Literature DB >> 11468609

Work interrupted: a comparison of workplace interruptions in emergency departments and primary care offices.

C D Chisholm1, A M Dornfeld, D R Nelson, W H Cordell.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the number of interruptions and to characterize tasks performed in emergency departments compared with those performed in primary care offices.
METHODS: We conducted an observational time-motion, task-analysis study in 5 nonteaching community hospitals and 22 primary care offices in 5 central Indiana cities. Twenty-two emergency physicians and 22 office-based primary care physicians (PCPs) were observed at work. The number of interruptions, tasks, simultaneous tasks, and patients concurrently managed were recorded in 1-minute increments during 150- to 210-minute observation periods.
RESULTS: Emergency physicians were interrupted an average of 9.7 times per hour compared with 3.9 times per hour for PCPs, for an average difference of 5.8 times per hour (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.2 to 7.4). PCPs spent an average of 11.4 minutes per hour performing simultaneous tasks compared with 6.4 minutes per hour for emergency physicians (average difference, 5.0 minutes; 95% CI 1.2 to 8.8). Emergency physicians spent an average of 37.5 minutes per hour managing 3 or more patients concurrently compared with 0.9 minutes per hour for PCPs. PCPs spent significantly more time performing direct patient care, and emergency physicians spent significantly more time in analyzing data, charting, and taking reports on patients.
CONCLUSION: Emergency physicians experienced more interruptions and managed more patients concurrently than PCPs. PCPs spent more time performing simultaneous tasks than emergency physicians. Our study suggests there are important ergonomic differences between emergency medicine and office-based primary care work environments that may require different training approaches, design considerations, and coping strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11468609     DOI: 10.1067/mem.2001.115440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  66 in total

Review 1.  Learning from accident and error: avoiding the hazards of workload, stress, and routine interruptions in the emergency department.

Authors:  J Bradley Morrison; Jenny W Rudolph
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  [Not Available].

Authors:  Estelle Huet; Tony Leroux; Jean-François Bussières
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2011-07

3.  Towards a hybrid method to categorize interruptions and activities in healthcare.

Authors:  Juliana J Brixey; David J Robinson; Craig W Johnson; Todd R Johnson; James P Turley; Vimla L Patel; Jiajie Zhang
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 4.046

4.  Supporting patient care in the emergency department with a computerized whiteboard system.

Authors:  Dominik Aronsky; Ian Jones; Kevin Lanaghan; Corey M Slovis
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Timecourse of recovery from task interruption: data and a model.

Authors:  Erik M Altmann; J Gregory Trafton
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-12

6.  Beyond paging: building a web-based communication tool for nurses and physicians.

Authors:  Kenneth A Locke; Barbara Duffey-Rosenstein; Giancarlo De Lio; Dante Morra; Nicolas Hariton
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Seven Guiding Commitments: Making the U.S. Healthcare System More Compassionate.

Authors:  Beth A Lown
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2014-11-01

8.  Hospital paediatricians' workflow interruptions, performance, and care quality: a unit-based controlled intervention.

Authors:  Matthias Weigl; Florian Hoffmann; Andreas Müller; Nina Barth; Peter Angerer
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.183

9.  The roles of MDs and RNs as initiators and recipients of interruptions in workflow.

Authors:  Juliana J Brixey; David J Robinson; James P Turley; Jiajie Zhang
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 4.046

10.  Using the computer in the clinical consultation; setting the stage, reviewing, recording, and taking actions: multi-channel video study.

Authors:  Pushpa Kumarapeli; Simon de Lusignan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.