OBJECTIVE: The present study investigated factors that explain when and why different groups of teammates are more likely to request and accept backup from one another when needed in an environment characterized by extreme time pressure and severe consequences of error: commercial air traffic control (ATC). BACKGROUND: Transactive memory theory states that teammates develop consensus regarding the distribution of their relative expertise as well as confidence in that expertise over time and that this facilitates coordination processes. The present study investigated whether this theory could help to explain between-team differences in requesting and accepting backup when needed. METHOD: The present study used cross-sectional data collected from 51 commercial ATC teams. Hypotheses were tested using multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: Teammates with greater experience working together requested and accepted backup from one another more than those with lesser experience working together. Teammate knowledge consensus and perceived team efficacy appear to have mediated this relationship. CONCLUSION: Transactive memory theory extends to high-stress environments in which members' expertise is highly overlapping. Teammates' shared mental models about one another increase the likelihood that they will request and accept backup. APPLICATION: Teammate familiarity should be considered when choosing among potential replacement team members. Training strategies that accelerate the development of teammate knowledge consensus and team efficacy are warranted.
OBJECTIVE: The present study investigated factors that explain when and why different groups of teammates are more likely to request and accept backup from one another when needed in an environment characterized by extreme time pressure and severe consequences of error: commercial air traffic control (ATC). BACKGROUND: Transactive memory theory states that teammates develop consensus regarding the distribution of their relative expertise as well as confidence in that expertise over time and that this facilitates coordination processes. The present study investigated whether this theory could help to explain between-team differences in requesting and accepting backup when needed. METHOD: The present study used cross-sectional data collected from 51 commercial ATC teams. Hypotheses were tested using multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: Teammates with greater experience working together requested and accepted backup from one another more than those with lesser experience working together. Teammate knowledge consensus and perceived team efficacy appear to have mediated this relationship. CONCLUSION: Transactive memory theory extends to high-stress environments in which members' expertise is highly overlapping. Teammates' shared mental models about one another increase the likelihood that they will request and accept backup. APPLICATION: Teammate familiarity should be considered when choosing among potential replacement team members. Training strategies that accelerate the development of teammate knowledge consensus and team efficacy are warranted.
Authors: P Daniel Patterson; Anthony J Pfeiffer; Judith R Lave; Matthew D Weaver; Kaleab Abebe; David Krackhardt; Robert M Arnold; Donald M Yealy Journal: Emerg Med J Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Jordan Everson; Russell J Funk; Samuel R Kaufman; Jason Owen-Smith; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Francis D Pagani; John M Hollingsworth Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2017-05-04 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Matthew D Weaver; P Daniel Patterson; Anthony Fabio; Charity G Moore; Matthew S Freiberg; Thomas J Songer Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2015-09-14 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: P Daniel Patterson; Matthew D Weaver; Sallie J Weaver; Michael A Rosen; Gergana Todorova; Laurie R Weingart; David Krackhardt; Judith R Lave; Robert M Arnold; Donald M Yealy; Eduardo Salas Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2012 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: P Daniel Patterson; Robert M Arnold; Kaleab Abebe; Judith R Lave; David Krackhardt; Matthew Carr; Matthew D Weaver; Donald M Yealy Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2011-02-09 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Yan Xiao; Alan Jones; Beilei Belinda Zhang; Monica Bennett; Simon C Mears; Jay D Mabrey; Donald Kennerly Journal: World J Surg Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Inge E M Hendrikx; Stef C G Vermeulen; Vera L W Wientjens; Remco S Mannak Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-07 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: P Daniel Patterson; Matthew D Weaver; Douglas P Landsittel; David Krackhardt; David Hostler; John E Vena; Ashley M Hughes; Eduardo Salas; Donald M Yealy Journal: Emerg Med J Date: 2015-11-27 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: P Daniel Patterson; Anthony J Pfeiffer; Matthew D Weaver; David Krackhardt; Robert M Arnold; Donald M Yealy; Judith R Lave Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2013-03-22 Impact factor: 2.655