Literature DB >> 17599306

A comparison of vancomycin and metronidazole for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea, stratified by disease severity.

Fred A Zar1, Srinivasa R Bakkanagari, K M L S T Moorthi, Melinda B Davis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence and severity of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) has been increasing, and there have been recent reports of metronidazole treatment failure. Metronidazole is still commonly used as first-line treatment for CDAD but has never been compared with vancomycin in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. We conducted such a trial, stratifying patients according to disease severity, to investigate whether one agent was superior for treating either mild or severe disease.
METHODS: From October 1994 through June 2002, patients with CDAD were stratified according to whether they had mild or severe disease based on clinical criteria and were randomly assigned to receive oral metronidazole (250 mg 4 times per day) or oral vancomycin (125 mg 4 times per day) for 10 days. Both groups received an oral placebo in addition to the study drug. Patients were followed up for 21 days to assess cure, treatment failure, relapse, or intolerance.
RESULTS: One hundred seventy-two patients were enrolled, and 150 of these patients successfully completed the trial. Among the patients with mild CDAD, treatment with metronidazole or vancomycin resulted in clinical cure in 90% and 98% of the patients, respectively (P=.36). Among the patients with severe CDAD, treatment with metronidazole or vancomycin resulted in clinical cure in 76% and 97% of the patients, respectively (P=.02). Clinical symptoms recurred in 15% of the patients treated with metronidazole and 14% of those treated with vancomycin.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that metronidazole and vancomycin are equally effective for the treatment of mild CDAD, but vancomycin is superior for treating patients with severe CDAD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17599306     DOI: 10.1086/519265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  370 in total

Review 1.  [Coronary heart disease and its differential treatment].

Authors:  M Diewitz
Journal:  Med Welt       Date:  1975-10-24

Review 2.  Clostridium difficile infection: update on emerging antibiotic treatment options and antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  Dhara Shah; Minh-Duc Dang; Rodrigo Hasbun; Hoonmo L Koo; Zhi-Dong Jiang; Herbert L DuPont; Kevin W Garey
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 3.  Review of medical and surgical management of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  B Faris; A Blackmore; N Haboubi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 4.  Intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection: a review.

Authors:  Marwan S Abougergi; John H Kwon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  Clostridium difficile in the ICU: the struggle continues.

Authors:  Linda D Bobo; Erik R Dubberke; Marin Kollef
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  [Nosocomial diarrhea].

Authors:  S Weis; M Grimm
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 0.743

7.  Prospective observational study comparing three different treatment regimes in patients with Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Judith M Wenisch; Daniela Schmid; Hung-Wei Kuo; Franz Allerberger; Verena Michl; Philip Tesik; Gerhard Tucek; Hermann Laferl; Christoph Wenisch
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Clostridium difficile infection: management strategies for a difficult disease.

Authors:  Sahil Khanna; Darrell S Pardi
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.409

Review 9.  Fidaxomicin in Clostridium difficile infection: latest evidence and clinical guidance.

Authors:  Kathleen Mullane
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.091

10.  Derivation and Validation of a Clostridium difficile Infection Recurrence Prediction Rule in a National Cohort of Veterans.

Authors:  Kelly R Reveles; Eric M Mortensen; Jim M Koeller; Kenneth A Lawson; Mary Jo V Pugh; Sarah A Rumbellow; Jacqueline R Argamany; Christopher R Frei
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 4.705

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.