Literature DB >> 18046537

Reliability of bony landmarks for restoration of the joint line in revision knee arthroplasty.

Elvire Servien1, Darius Viskontas, Bruno M Giuffrè, Myles R J Coolican, David A Parker.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the reliability of bone landmarks for restoring the joint line in revision knee arthroplasty. The relationship of the femoral epicondyles, the tibial tubercle (TT) and the fibular head (FH) to the joint line was measured on 200 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, 100 females, 100 males), including assessment on intraobserver and interobserver reliability. MRI scans demonstrating chondral lesions and osteoarthritis were excluded, as were patients with immature skeletons or a history of previous knee surgery. Sequences in sagittal, coronal and axial planes were used as well as cross-referencing with the same computer software. In order to account for size differences between patients, each bony landmark measurement was converted to a ratio relative to the femoral or/and tibial width. We found a transepicondylar axis equal to 3.11 degrees (+/-1.9). The average distance from the epicondyles to the joint line was respectively 23 mm on the lateral side and 28 mm on the medial side. However there was a variation of distance from the epicondyles of the joint line up to 11 mm and a significative difference was found between male and female. We determined the distances from the tip of the FH and from the TT to the joint line. The joint line-FH distance averaged 14 mm (range 4.1-22.13) with no gender difference. The joint line-TT distance was averaged 22 mm (range 10.61-32.09). We determined an epicondylar ratio (distance from the lateral epicondyle to the joint line related to the femoral width). We found this ratio averaged 28% with no gender difference (P = 0.09). There is a large variation of bony landmarks depending on the size of the individual. Considering this findings, the FH is not a reliable guide for the joint line in revision surgery. Previous studies have measured the absolute values from various landmarks to the joint line. This study provides a significant advantage, in that the level of the joint line can be determined for each individual by using a ratio to account for gender and size differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18046537     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-007-0449-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  10 in total

1.  Anatomy of the epicondyles of the distal femur: MRI analysis of normal knees.

Authors:  F M Griffin; K Math; G R Scuderi; J N Insall; P L Poilvache
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Joint line restoration after revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  P F Partington; J Sawhney; C H Rorabeck; R L Barrack; J Moore
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Patellar tendon length--the factor in patellar instability?

Authors:  Ph Neyret; A H N Robinson; B Le Coultre; C Lapra; P Chambat
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Interindividual reproducibility in perioperative rotational alignment of femoral components in knee prosthetic surgery using the transepicondylar axis.

Authors:  J Jerosch; E Peuker; B Philipps; T Filler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2002-02-05       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Joint line position restoration during revision total knee replacement.

Authors:  Richard S Laskin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The proximal tibiofibular joint: an anatomic study.

Authors:  Murat Bozkurt; Erkan Yilmaz; Doğan Atlihan; Ibrahim Tekdemir; Hasan Havitçioğlu; Izge Günal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Restoring the joint line in revision TKA: does it matter?

Authors:  J Bellemans
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Morphology of the transepicondylar axis and its application in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J B Stiehl; B D Abbott
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis.

Authors:  H E Figgie; V M Goldberg; K G Heiple; H S Moller; N H Gordon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  The use of the knee joint-line balancer to control patella position in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Arno M ten Ham; Ate B Wymenga; Wilco C H Jacobs
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.199

  10 in total
  33 in total

1.  The adductor tubercle: a reliable landmark for analysing the level of the femorotibial joint line.

Authors:  Francesco Iacono; Mirco Lo Presti; Danilo Bruni; Giovanni Francesco Raspugli; Simone Bignozzi; Bharat Sharma; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Comparison between two computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: gap-balancing versus measured resection technique.

Authors:  Domenico Tigani; G Sabbioni; R Ben Ayad; M Filanti; N Rani; N Del Piccolo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The intercondylar notch ceiling: an accurate reference for distal femoral resection in total knee arthroplasty for severely degenerated varus knees.

Authors:  Bing Yue; Jun Wang; You Wang; Mengning Yan; Jun Zhang; Yiming Zeng
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Anthropometric difference of the knee on MRI according to gender and age groups.

Authors:  Hyuksoo Han; Sohee Oh; Chong Bum Chang; Seung-Baik Kang
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Impaction bone grafting for the reconstruction of large bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  M Rudert; B M Holzapfel; E von Rottkay; D E Holzapfel; U Noeth
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 1.154

6.  The adductor tubercle as an important landmark to determine the joint line level in total knee arthroplasty: from radiographs to surgical theatre.

Authors:  F Iacono; G F Raspugli; D Bruni; G Filardo; S Zaffagnini; W F Luetzow; M Lo Presti; I Akkawi; G M Marcheggiani Muccioli; M Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Gap balancing versus measured resection technique using a mobile-bearing prosthesis in computer-assisted surgery.

Authors:  G Sabbioni; N Rani; N Del Piccolo; R Ben Ayad; C Carubbi; D Tigani
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2011-03-05

8.  All-polyethylene tibial components are not inferior to metal-backed tibial components in long-term follow-up of knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Mustafa Yassin; Avraham Garti; Moshe Weissbrot; Uzi Ashkenazi; Muhammed Khatib; Dror Robinson
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-05-26

9.  The adductor tubercle: an important landmark to determine the joint line level in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Francesco Iacono; Giovanni Francesco Raspugli; Giuseppe Filardo; Danilo Bruni; Stefano Zaffagnini; Simone Bignozzi; Mirco Lo Presti; Ibrahim Akkawi; Maria Pia Neri; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Assessing joint line positions by means of the contralateral knee: a new approach for planning knee revision surgery?

Authors:  Günther Maderbacher; Armin Keshmiri; Florian Zeman; Joachim Grifka; Clemens Baier
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.