Literature DB >> 24378551

Pancreaticoduodenectomy: outcomes in a low-volume, specialised Hepato Pancreato Biliary unit.

H A Kanhere1, M I Trochsler, M H Kanhere, A N Lord, G J Maddern.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) at a low-volume specialised Hepato Pancreato Biliary (HPB) unit. Volume outcome analyses show significantly better results for patients undergoing PD at high-volume centres (Begg et al. JAMA 280:1747-1751, 1998; Finlayson et al. Arch Surg 138:721-725, 2003; Birkmeyer et al. N Engl J Med 346:1128-1137, 2002; Gouma et al. Ann Surg 232:786-795, 2000). Centralisation of PD seems to be the logical conclusion to be drawn from these results. In countries like Australia with a small and widely dispersed population, centralisation may not be always feasible. Alternative strategy would be to have similar systems in place to those in high-volume centres to achieve similar results at low-volume centres. Many Australian tertiary care centres perform low to medium volumes of PD (Chen et al. HPB 12:101-108, 2010; Kwok et al. ANZ J Surg 80:605-608, 2010; Barnett and Collier ANZ J Surg 76:563-568, 2006; Samra et al. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 10:415-421, 2011). Most of these have a specialised HPB unit, accredited by the Australia and New Zealand Hepatic pancreatic and biliary association (ANZHPBA), as training units for post fellowship training in HPB surgery. It is imperative to perform outcome-based analyses in these units to ensure safety and high quality of care.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of database for periampullary carcinoma (1998 till date) was performed in an ANZHPBA accredited HPB unit based at a tertiary care teaching hospital in South Australia. Because age older than 74 years is shown to be a predictive marker of increased morbidity and mortality after a PD, we analysed the outcomes in this subset of patients separately.
RESULTS: Fifty-three patients underwent PD in 14 years. Overall mortality was 3.8 %. The last in hospital mortality was in 1999. The morbidity rates and the oncologic outcomes were similar to those in high-volume units.
CONCLUSIONS: PD can be safely performed in a low-volume specialised unit at centres where the amenities and processes at high-volume centres can be replicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24378551     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-2431-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  32 in total

1.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: A single-institution experience.

Authors:  Jordan M Winter; John L Cameron; Kurtis A Campbell; Meghan A Arnold; David C Chang; Joann Coleman; Mary B Hodgin; Patricia K Sauter; Ralph H Hruban; Taylor S Riall; Richard D Schulick; Michael A Choti; Keith D Lillemoe; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  One hundred and seventy-eight consecutive pancreatoduodenectomies without mortality: role of the multidisciplinary approach.

Authors:  Jaswinder S Samra; Raul Alvarado Bachmann; Julian Choi; Anthony Gill; Michael Neale; Vikram Puttaswamy; Cameron Bell; Ian Norton; Sarah Cho; Steven Blome; Ritchie Maher; Sivakumar Gananadha; Thomas J Hugh
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int       Date:  2011-08

4.  Effect of meeting Leapfrog volume thresholds on complication rates following complex surgical procedures.

Authors:  Veerasathpurush Allareddy; Marcia M Ward; Veerajalandhar Allareddy; Badrinath R Konety
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a 20-year experience in 516 patients.

Authors:  C Max Schmidt; Emilie S Powell; Constantin T Yiannoutsos; Thomas J Howard; Eric A Wiebke; Chad A Wiesenauer; Joel A Baumgardner; Oscar W Cummings; Lewis E Jacobson; Thomas A Broadie; David F Canal; Robert J Goulet; Eardie A Curie; Higinia Cardenes; John M Watkins; Patrick J Loehrer; Keith D Lillemoe; James A Madura
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2004-07

6.  Hospital volume and operative mortality in cancer surgery: a national study.

Authors:  Emily V A Finlayson; Philip P Goodney; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-07

7.  Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery.

Authors:  C B Begg; L D Cramer; W J Hoskins; M F Brennan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-25       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Effect of centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on nationwide hospital mortality and length of stay.

Authors:  B Topal; S Van de Sande; S Fieuws; F Penninckx
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  How many lymph nodes properly stage a periampullary malignancy?

Authors:  Juan C Gutierrez; Dido Franceschi; Leonidas G Koniaris
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Patient and hospital characteristics on the variance of perioperative outcomes for pancreatic resection in the United States: a plea for outcome-based and not volume-based referral guidelines.

Authors:  Swee H Teh; Brian S Diggs; Clifford W Deveney; Brett C Sheppard
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2009-08
View more
  7 in total

1.  Impact of surgical experience on management and outcome of pancreatic surgery performed in high- and low-volume centers.

Authors:  Marco Stella; Massimiliano Bissolati; Daniele Gentile; Alessandro Arriciati
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-02-18

2.  The Impact of Increasing Hospital Volume on 90-Day Postoperative Outcomes Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Daniel J Kagedan; Nik Goyert; Qing Li; Lawrence Paszat; Alexander Kiss; Craig C Earle; Paul J Karanicolas; Alice C Wei; Nicole Mittmann; Natalie G Coburn
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  The 13-year experience of performing pancreaticoduodenectomy in a mid-volume municipal hospital.

Authors:  Hongbeom Kim; Jung Kee Chung; Young Joon Ahn; Hae Won Lee; In Mok Jung
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 1.859

4.  Postoperative Outcomes Analysis After Pancreatic Duct Occlusion: A Safe Option to Treat the Pancreatic Stump After Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Low-Volume Centers.

Authors:  Antonio Giuliani; Pasquale Avella; Anna Lucia Segreto; Maria Lucia Izzo; Antonio Buondonno; Mariagrazia Coluzzi; Micaela Cappuccio; Maria Chiara Brunese; Roberto Vaschetti; Andrea Scacchi; Germano Guerra; Bruno Amato; Fulvio Calise; Aldo Rocca
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-12-21

5.  Outcome after implementation of a clinical pathway for pancreaticoduodenectomy in a low volume centre.

Authors:  Thomas Zacharias; Dan Sebastien; Ferreira Nelio
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2022-06-20

6.  One hundred sixty pancreaticoduodenectomies for periampullary cancers in a growing-volume setting: a single-institution and a single-surgeon's experience.

Authors:  Seong-Hwan Chang
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 1.859

7.  Impact of surgeon experience on routine prolapse operations.

Authors:  Emil Nüssler; Jacob Kjær Eskildsen; Emil Karl Nüssler; Marie Bixo; Mats Löfgren
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.894

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.