Literature DB >> 15249403

Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a 20-year experience in 516 patients.

C Max Schmidt1, Emilie S Powell, Constantin T Yiannoutsos, Thomas J Howard, Eric A Wiebke, Chad A Wiesenauer, Joel A Baumgardner, Oscar W Cummings, Lewis E Jacobson, Thomas A Broadie, David F Canal, Robert J Goulet, Eardie A Curie, Higinia Cardenes, John M Watkins, Patrick J Loehrer, Keith D Lillemoe, James A Madura.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a safe procedure for a variety of periampullary conditions.
DESIGN: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database.
SETTING: Academic tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 516 consecutive patients who underwent PD. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient outcomes and survival factors.
RESULTS: Pathological examination demonstrated 57% periampullary cancers, 22% chronic pancreatitis, 12% cystic neoplasms, 4% islet cell neoplasms, and 5% other. Fifty-one percent of patients underwent pylorus preservation. Median operating time was 5 hours; blood loss, 1300 mL; and transfusion requirement, 1.5 U. Postoperative complications occurred in 43% of patients, including cardiopulmonary events (15%), fistula (9%), delayed gastric emptying (7%), and sepsis (6%). Additional surgery was required in 3% of patients, most commonly because of bleeding. Perioperative mortality was 3.9% overall but only 1.8% in patients with chronic pancreatitis; 25% of patients who died had preoperative complications associated with their periampullary condition. Three-year survival was 15% after resection for pancreatic cancer, 42% for duodenal cancer, 53% for ampullary cancer, and 62% for bile duct cancer. Univariate predictors of long-term survival in patients with periampullary adenocarcinoma included elevated glucose levels, liver function test results, abnormal tumor markers, blood loss, transfusion requirement, type of operation, and pathologic findings (periampullary adenocarcinoma type, differentiation, and margin and node status). Multivariate predictors were serum total bilirubin level, blood loss, operation type, diagnosis, and lymph node status.
CONCLUSIONS: Pancreaticoduodenectomy continues to be associated with considerable morbidity. With careful patient selection, PD can be performed safely. Long-term survival in patients with periampullary adenocarcinoma can be predicted by preoperative laboratory values, intraoperative factors, and pathologic findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15249403     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.139.7.718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  128 in total

Review 1.  Pancreatic surgery: evolution and current tailored approach.

Authors:  Mario Zovak; Dubravka Mužina Mišić; Goran Glavčić
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.293

2.  Is local resection adequate for T1 stage ampullary cancer?

Authors:  Albert Amini; John T Miura; Thejus T Jayakrishnan; Fabian M Johnston; Susan Tsai; Kathleen K Christians; T Clark Gamblin; Kiran K Turaga
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Incidence and outcome of biliary strictures after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Michael G House; John L Cameron; Richard D Schulick; Kurt A Campbell; Patricia K Sauter; Joann Coleman; Keith D Lillemoe; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Fast-track programmes for hepatopancreatic resections: where do we stand?

Authors:  Lidewij Spelt; Daniel Ansari; Christian Sturesson; Bobby Tingstedt; Roland Andersson
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Pancreatectomy risk calculator: an ACS-NSQIP resource.

Authors:  Purvi Parikh; Mira Shiloach; Mark E Cohen; Karl Y Bilimoria; Clifford Y Ko; Bruce L Hall; Henry A Pitt
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Pancreatoduodenectomy with or without early ligation of the inferior pancreatoduodenal artery: comparison of intraoperative blood loss and short-term outcome.

Authors:  Yoichi Ishizaki; Hiroyuki Sugo; Jiro Yoshimoto; Hiroshi Imamura; Seiji Kawasaki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Achieving good perioperative outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy in a low-volume setting: a 25-year experience.

Authors:  Aljamir D Chedid; Marcio F Chedid; Leonardo V Winkelmann; Tomaz J M Grezzana Filho; Cleber D P Kruel
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-04

8.  Tobacco Smoking Associated With Increased Anastomotic Disruption Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Noah S Rozich; Alessandra Landmann; Casey S Butler; Morgan M Bonds; Laura E Fischer; Russell G Postier; Katherine T Morris
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 2.192

9.  Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Risk factors, clinical predictors, and management (single center experience).

Authors:  Ayman El Nakeeb; Tarek Salah; Ahmad Sultan; Mohamed El Hemaly; Waleed Askr; Helmy Ezzat; Emad Hamdy; Ehab Atef; Ehab El Hanafy; Ahmed El-Geidie; Mohamed Abdel Wahab; Talaat Abdallah
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Redefining the R1 resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: tumour lymph nodal burden and lymph node ratio are the only prognostic factors associated with survival.

Authors:  Biku J John; Prashant Naik; Alastair Ironside; Brian R Davidson; Guiseppe Fusai; Roopinder Gillmore; Jennifer Watkins; Sakhawat H Rahman
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.