P Daniel Patterson1, Anthony J Pfeiffer1, Judith R Lave2, Matthew D Weaver1, Kaleab Abebe3, David Krackhardt4, Robert M Arnold5, Donald M Yealy1. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. 2. Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. 3. Department of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. 4. David A Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. 5. Division of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Lack of familiarity between teammates is linked to worsened safety in high risk settings. The emergency department (ED) is a high risk healthcare setting where unfamiliar teams are created by diversity in clinician shift schedules and flexibility in clinician movement across the department. We sought to characterise familiarity between clinician teammates in one urban teaching hospital ED over a 22 week study period. METHODS: We used a retrospective study design of shift scheduling data to calculate the mean weekly hours of familiarity between teammates at the dyadic level, and the proportion of clinicians with a minimum of 2, 5, 10 and 20 h of familiarity at any given hour during the study period. RESULTS: Mean weekly hours of familiarity between ED clinician dyads was 2 h (SD 1.5). At any given hour over the study period, the proportions of clinicians with a minimum of 2, 5, 10 and 20 h of familiarity were 80%, 51%, 27% and 0.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, few clinicians could be described as having a high level of familiarity with teammates. The limited familiarity between ED clinicians identified in this study may be a natural feature of ED care delivery in academic settings. We provide a template for measurement of ED team familiarity. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
OBJECTIVES: Lack of familiarity between teammates is linked to worsened safety in high risk settings. The emergency department (ED) is a high risk healthcare setting where unfamiliar teams are created by diversity in clinician shift schedules and flexibility in clinician movement across the department. We sought to characterise familiarity between clinician teammates in one urban teaching hospital ED over a 22 week study period. METHODS: We used a retrospective study design of shift scheduling data to calculate the mean weekly hours of familiarity between teammates at the dyadic level, and the proportion of clinicians with a minimum of 2, 5, 10 and 20 h of familiarity at any given hour during the study period. RESULTS: Mean weekly hours of familiarity between ED clinician dyads was 2 h (SD 1.5). At any given hour over the study period, the proportions of clinicians with a minimum of 2, 5, 10 and 20 h of familiarity were 80%, 51%, 27% and 0.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, few clinicians could be described as having a high level of familiarity with teammates. The limited familiarity between ED clinicians identified in this study may be a natural feature of ED care delivery in academic settings. We provide a template for measurement of ED team familiarity. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Authors: John C Morey; Robert Simon; Gregory D Jay; Robert L Wears; Mary Salisbury; Kimberly A Dukes; Scott D Berns Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Eduardo Salas; Deborah DiazGranados; Cameron Klein; C Shawn Burke; Kevin C Stagl; Gerald F Goodwin; Stanley M Halpin Journal: Hum Factors Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 2.888
Authors: Eric J Thomas; Amber L Williams; Eric F Reichman; Robert E Lasky; Sharon Crandell; William R Taggart Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-02-15 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: P Daniel Patterson; Robert M Arnold; Kaleab Abebe; Judith R Lave; David Krackhardt; Matthew Carr; Matthew D Weaver; Donald M Yealy Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2011-02-09 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Karen Mazzocco; Diana B Petitti; Kenneth T Fong; Doug Bonacum; John Brookey; Suzanne Graham; Robert E Lasky; J Bryan Sexton; Eric J Thomas Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2008-09-11 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Fabian Stroben; Therese Schröder; Katja A Dannenberg; Anke Thomas; Aristomenis Exadaktylos; Wolf E Hautz Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2016-07-15 Impact factor: 2.463