Literature DB >> 20054271

Effect of meeting Leapfrog volume thresholds on complication rates following complex surgical procedures.

Veerasathpurush Allareddy1, Marcia M Ward, Veerajalandhar Allareddy, Badrinath R Konety.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is limited published data on the relationship between hospital volume and postoperative complications. The objectives of the current study are to examine the association between hospital volume and complications and also to examine the association between complications and in-hospital mortality following 5 complex surgical procedures.
METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample for years 2000 to 2003 was used. Patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (AAA), pancreatectomy (PAN), and esophagectomy (ESO) as primary procedures were selected. Hospital volumes were calculated as suggested by the Leapfrog Group evidence-based hospital referral criteria. The association between hospital volume and complications were examined by multivariable logistic regression analyses, adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics.
RESULTS: A total of 261551 CABG, 573072 PCI, 35104 AAA, 4931 PAN, and 2473 ESO procedures were selected for analysis. A total of 580 hospitals performed the CABG procedures during the study period in this dataset. The corresponding numbers of hospitals for PCI, AAA, PAN, and ESO were 714, 1207, 758, and 555 respectively. In-hospital complication rates following CABG, PCI, AAA, PAN, and ESO were 26.45%, 6.74%, 23.81%, 39.28%, and 46.30%, respectively. High-volume hospitals for all the procedures were associated with lower odds for in-hospital mortality when compared with low-volume hospitals (P < 0.05). High-volume hospitals were associated with significantly lower odds for at least one complication following 3 of the 5 procedures (PCI, AAA, and PAN) and specifically for significantly lower odds for respiratory complications following CABG, AAA, and PAN, digestive complications following PAN, hemorrhage/hematoma complications following PCI, and septicemia following PCI and PAN when compared with low-volume hospitals (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Lower mortality rates in high-volume hospitals can be partly, though not completely, attributed to lower complication rates. Future studies must focus on identifying other potential pathways for reduced mortality in high-volume hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20054271     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cb853f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  14 in total

1.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy: outcomes in a low-volume, specialised Hepato Pancreato Biliary unit.

Authors:  H A Kanhere; M I Trochsler; M H Kanhere; A N Lord; G J Maddern
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Preparing for prospective clinical trials: a national initiative of an excellence registry for consecutive pancreatic cancer resections.

Authors:  Odo Gangl; Klaus Sahora; Peter Kornprat; Christian Margreiter; Florian Primavesi; Evelyne Bareck; Martin Schindl; Friedrich Längle; Dietmar Öfner; Hans-Jörg Mischinger; Johann Pratschke; Michael Gnant; Reinhold Függer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Clinical utility of the Revised Cardiac Risk Index in non-cardiac surgery for elderly patients: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yuki Hirano; Hiroya Takeuchi; Koichi Suda; Takashi Oyama; Rieko Nakamura; Tsunehiro Takahashi; Hirofumi Kawakubo; Norihito Wada; Yoshiro Saikawa; Hideaki Obara; Hiromitsu Jinno; Hirotoshi Hasegawa; Minoru Tanabe; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Unplanned reoperation and reintervention after pancreatic resections: an analysis of risk factors.

Authors:  Odo Gangl; Uwe Fröschl; Wolfgang Hofer; Jürgen Huber; Thomas Sautner; Reinhold Függer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Association between ethnicity and prostate cancer outcomes across hospital and surgeon volume groups.

Authors:  Ravishankar Jayadevappa; Sumedha Chhatre; Jerry C Johnson; Stanley Bruce Malkowicz
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Relationship between patient safety and hospital surgical volume.

Authors:  Tina Hernandez-Boussard; John R Downey; Kathryn McDonald; John M Morton
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Does the use of neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma increase postoperative morbidity and mortality rates?

Authors:  Amanda B Cooper; Abhishek D Parmar; Taylor S Riall; Bruce L Hall; Matthew H G Katz; Thomas A Aloia; Henry A Pitt
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Evolution of standardized clinical pathways: refining multidisciplinary care and process to improve outcomes of the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Sheraz R Markar; Henner Schmidt; Sonia Kunz; Artur Bodnar; Michal Hubka; Donald E Low
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Determinants of Outcomes Following Resection for Pancreatic Cancer-a Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Mary A Waterhouse; Elizabeth A Burmeister; Dianne L O'Connell; Emma L Ballard; Susan J Jordan; Neil D Merrett; David Goldstein; David Wyld; Monika Janda; Vanessa L Beesley; Madeleine E Payne; Helen M Gooden; Rachel E Neale
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Assessing surgical quality: comparison of general and procedure-specific morbidity estimation models for the risk adjustment of pancreaticoduodenectomy outcomes.

Authors:  C Ansorge; P Lindström; L Strömmer; J Blomberg; L Lundell; A Andrén-Sandberg; M Del Chiaro; R Segersvärd
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.