INTRODUCTION: Poor teamwork and communication between healthcare staff are correlated to patient safety incidents. However, the organisational factors responsible for these issues are unexplored. Root cause analyses (RCA) use human factors thinking to analyse the systems behind severe patient safety incidents. The objective of this study is to review RCA reports (RCAR) for characteristics of verbal communication errors between hospital staff in an organisational perspective. METHOD: Two independent raters analysed 84 RCARs, conducted in six Danish hospitals between 2004 and 2006, for descriptions and characteristics of verbal communication errors such as handover errors and error during teamwork. RESULTS: Raters found description of verbal communication errors in 44 reports (52%). These included handover errors (35 (86%)), communication errors between different staff groups (19 (43%)), misunderstandings (13 (30%)), communication errors between junior and senior staff members (11 (25%)), hesitance in speaking up (10 (23%)) and communication errors during teamwork (8 (18%)). The kappa values were 0.44-0.78. Unproceduralized communication and information exchange via telephone, related to transfer between units and consults from other specialties, were particularly vulnerable processes. CONCLUSION: With the risk of bias in mind, it is concluded that more than half of the RCARs described erroneous verbal communication between staff members as root causes of or contributing factors of severe patient safety incidents. The RCARs rich descriptions of the incidents revealed the organisational factors and needs related to these errors.
INTRODUCTION: Poor teamwork and communication between healthcare staff are correlated to patient safety incidents. However, the organisational factors responsible for these issues are unexplored. Root cause analyses (RCA) use human factors thinking to analyse the systems behind severe patient safety incidents. The objective of this study is to review RCA reports (RCAR) for characteristics of verbal communication errors between hospital staff in an organisational perspective. METHOD: Two independent raters analysed 84 RCARs, conducted in six Danish hospitals between 2004 and 2006, for descriptions and characteristics of verbal communication errors such as handover errors and error during teamwork. RESULTS: Raters found description of verbal communication errors in 44 reports (52%). These included handover errors (35 (86%)), communication errors between different staff groups (19 (43%)), misunderstandings (13 (30%)), communication errors between junior and senior staff members (11 (25%)), hesitance in speaking up (10 (23%)) and communication errors during teamwork (8 (18%)). The kappa values were 0.44-0.78. Unproceduralized communication and information exchange via telephone, related to transfer between units and consults from other specialties, were particularly vulnerable processes. CONCLUSION: With the risk of bias in mind, it is concluded that more than half of the RCARs described erroneous verbal communication between staff members as root causes of or contributing factors of severe patient safety incidents. The RCARs rich descriptions of the incidents revealed the organisational factors and needs related to these errors.
Authors: P Daniel Patterson; Anthony J Pfeiffer; Judith R Lave; Matthew D Weaver; Kaleab Abebe; David Krackhardt; Robert M Arnold; Donald M Yealy Journal: Emerg Med J Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: P Daniel Patterson; Matthew D Weaver; Sallie J Weaver; Michael A Rosen; Gergana Todorova; Laurie R Weingart; David Krackhardt; Judith R Lave; Robert M Arnold; Donald M Yealy; Eduardo Salas Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2012 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: P Daniel Patterson; Matthew D Weaver; Douglas P Landsittel; David Krackhardt; David Hostler; John E Vena; Ashley M Hughes; Eduardo Salas; Donald M Yealy Journal: Emerg Med J Date: 2015-11-27 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: John D Blakey; Debbie Guy; Carl Simpson; Andrew Fearn; Sharon Cannaby; Petra Wilson; Dominick Shaw Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2012-03-29 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: P Daniel Patterson; Anthony J Pfeiffer; Matthew D Weaver; David Krackhardt; Robert M Arnold; Donald M Yealy; Judith R Lave Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2013-03-22 Impact factor: 2.655