Literature DB >> 20156896

Team training in the neonatal resuscitation program for interns: teamwork and quality of resuscitations.

Eric J Thomas1, Amber L Williams, Eric F Reichman, Robert E Lasky, Sharon Crandell, William R Taggart.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Poor communication and teamwork may contribute to errors during neonatal resuscitation. Our objective was to evaluate whether interns who received a 2-hour teamwork training intervention with the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) demonstrated more teamwork and higher quality resuscitations than control subjects.
METHODS: Participants were noncertified 2007 and 2008 incoming interns for pediatrics, combined pediatrics and internal medicine, family medicine, emergency medicine, and obstetrics and gynecology (n = 98). Pediatrics and combined pediatrics/internal medicine interns were eligible for 6-month follow-up (n = 34). A randomized trial was conducted in which half of the participants in the team training arm practiced NRP skills by using high-fidelity simulators; the remaining practiced with low-fidelity simulators, as did control subjects. Blinded, trained observers viewed video recordings of high-fidelity-simulated resuscitations for teamwork and resuscitation quality.
RESULTS: High-fidelity training (HFT) group had higher teamwork frequency than did control subjects (12.8 vs 9.0 behaviors per minute; P < .001). Intervention groups maintained more workload management (control subjects: 89.3%; low-fidelity training [LFT] group: 98.0% [P < .001]; HFT group: 98.8%; HFT group versus control subjects [P < .001]) and completed resuscitations faster (control subjects: 10.6 minutes; LFT group: 8.6 minutes [P = .040]; HFT group: 7.4 minutes; HFT group versus control subjects [P < .001]). Overall, intervention teams completed the resuscitation an average of 2.6 minutes faster than did control subjects, a time reduction of 24% (95% confidence interval: 12%-37%). Intervention groups demonstrated more frequent teamwork during 6-month follow-up resuscitations (11.8 vs 10.0 behaviors per minute; P = .030).
CONCLUSIONS: Trained participants exhibited more frequent teamwork behaviors (especially the HFT group) and better workload management and completed the resuscitation more quickly than did control subjects. The impact on team behaviors persisted for at least 6 months. Incorporating team training into the NRP curriculum is a feasible and effective way to teach interns teamwork skills. It also improves simulated resuscitation quality by shortening the duration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20156896     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2009-1635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  37 in total

1.  Outcome of extremely low birth weight infants who received delivery room cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Myra H Wyckoff; Walid A Salhab; Roy J Heyne; Douglas E Kendrick; Barbara J Stoll; Abbot R Laptook
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  Impact of an embedded simulation team training programme in a paediatric intensive care unit: a prospective, single-centre, longitudinal study.

Authors:  Martin Stocker; Meredith Allen; Natasha Pool; Kumi De Costa; Julie Combes; Neil West; Margarita Burmester
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Context in Quality of Care: Improving Teamwork and Resilience.

Authors:  Daniel S Tawfik; John Bryan Sexton; Kathryn C Adair; Heather C Kaplan; Jochen Profit
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 3.430

4.  Correlations between technical skills and behavioral skills in simulated neonatal resuscitations.

Authors:  T Sawyer; D Leonard; A Sierocka-Castaneda; D Chan; M Thompson
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  Does simulation booster impact retention of resuscitation procedural skills and teamwork?

Authors:  J Bender; K Kennally; R Shields; F Overly
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 2.521

6.  How familiar are clinician teammates in the emergency department?

Authors:  P Daniel Patterson; Anthony J Pfeiffer; Judith R Lave; Matthew D Weaver; Kaleab Abebe; David Krackhardt; Robert M Arnold; Donald M Yealy
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Rethinking resident supervision to improve safety: from hierarchical to interprofessional models.

Authors:  Michal Tamuz; Traber Davis Giardina; Eric J Thomas; Shailaja Menon; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.960

8.  Teammate familiarity and risk of injury in emergency medical services.

Authors:  P Daniel Patterson; Matthew D Weaver; Douglas P Landsittel; David Krackhardt; David Hostler; John E Vena; Ashley M Hughes; Eduardo Salas; Donald M Yealy
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  The emergency medical services safety champions.

Authors:  P Daniel Patterson; Michelle S Anderson; Nancy D Zionts; Paul M Paris
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 1.852

10.  Speaking up and sharing information improves trainee neonatal resuscitations.

Authors:  Lakshmi I Katakam; Amber W Trickey; Eric J Thomas
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.844

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.