically assisted Thal semifundoplication in children.

Mark Lehnert1, Bernd Richter, Peter A Beyer, Klaus Heller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is not clear if robotically assisted surgery (providing articulating instruments, 3-dimensional vision, intuitive ergonomics) performed in pediatric patients offers the same advantages over conventional surgery as in adult patients. In the laboratory setting, robots require less time to perform certain tasks. Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that the time required to perform a robotically assisted laparoscopic Thal semifundoplication is different compared with a conventional laparoscopic procedure in children.
METHODS: The time required to perform single operative steps was prospectively recorded in 10 consecutively performed Thal semifundoplications with the use of a robot (da Vinci) and in 10 consecutively performed operations done by conventional laparoscopy.
RESULTS: No conversion to an open operation was necessary, and there were no intraoperative complications throughout the study and no postoperative complications up to 14 months after surgery. Total operative time was similar in both groups. In the robotically assisted group, time for setup was significantly longer (20.8 +/- 7.5 vs 34.6 +/- 9.2 minutes, P < .05), but dissection of the hiatal region as the most challenging operative step was accomplished 34% faster in the robotically assisted group (30.8 +/- 8.7 vs 20.2 +/- 5.3 minutes, P < .05).
CONCLUSION: At the current level of technology, the robotic system is superior compared with established standard laparoscopic techniques requiring tissue preparation; however, the potential benefit in operating time is counterbalanced by the increased complexity of setting up the system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16863843     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.04.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  16 in total

1.  Robotic-assisted surgery in children: advantages and limitations.

Authors:  Abdulrahman Al-Bassam
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-04-10

Review 2.  Haptics - touchfeedback technology widening the horizon of medicine.

Authors:  Shalini Kapoor; Pallak Arora; Vikas Kapoor; Mahesh Jayachandran; Manish Tiwari
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-03-15

3.  Anesthesia experience of pediatric robotic surgery in a University Hospital.

Authors:  Wadha Mubarak Alotaibi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-06-13

4.  Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted Nissen fundoplication in an infant pig model.

Authors:  Alexandra Krauss; Thomas Neumuth; Robin Wachowiak; Bernd Donaubauer; Werner Korb; Oliver Burgert; Oliver J Muensterer
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  Learning curve and robot set-up/operative times in singly docked totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Subhashini Ayloo; Eduardo Fernandes; Nabajit Choudhury
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Whether robot-assisted laparoscopic fundoplication is better for gastroesophageal reflux disease in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun Mi; Yingxin Kang; Xiao Chen; Bingjun Wang; Zhiping Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Specific learning curve for port placement and docking of da Vinci(®) Surgical System: one surgeon's experience in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  F Dal Moro; S Secco; C Valotto; W Artibani; F Zattoni
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-09-27

8.  How to successfully implement a robotic pediatric surgery program: lessons learned after 96 procedures.

Authors:  Guénolée de Lambert; Laurent Fourcade; Joachim Centi; Fabien Fredon; Karim Braik; Caroline Szwarc; Bernard Longis; Hubert Lardy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease and upside-down stomach using the Da Vinci robotic system. A prospective study.

Authors:  Jens Hartmann; Christoph A Jacobi; Charalambos Menenakos; Mahmoud Ismail; Chris Braumann
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review.

Authors:  O A J van der Meijden; M P Schijven
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.