Literature DB >> 24362919

The adductor tubercle as an important landmark to determine the joint line level in total knee arthroplasty: from radiographs to surgical theatre.

F Iacono1, G F Raspugli, D Bruni, G Filardo, S Zaffagnini, W F Luetzow, M Lo Presti, I Akkawi, G M Marcheggiani Muccioli, M Marcacci.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The restoration of the normal joint line (JL) is important both in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the assessment of the femoro-tibial JL is still controversial. A strong correlation between femoral width (FW) and distance from adductor tubercle (AT) to JL was found on radiographs, with a ratio of 0.54. The hypothesis was that this ratio was applicable also in the surgical theatre by using measurements obtained intra-operatively with a caliper.
METHODS: Femoral width, AT to JL distance and the RATIO between AT to JL distance and FW of 40 patients who underwent TKA were measured on radiograph and intra-operatively. Bland-Altman agreement tests with repeated measurements and linear regression analysis were used. The ratio was used to estimate the distance between JL and AT.
RESULTS: The AT to JL distance/FW ratio calculated with linear regression resulted 0.54 for radiographic measurements and 0.53 for intra-operative measurements. There was no difference (0.009 ± 0.03) between the calculated ratios on radiographic and intra-operative measurements, and the correlation between intra-operative and radiographic measurements was 0.5 (p = 0.0016).
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the validity of the radiographic method which uses an AT to JL distance/FW ratio to determine the level of the JL is confirmed also when using intra-operatively acquired measurements. Thus, this ratio represents a reliable tool to determine the JL level even in challenging prosthetic revision cases when the anatomical JL is missing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series, Level IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24362919     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2809-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  18 in total

Review 1.  Revision total knee arthroplasty: current rationale and techniques for femoral component revision.

Authors:  D P Hoeffel; H E Rubash
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Restoring the joint line in revision TKA: does it matter?

Authors:  J Bellemans
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  The Posterior Condylar Offset Ratio.

Authors:  Parm Johal; Mohammed A Hassaballa; Jonathan D Eldridge; Andrew J Porteous
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Biomechanical effects of joint line elevation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Stefan Fornalski; Michelle H McGarry; Christopher N H Bui; William C Kim; Thay Q Lee
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Reliability of bony landmarks for restoration of the joint line in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Elvire Servien; Darius Viskontas; Bruno M Giuffrè; Myles R J Coolican; David A Parker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Joint line reconstruction in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: development and validation of a measurement method.

Authors:  Patrick Weber; Christian Schröder; Rüdiger Paul Laubender; Andrea Baur-Melnyk; Christoph von Schulze Pellengahr; Volkmar Jansson; Peter E Müller
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Joint line changes and outcomes in constrained versus unconstrained total knee arthroplasty for the type II valgus knee.

Authors:  Hee-Nee Pang; Seng-Jin Yeo; Hwei-Chi Chong; Pak-Lin Chin; Shi-Lu Chia; Ngai-Nung Lo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis.

Authors:  H E Figgie; V M Goldberg; K G Heiple; H S Moller; N H Gordon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Radiological study of the knee joint line position measured from the fibular head and proximal tibial landmarks.

Authors:  Eric Havet; Antoine Gabrion; Frederic Leiber-Wackenheim; Joël Vernois; Bruno Olory; Patrice Mertl
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 1.354

View more
  10 in total

1.  The adductor tubercle: an important landmark to determine the joint line level in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Francesco Iacono; Giovanni Francesco Raspugli; Giuseppe Filardo; Danilo Bruni; Stefano Zaffagnini; Simone Bignozzi; Mirco Lo Presti; Ibrahim Akkawi; Maria Pia Neri; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The adductor ratio: a new tool for joint line reconstruction in revision TKA.

Authors:  T Luyckx; L Beckers; W Colyn; H Vandenneucker; J Bellemans
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Joint line level in revision total knee replacement: assessment and functional results with an average of seven years follow-up.

Authors:  Arnaud Clavé; Goulven Le Henaff; Thomas Roger; Paul Maisongrosse; Christian Mabit; Frédéric Dubrana
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Is a "sulcus cut" technique effective for determining the level of distal femoral resection in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Shinichi Kuriyama; Katsufumi Hyakuna; Satoshi Inoue; Yasuyuki Tanaka; Yasuyuki Tamaki; Hiromu Ito; Shuichi Matsuda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  The reliability of adductor tubercle as an anatomical landmark for joint line restoration in revision knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Berardo Di Matteo; Daniele Altomare; Andrea Dorotei; Giovanni Francesco Raspugli; Tommaso Bonanzinga; Maurilio Marcacci; Elizaveta Kon; Francesco Iacono
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-01

6.  3D-surface scan based validated new measurement technique of femoral joint line reconstruction in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Lars-Rene Tuecking; Max Ettinger; Dennis Nebel; Bastian Welke; Michael Schwarze; Henning Windhagen; Peter Savov
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2021-02-25

7.  Joint line reestablishment in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mustafa Çınar Akça; Yavuz Akalın; Nazan Çevik; İsmail Gökhan Şahin; Özgür Avcı; Alpaslan Öztürk
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-09-14

8.  Correction of coronal alignment correlates with reconstruction of joint height in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  U Kuwashima; K Okazaki; Y Tashiro; H Mizu-Uchi; S Hamai; S Okamoto; K Murakami; Y Iwamoto
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.853

9.  Effect of Joint Line Elevation after Posterior-stabilized and Cruciate-retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty on Clinical Function and Kinematics.

Authors:  Song-Jie Ji; Yi-Xin Zhou; Xu Jiang; Zhi-Yuan Cheng; Guang-Zhi Wang; Hui Ding; Ming-Lei Yang; Zhong-Lin Zhu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 2.628

10.  Using anatomical landmarks to calculate the normal joint line position in Chinese people: an observational study.

Authors:  Aoyuan Fan; Tianyang Xu; Xifan Li; Lei Li; Lin Fan; Dong Yang; Guodong Li
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 2.359

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.