Literature DB >> 17440678

Radiological study of the knee joint line position measured from the fibular head and proximal tibial landmarks.

Eric Havet1, Antoine Gabrion, Frederic Leiber-Wackenheim, Joël Vernois, Bruno Olory, Patrice Mertl.   

Abstract

Restoring the joint line level is one of the surgical challenges during revision of total knee arthroplasty. The position of the tibial surface is commonly estimated by its distance to the apex of fibular head, but no study evaluating this distance accurately has been published yet. The purpose of this work was to study the distance between the knee joint line and the apex of the fibular head and the proximal tibia, particularly the tibial tuberosity. Variability with clinical data and relations with other local measurements have been evaluated on knee radiographs (an antero-posterior view, a medio-lateral view and an anteroposterior full length view) of 100 subjects (125 knees). Results showed no correlation between the joint line-fibular head apex distance and any clinical data of the patients, or any other performed measurements. Relations between tibial measurements and the sexe or the height of the subjects were noted. Besides, the review of the 25 bilateral cases did not show statistically significant side difference but the descriptive analysis showed too large discrepancies for the joint line-fibular head apex distance to be used as a landmark. We conclude that the fibular head apex cannot be used as a morphologic landmark to determine the knee joint line position. Its interest in clinical and surgical practice must be discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17440678     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-007-0207-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.354


  13 in total

1.  Joint line restoration after revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  P F Partington; J Sawhney; C H Rorabeck; R L Barrack; J Moore
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Knee morphology as a guide to knee replacement.

Authors:  J S Mensch; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Morphology of the transepicondylar axis and its application in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J B Stiehl; B D Abbott
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis.

Authors:  H E Figgie; V M Goldberg; K G Heiple; H S Moller; N H Gordon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Tibial anatomy and functional axes.

Authors:  Y Yoshioka; D W Siu; R A Scudamore; T D Cooke
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  [The median functional slope of the tibia. Principle. Technique of measurement. Value. Interest].

Authors:  R Julliard; P Genin; G Weil; P Palmkrantz
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1993

7.  Dimensions of the knee. Radiographic and autopsy study of sizes required by a knee prosthesis.

Authors:  B B Seedhom; E B Longton; V Wright; D Dowson
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Tibial plateau-fibular head distance of normal Japanese knees measured in lateral view of roentgenogram.

Authors:  S Rojanasthien; R Okamoto; N Ozawa; T Koshino
Journal:  Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  1989-11

9.  Distal femur morphometry: a gender and bilateral comparative study using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Khalil Awadh Murshed; Aynur Emine Ciçekcibaşi; Aydin Karabacakoğlu; Muzaffer Seker; Taner Ziylan
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 1.246

10.  Implications of reference axes used for rotational alignment of the femoral component in primary and revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J P Mantas; R D Bloebaum; J G Skedros; A A Hofmann
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  13 in total

1.  The adductor tubercle: a reliable landmark for analysing the level of the femorotibial joint line.

Authors:  Francesco Iacono; Mirco Lo Presti; Danilo Bruni; Giovanni Francesco Raspugli; Simone Bignozzi; Bharat Sharma; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The adductor tubercle as an important landmark to determine the joint line level in total knee arthroplasty: from radiographs to surgical theatre.

Authors:  F Iacono; G F Raspugli; D Bruni; G Filardo; S Zaffagnini; W F Luetzow; M Lo Presti; I Akkawi; G M Marcheggiani Muccioli; M Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The adductor ratio: a new tool for joint line reconstruction in revision TKA.

Authors:  T Luyckx; L Beckers; W Colyn; H Vandenneucker; J Bellemans
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Accuracy of bony landmarks for restoring the natural joint line in revision knee surgery: an MRI study.

Authors:  Günther Maderbacher; Armin Keshmiri; Jens Schaumburger; Hans-Robert Springorum; Florian Zeman; Joachim Grifka; Clemens Baier
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Assessing joint line positions by means of the contralateral knee: a new approach for planning knee revision surgery?

Authors:  Günther Maderbacher; Armin Keshmiri; Florian Zeman; Joachim Grifka; Clemens Baier
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Joint line level in revision total knee replacement: assessment and functional results with an average of seven years follow-up.

Authors:  Arnaud Clavé; Goulven Le Henaff; Thomas Roger; Paul Maisongrosse; Christian Mabit; Frédéric Dubrana
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Joint line and patellar height restoration after revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jong-Keun Seon; Eun-Kyoo Song
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  Comment on: Measurement of the knee joint line in Turkish population.

Authors:  Harun R Gungor; Nusret Ok; Kadir Agladioglu
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 1.511

9.  Is there a difference in joint line restoration in revision Total knee arthroplasty according to prosthesis type?

Authors:  JuHong Lee; SungIl Wang; KiBum Kim
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Using anatomical landmarks to calculate the normal joint line position in Chinese people: an observational study.

Authors:  Aoyuan Fan; Tianyang Xu; Xifan Li; Lei Li; Lin Fan; Dong Yang; Guodong Li
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.