Literature DB >> 17701264

How many lymph nodes properly stage a periampullary malignancy?

Juan C Gutierrez1, Dido Franceschi, Leonidas G Koniaris.   

Abstract

The impact of lymphadenectomy in prognosis and staging in periampullary malignancies remains largely undefined. We examined all pancreaticoduodenectomies for periampullary carcinomas in the SEER cancer registry from 1993 through 2003. Overall, 5465 pancreaticoduodenectomies for nonmetastatic periampullary carcinomas were identified. The cohort was comprised of 62.5% pancreatic, 18.9% ampullary, 11.6% distal bile duct, and 7.0% duodenal cancers. A linear association between the number of lymph nodes (LNs) examined and overall survival was observed overall and for pancreas and ampullary cancers for node-negative (N0) disease. Median survival for all patients with localized, N0 disease improved from 24 to 31 months, with sampling of a minimum of 10 LNs, whereas 2 and 5-year survival improved from 52 and 29%, with <10 nodes examined to 58 and 37% with 10+ nodes examined (P<0.001). A 1-month median survival advantage was seen in patients with node-positive disease when more than 10 lymph nodes examined (15 versus 16 months, P<0.001). Significantly better median survival and cure rates are observed after pancreaticoduodenectomy for localized periampullary adenocarcinoma when a minimum of 10 lymph nodes are examined. This benefit likely represents more accurate staging. To optimize the prognostic accuracy and prevent stage migration errors in multicenter trials a minimum of 10 lymph nodes should be obtained and examined before the determination of node-negative disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17701264     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-007-0251-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  26 in total

1.  Surgical curability and prognosis for standard versus extended resection for T1 carcinoma of the pancreas.

Authors:  K Satake; H Nishiwaki; H Yokomatsu; Y Kawazoe; K Kim; A Haku; K Umeyama; I Miyazaki
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1992-09

2.  Is adjuvant 5-FU-based chemoradiotherapy for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma beneficial? A meta-analysis of an unanswered question.

Authors:  Amit Khanna; Gail R Walker; Alan S Livingstone; Kristopher L Arheart; Caio Rocha-Lima; Leonidas G Koniaris
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Lymph node recovery from colorectal resection specimens removed for adenocarcinoma. Trends over time and a recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be recovered.

Authors:  N S Goldstein; W Sanford; M Coffey; L J Layfield
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 4.  Pancreatic cancer: state-of-the-art care.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; C J Yeo; J L Cameron
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy associated with pancreatoduodenectomy in the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Lymphadenectomy Study Group.

Authors:  S Pedrazzoli; V DiCarlo; R Dionigi; F Mosca; P Pederzoli; C Pasquali; G Klöppel; K Dhaene; F Michelassi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Markus W Büchler; Markus Wagner; Bruno M Schmied; Waldemar Uhl; Helmut Friess; Kaspar Z'graggen
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-12

7.  The number of metastatic lymph nodes: a promising prognostic determinant for gastric carcinoma in the latest edition of the TNM classification.

Authors:  Y Kodera; Y Yamamura; Y Shimizu; A Torii; T Hirai; K Yasui; T Morimoto; T Kato; T Kito
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Cancer statistics, 2006.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Elizabeth Ward; Taylor Murray; Jiaquan Xu; Carol Smigal; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer of the head of the pancreas. 201 patients.

Authors:  C J Yeo; J L Cameron; K D Lillemoe; J V Sitzmann; R H Hruban; S N Goodman; W C Dooley; J Coleman; H A Pitt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma, part 2: randomized controlled trial evaluating survival, morbidity, and mortality.

Authors:  Charles J Yeo; John L Cameron; Keith D Lillemoe; Taylor A Sohn; Kurtis A Campbell; Patricia K Sauter; JoAnn Coleman; Ross A Abrams; Ralph H Hruban
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  12 in total

1.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy: outcomes in a low-volume, specialised Hepato Pancreato Biliary unit.

Authors:  H A Kanhere; M I Trochsler; M H Kanhere; A N Lord; G J Maddern
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Prognostic value of the lymph node ratio after resection of periampullary carcinomas.

Authors:  Shahid G Farid; Gavin A Falk; Daniel Joyce; Sricharan Chalikonda; R Matthew Walsh; Andrew M Smith; Gareth Morris-Stiff
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Substaging Nodal Status in Ampullary Carcinomas has Significant Prognostic Value: Proposed Revised Staging Based on an Analysis of 313 Well-Characterized Cases.

Authors:  Serdar Balci; Olca Basturk; Burcu Saka; Pelin Bagci; Lauren M Postlewait; Takuma Tajiri; Kee-Taek Jang; Nobuyuki Ohike; Grace E Kim; Alyssa Krasinskas; Hyejeong Choi; Juan M Sarmiento; David A Kooby; Bassel F El-Rayes; Jessica H Knight; Michael Goodman; Gizem Akkas; Michelle D Reid; Shishir K Maithel; Volkan Adsay
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Determining the Adequate Examined Lymph Node Count in Resected Ampullary Adenocarcinoma-A National Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ibrahim Nassour; Alana Christie; Michael A Choti; John C Mansour; Rebecca M Minter; Patricio M Polanco; Mathew M Augustine; Matthew R Porembka; Xian-Jin Xie; Sam C Wang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Outcomes of malignant CNS ependymomas: an examination of 2408 cases through the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1973-2005).

Authors:  Dayron Rodríguez; Michael C Cheung; Nadine Housri; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa; Kevin Camphausen; Leonidas G Koniaris
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  Prognostic factors for survival in patients with epithelioid sarcoma: 441 cases from the SEER database.

Authors:  Muhammad Umar Jawad; Jason Extein; Elijah S Min; Sean P Scully
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Defining the role of surgery for primary gastrointestinal tract melanoma.

Authors:  Michael C Cheung; Eduardo A Perez; Manuel A Molina; Xiaoling Jin; Juan C Gutierrez; Dido Franceschi; Alan S Livingstone; Leonidas G Koniaris
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Factors predicting adequate lymph node yield in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for malignancy.

Authors:  Marek Sierzega; Łukasz Bobrzyński; Andrzej Matyja; Jan Kulig
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Skeletal Plasmacytoma: progression of disease and impact of local treatment; an analysis of SEER database.

Authors:  Muhammad Umar Jawad; Sean P Scully
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 17.388

10.  The Association between Survival and the Pathologic Features of Periampullary Tumors Varies over Time.

Authors:  Jennifer K Plichta; Anjali S Godambe; Zachary Fridirici; Sherri Yong; James M Sinacore; Gerard J Abood; Gerard V Aranha
Journal:  HPB Surg       Date:  2014-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.