Literature DB >> 22682692

The Posterior Condylar Offset Ratio.

Parm Johal1, Mohammed A Hassaballa, Jonathan D Eldridge, Andrew J Porteous.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Posterior Condylar Offset is an area of interest in knee arthroplasty research and clinical outcome. The aim of the study is to define a quantifiable Posterior Condylar Offset Ratio, a normal value for this ratio and to confirm its reproducibility on pre-operative radiographs.
METHOD: We propose a new Posterior Condylar Offset Ratio which is defined as the maximal thickness of the posterior condyle projecting posteriorly to a straight line drawn as the extension of the posterior femoral shaft cortex, divided by the maximal thickness of the posterior condyle projecting posterior to a straight line drawn as the extension of the anterior femoral shaft cortex on a true lateral radiograph of the distal quarter of the femur. We have measured this on 100 true lateral radiographs (50 females, 50 males, and mean age 65 years).
RESULTS: The mean ratio was 0.44 (SD 0.02) and was shown to have good reproducibility (intra-observer error 0.899 and inter-observer error 0.882. The ratio was also very consistent between male and female patients (0.44 (SD 0.02) for the males and 0.45 (SD 0.02) for the females). Adjusting the ratio for reported posterior condyle articular cartilage thickness increased the ratio to 0.47 (SD 0.02).
CONCLUSION: We suggest our Posterior Condylar Offset Ratio is a useful tool to aid further research in this area of knee arthroplasty and propose a normal value of 0.44 on radiographs and 0.47 on post-operative knee arthroplasty radiographs.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22682692     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.03.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  14 in total

1.  The adductor tubercle as an important landmark to determine the joint line level in total knee arthroplasty: from radiographs to surgical theatre.

Authors:  F Iacono; G F Raspugli; D Bruni; G Filardo; S Zaffagnini; W F Luetzow; M Lo Presti; I Akkawi; G M Marcheggiani Muccioli; M Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  An in Vivo Simulation of Isometry of the Anterolateral Aspect of the Healthy Knee.

Authors:  Willem A Kernkamp; Samuel K Van de Velde; Tsung-Yuan Tsai; Ewoud R A van Arkel; Peter D Asnis; Rob G H H Nelissen; Robert F LaPrade; Bertram Zarins; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Changes in anteroposterior stability and proprioception after different types of knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Delphine Wautier; Emmanuel Thienpont
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Clinical and radiological analysis of a personalized total knee arthroplasty system design.

Authors:  Francesco Benazzo; Matteo Ghiara; Stefano Marco Paolo Rossi; Emma Pruneri; Vivek Tiwari; Simone Perelli
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Bony morphology of the knee and non-traumatic meniscal tears: is there a role for meniscal impingement?

Authors:  Nasir Khan; Patrick McMahon; Haron Obaid
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Gender differences in morphology exist in posterior condylar offsets of the knee in Korean population.

Authors:  Yong-Gon Koh; Ji-Hoon Nam; Hyun-Seok Chung; Ho-Joong Kim; Heoung-Jae Chun; Kyoung-Tak Kang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  A technique of predicting radiographic joint line and posterior femoral condylar offset of the knee.

Authors:  Nicholas D Clement; David F Hamilton; Richard Burnett
Journal:  Arthritis       Date:  2014-02-11

8.  Posterior condylar offset is an independent predictor of functional outcome after revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  N D Clement; D J MacDonald; D F Hamilton; R Burnett
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 5.853

9.  Comparison of Patellofemoral-Specific Clinical and Radiographic Results after Total Knee Arthroplasty Using a Patellofemoral Design-Modified Prosthesis and Its Predecessor.

Authors:  Sang Jun Song; Kang Il Kim; Dong Uk Suh; Cheol Hee Park
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-02-02

10.  Robotic-arm assisted medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty versus jig-based unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with navigation control: study protocol for a prospective randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Babar Kayani; Sujith Konan; Jenni Tahmassebi; Atif Ayuob; Peter D Moriarty; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.