Literature DB >> 16943630

No-reference image quality metrics for structural MRI.

Jeffrey P Woodard1, Monica P Carley-Spencer.   

Abstract

Neuroimagery must be visually checked for unacceptable levels of distortion prior to processing. However, inspection is time-consuming, unreliable for detecting subtle distortions and often subjective. With the increasing volume of neuroimagery, objective measures of quality are needed in order to automate screening. To address this need, we have assessed the effectiveness of no-reference image quality measures, which quantify quality inherent to a single image. A data set of 1001 magnetic resonance images (MRIs) recorded from 143 subjects was used for this evaluation. The MRI images were artificially distorted with two levels of either additive Gaussian noise or intensity nonuniformity created from a linear model. A total of 239 different quality measures were defined from seven overall families and used to discriminate images for the type and level of distortion. Analysis of Variance identified two families of quality measure that were most effective: one based on Natural Scene Statistics and one originally developed to measure distortion caused by image compression. Measures from both families reliably discriminated among undistorted images, noisy images, and images distorted by intensity nonuniformity. The best quality measures were sensitive only to the distortion category and were not significantly affected by other factors. The results are encouraging enough that several quality measures are being incorporated in a real world MRI test bed.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16943630     DOI: 10.1385/NI:4:3:243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroinformatics        ISSN: 1539-2791


  6 in total

1.  MRI simulation-based evaluation of image-processing and classification methods.

Authors:  R K Kwan; A C Evans; G B Pike
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Multiresolution histograms and their use for recognition.

Authors:  Efstathios Hadjidemetriou; Michael D Grossberg; Shree K Nayar
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.226

3.  Design and construction of a realistic digital brain phantom.

Authors:  D L Collins; A P Zijdenbos; V Kollokian; J G Sled; N J Kabani; C J Holmes; A C Evans
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Standing-wave and RF penetration artifacts caused by elliptic geometry: an electrodynamic analysis of MRI.

Authors:  J G Sled; G B Pike
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data.

Authors:  J G Sled; A P Zijdenbos; A C Evans
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized Talairach space.

Authors:  D L Collins; P Neelin; T M Peters; A C Evans
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

  6 in total
  20 in total

1.  Automated image quality evaluation of structural brain MRI using an ensemble of deep learning networks.

Authors:  Sheeba J Sujit; Ivan Coronado; Arash Kamali; Ponnada A Narayana; Refaat E Gabr
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Technical Note: MRQy - An open-source tool for quality control of MR imaging data.

Authors:  Amir Reza Sadri; Andrew Janowczyk; Ren Zhou; Ruchika Verma; Niha Beig; Jacob Antunes; Anant Madabhushi; Pallavi Tiwari; Satish E Viswanath
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Bayesian framework inspired no-reference region-of-interest quality measure for brain MRI images.

Authors:  Michael Osadebey; Marius Pedersen; Douglas Arnold; Katrina Wendel-Mitoraj
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-06-13

4.  Automating PACS Quality Control with the Vanderbilt Image Processing Enterprise Resource.

Authors:  Michael L Esparza; E Brian Welch; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2012-02-12

5.  Automated reference-free detection of motion artifacts in magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Thomas Küstner; Annika Liebgott; Lukas Mauch; Petros Martirosian; Fabian Bamberg; Konstantin Nikolaou; Bin Yang; Fritz Schick; Sergios Gatidis
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  DIAGNOSTIC IMAGE QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND CLASSIFICATION IN MEDICAL IMAGING: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Ma; Ukash Nakarmi; Cedric Yue Sik Kin; Christopher M Sandino; Joseph Y Cheng; Ali B Syed; Peter Wei; John M Pauly; Shreyas S Vasanawala
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging       Date:  2020-05-22

7.  Modeling Human Perception of Image Quality.

Authors:  Oleg S Pianykh; Ksenia Pospelova; Nick H Kamboj
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Automatic quality assessment in structural brain magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Bénédicte Mortamet; Matt A Bernstein; Clifford R Jack; Jeffrey L Gunter; Chadwick Ward; Paula J Britson; Reto Meuli; Jean-Philippe Thiran; Gunnar Krueger
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Image Quality Evaluation in Clinical Research: A Case Study on Brain and Cardiac MRI Images in Multi-Center Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Michael Osadebey; Marius Pedersen; Douglas Arnold; Katrina Wendel-Mitoraj
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.316

Review 10.  TAPAS: An Open-Source Software Package for Translational Neuromodeling and Computational Psychiatry.

Authors:  Stefan Frässle; Eduardo A Aponte; Saskia Bollmann; Kay H Brodersen; Cao T Do; Olivia K Harrison; Samuel J Harrison; Jakob Heinzle; Sandra Iglesias; Lars Kasper; Ekaterina I Lomakina; Christoph Mathys; Matthias Müller-Schrader; Inês Pereira; Frederike H Petzschner; Sudhir Raman; Dario Schöbi; Birte Toussaint; Lilian A Weber; Yu Yao; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.